🚨 INTERLINK BITFLIP: IS IT LEGAL UNDER U.S. LAW? CFTC | CALIFORNIA | NEVADA | AMBASSADOR CONSENT InterLink claims to be registered in California and Nevada. Now InterLink has introduced BitFlip, an application where users predict whether Bitcoin’s price will move UP or DOWN. But registering a company in the United States and operating a potentially regulated financial product are two very different things. INTERLINK CORE TEAM, WE HAVE SOME SERIOUS LEGAL QUESTIONS. ⚖️ 1. FEDERAL LAW — CFTC Under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), certain binary options and financial prediction contracts are subject to CFTC regulation. If BitFlip allows users to risk $ITL tokens on Bitcoin price movements, its legal classification needs clarification. ❓ Is BitFlip a regulated binary options product? ❓ Has InterLink obtained the necessary regulatory authorization, if applicable? ❓ Are U.S. residents permitted to participate? ❓ Which registered entity or exemption, if any, permits these transactions? ⚖️ 2. CALIFORNIA LAW — DIGITAL FINANCIAL ASSETS California Financial Code § 3101 et seq. establishes regulatory requirements for certain digital financial asset businesses. California’s Digital Financial Assets Law licensing requirements took effect July 1, 2026, subject to applicable exemptions and transitional provisions. ❓ Does InterLink hold a California DFPI license, have a qualifying application pending, or rely on an exemption? ❓ Does BitFlip involve regulated digital asset activities? ❓ Which legal entity is responsible for user funds and transactions? A CALIFORNIA BUSINESS REGISTRATION IS NOT THE SAME AS A FINANCIAL SERVICES LICENSE. ⚖️ 3. NEVADA LAW — GAMING AND WAGERING Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 463 regulates certain gaming activities. NRS 463.01962 defines a wager in terms of risking money or something representing value on an uncertain outcome. NRS 463.0152 addresses the definition of a game or gambling game. ❓ Has BitFlip been evaluated under Nevada gaming laws? ❓ Do $ITL tokens represent something of value under applicable Nevada law? ❓ If BitFlip requires gaming authorization, does InterLink possess it? ❓ Has InterLink obtained a legal opinion addressing these questions? CALLING SOMETHING A GAME DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY EXEMPT IT FROM FINANCIAL OR GAMING REGULATIONS. 🚨 4. THE INTERLINK AMBASSADOR QUESTION NOW LET’S TALK ABOUT SOMETHING EVEN MORE IMPORTANT. InterLink has ambassadors representing its ecosystem worldwide. But have those ambassadors given explicit consent to have their names, titles, and affiliations associated with BitFlip and other potentially regulated applications? INTERLINK, ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS: ❓ Have ambassadors signed agreements authorizing the use of their names or affiliations in connection with BitFlip? ❓ Were ambassadors informed about the potential regulatory risks of promoting financial prediction products? ❓ Are ambassadors being asked to promote these applications without receiving adequate legal and compliance information? ❓ Who assumes responsibility if an ambassador promotes a product in a jurisdiction where authorization is required? ❓ Can ambassadors refuse to promote BitFlip without consequences? BEING AN AMBASSADOR DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN CONSENTING TO PROMOTE EVERY FINANCIAL PRODUCT A COMPANY INTRODUCES. And an ambassador’s name, reputation, or affiliation should not be used to imply an endorsement they have not authorized. ⚖️ 5. CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA REGISTRATION DOES NOT MEAN AUTOMATIC LEGAL AUTHORIZATION Let’s make something absolutely clear. A company registered in California or Nevada does not automatically receive permission to operate: • A regulated derivatives platform. • A licensed gambling operation. • A covered digital asset exchange. • A regulated financial prediction market. Each activity must be evaluated under the laws applicable to that business and its customers. CORPORATE REGISTRATION IS NOT PROOF THAT EVERY PRODUCT IS REGULATORILY COMPLIANT. 🚨 6. WE ARE NOT SAYING INTERLINK OR BITFLIP IS ILLEGAL. READ THAT AGAIN. WE ARE NOT ACCUSING INTERLINK OF BREAKING ANY LAW. WE ARE NOT CLAIMING BITFLIP IS AN ILLEGAL GAMBLING PLATFORM. WE ARE NOT CLAIMING AMBASSADORS HAVE BEEN USED WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT. We are asking for evidence. Evidence of the legal framework governing BitFlip. Evidence of applicable licenses, registrations, or exemptions. Evidence of transparent transactions and settlements. Evidence that ambassadors have authorized the use of their names and affiliations where such authorization is required. IF EVERYTHING IS LEGALLY COMPLIANT, INTERLINK SHOULD BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN HOW. 🚨 7. OUR FINAL QUESTIONS TO INTERLINK You claim to be registered in California and Nevada. You claim to have millions of users. You have introduced an application involving predictions about Bitcoin’s price. SO WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE? Where is the regulatory clarification? Where is the legal entity responsible for BitFlip? Where is the explanation of how CFTC regulations apply—or why they do not? Where is the explanation of California and Nevada compliance? Where is the documentation establishing ambassador consent? WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR PROMISES. WE ARE ASKING FOR DOCUMENTATION. Because when millions of people are involved, regulatory compliance and transparency matter. 🔥 INTERLINK CORE TEAM: SHOW THE EVIDENCE. TRANSPARENCY IS NOT AN ATTACK. ASKING QUESTIONS IS NOT AN ACCUSATION. AND A COMPANY REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IS NOT A LICENSE TO OPERATE EVERY TYPE OF FINANCIAL PRODUCT. 📚 OFFICIAL LEGAL REFERENCES 🇺🇸 Commodity Exchange Act — 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. 🇺🇸 California Digital Financial Assets Law — Financial Code § 3101 et seq. 🇺🇸 Nevada Revised Statutes — NRS 463.0152 and NRS 463.01962. Official regulatory resources: CFTC — Binary Options Advisory⁠ California DFPI — Digital Financial Assets Law⁠ Nevada Revised Statutes — Chapter 463⁠ @kv_interlink @kv_interlinkITL @inter_link @Crypto_A_A @CFTC @miratang16 @itlx_defi @itl_fdn #InterLink #BitFlip #ITLG #ITL #CFTC #California #Nevada #Cftc #CryptoRegulation ⸻ Important: The cited statutes establish legal frameworks, not proof that InterLink has violated them. Their applicability depends on BitFlip’s actual mechanics, token value, geographic availability, and corporate activities. InterLink’s registration, licensing, and ambassador-consent status have not been independently verified.

🚨 INTERLINK LABS: THE SOFIN NETWORK STORY — FOLLOW THE CORPORATE RECORDS! Before Interlink Labs, there was SOFIN Network, Inc. And now we’ve found something interesting in Vietnam. 🇻🇳 I’m not talking about rumors, anonymous sources, or speculation. I’m talking about publicly available corporate records, company names, dates, officers, and websites. Let’s examine the history. 📌 PART 1 — THE ORIGINAL COMPANY According to the Nevada Secretary of State: Original company name: SOFIN Network, Inc. Current company name: INTERLINK LABS, INC. Original incorporation: July 27, 2023 Name changed: November 13, 2024 Entity Number: E33749712023-1 Nevada Business ID: NV20232854943 Name-change filing: 20244467000 Entity type: Domestic Corporation Current status: Active Jurisdiction: Nevada, USA Annual renewal date: July 31, 2027 That’s right. INTERLINK LABS WAS PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED AS SOFIN NETWORK, INC. The name change happened approximately 16 months after the original incorporation. 📌 PART 2 — WHO WAS RUNNING THE COMPANY? Now look at the officer information in the Nevada records. PRESIDENT: VIET NGUYEN The Nevada record lists: Name: Viet Nguyen Position: President Last updated: July 27, 2023 Status: Active TREASURER: VINH NGUYEN Name: Vinh Nguyen Position: Treasurer Last updated: July 30, 2026 Both officer entries display the same Carson City, Nevada business address. These aren’t names taken from social media. They’re listed in the Nevada corporate records. 📌 PART 3 — NOW LET’S GO TO VIETNAM 🇻🇳 While researching SOFIN, I found a Vietnamese technology company operating under the name SOFIN GROUP. Its website is: 🌐 SOFIN GROUP⁠ According to its website, SOFIN Group operates in: 🔹 Artificial Intelligence 🔹 Enterprise Software 🔹 Digital Transformation 🔹 AI Automation 🔹 Digital Media 🔹 Technology Education 🔹 Technology Investments The website describes ambitions to become a leading technology group in Southeast Asia. 📌 PART 4 — THE NAME THAT CAUGHT MY ATTENTION Remember the president listed in the Nevada records? VIET NGUYEN Now look at the publicly displayed contact email on SOFIN Group’s Vietnamese website: 📧 [email protected] The website lists its headquarters in: 216–218 Trần Hưng Đạo, An Hải, Da Nang, Vietnam. The name Viet Nguyen appears in the Nevada corporate record, and the same name appears in SOFIN Group’s contact email. That’s an interesting detail worth examining. 📌 PART 5 — THERE IS ALSO A REGISTERED SOFIN NETWORK IN VIETNAM Vietnamese business listings identify another important record. Company: SOFIN NETWORK VIETNAM COMPANY LIMITED Vietnamese name: CÔNG TY TNHH SOFIN NETWORK VIỆT NAM Business registration/tax number: 0402218246 Registration date: December 19, 2023 Registered location: Da Nang, Vietnam Listed legal representative: Nguyễn Quang Việt Some updated listings identify the business as SOFIN HOLDING while retaining SOFIN NETWORK VIETNAM as an alternative name. The Vietnamese business records also identify software development, technology services, media production, and related activities. 📌 PART 6 — THE TIMELINE Let’s put the dates together. 🇺🇸 JULY 27, 2023 SOFIN Network, Inc. incorporated in Nevada. Viet Nguyen appears in the officer records as president. 🇻🇳 DECEMBER 19, 2023 SOFIN Network Vietnam Company Limited registered in Vietnam. 🇺🇸 NOVEMBER 13, 2024 SOFIN Network, Inc. changed its corporate name to INTERLINK LABS, INC. 🇺🇸 JULY 30, 2026 Nevada officer records show an update to the treasurer entry for Vinh Nguyen. 🇻🇳 OCTOBER 2026 SOFIN Group’s website publicly displays the contact email: [email protected] 📌 PART 7 — MY QUESTIONS FOR INTERLINK LABS Now I have some questions. 1. Why was SOFIN Network, Inc. renamed Interlink Labs in November 2024? 2. What products or services was SOFIN Network developing before the name change? 3. What was Viet Nguyen’s role in establishing the original Nevada corporation? 4. Does the Viet Nguyen named in Nevada’s corporate records also have a role at SOFIN Group in Vietnam? 5. What is the corporate relationship, if any, between SOFIN Network Vietnam, SOFIN Group, and Interlink Labs? 6. Was the original SOFIN business involved in developing any technology later used by Interlink? 7. Who were the original shareholders, and did ownership change when the company was renamed? 🚨 FINAL QUESTION Millions of people are being introduced to Interlink Network. Wouldn’t it be reasonable for the community to understand the corporate history behind the project? SOFIN NETWORK, INC. → INTERLINK LABS, INC. The name change is documented. The Nevada officers are named. The Vietnamese SOFIN businesses have publicly available records. And the name Viet Nguyen appears in both the Nevada officer information and the Vietnamese website’s contact details. The next question is how these pieces fit together. I’m sharing the records so everyone can examine them independently. 📄 Nevada Entity: E33749712023-1 🌐 Nevada Secretary of State⁠ 🌐 SOFIN Group Vietnam⁠ 🇻🇳 Vietnam Business Registration: 0402218246 Transparency begins with asking questions. #Interlink #ITLG #SOFINNetwork #InterlinkLabs #Crypto #Blockchain @Crypto_A_A