Sarah Connor (@libesabi) header
Sarah Connor (@libesabi) profile picture

Ph.D International and EU Law, Migration and Biotech Law, Lawyer Η ζωή είναι γλυκιά, γλυκιά είναι η ζωή Διονύσιος Σολωμός

Earth I
Joined March 2012
Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)Photo by Sarah Connor (@libesabi)
Sarah Connor retweeted
The EU will talk about democratic rights constantly and then take them away the moment you vote against them
Nie pozwolę, by prawica wyprowadziła nas z Unii Europejskiej. O to dziś toczy się gra.
25
292
6
1,503
15,019
Sarah Connor retweeted
🚨 POLAND: For those tho do NOT understand. A COUP is being held RIGHT NOW: A coup (short for coup d'état) which means a sudden, illegal, and often violent seizure of government power by a small group of insiders, such as military leaders or political elites. Globalist are very likely involved.
50
448
19
1,238
80,927
Sarah Connor retweeted
🚨POLAND: A COUP IS UNDERWAY🚨 Vice-President of the Constitutional Tribunal, Judge Bartłomiej Sochański, with a strong statement to the World (in English). Share this!!! UDOSTĘPNIJ @Telegraph @CNN @AP @nytimes @Jerusalem_Post @DailyMail @el_pais @elonmusk @timesofindia @News24Aust
78
1,993
124
4,522
186,756
Sarah Connor retweeted
@donaldtusk is a dictator !!!!! We will stop him!!!!!!! Poles will never give up!!!!! Freedom!!!!! 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱💪 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱Non possumus!!!!!!!!
3
9
46
486
Sarah Connor retweeted
Democracy is under attack in Poland tonight as PM Donald Tusk has launched a coup against President Karol Nawrocki over the constitutional tribunal. Tusk has committed treason on behalf of the EU. He must be removed from power. Free Poland!
182
1,556
33
4,390
36,844
Sarah Connor retweeted
You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland). You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission.
396
6,016
440
26,230
525,086
Sarah Connor retweeted
Here you go... You have to remember that two days ago the Labour government gave Zelensky 10bn
1
1
1
33
"Coloro che credettero in Maometto fin dall'inizio non furono uomini saggi, esperti nelle cose divine e umane, ma uomini bestiali che dimoravano nei deserti, del tutto ignoranti di ogni insegnamento divino; e fu grazie a una moltitudine di tali uomini e con la forza delle armi che egli costrinse gli altri a sottomettersi alla sua legge." ~ Summa Contra Gentiles, Libro 1, Capitolo 6 San Tommaso D'Aquino
54
Sarah Connor retweeted
A MUST WATCH. 🙏🇬🇧 This priest says what millions of us have been thinking. "What we've got now is a Church of England that is basically going apostate and denying the faith." "You have now a King that seems to be kowtowing again to Islam over Christianity." "He's supposed to be the defender of the Protestant Christian faith." And he's right. This year's royal finance report quietly dropped "Defender of the Faith" and swapped it for protecting "the space for Faith within the multi-faith nation." Slipped into a report about money, with no announcement. "He is unravelling the very heart of what makes Britain, Britain." Watch every second of this. 👇
186
1,727
79
3,775
40,510
The Seven Deadly Sins – at the Scale of a Civilization. More than fourteen centuries ago, Christian monks drew up a list of seven sins. Not laws – a map of the human heart. Envy. Pride. Wrath. Sloth. Greed. Gluttony. Lust. It is still pretty much the most accurate psychology anyone has written. The monks were looking at one soul at a time. Look at whole systems instead, and you find the same seven. A vice that stays private ruins one life. Scaled up, it becomes an institution: a tax, a ministry, an ideology, a budget line. People will always have vices. The question is who pays for them. Adam Smith noticed that we owe our dinner not to the butcher’s kindness but to his self-interest. A free market does not abolish greed – it puts it to work: you get rich only by serving others, and you go bankrupt if you don’t. The vice pays its own bill. Bad systems let the vice send its bill to someone else – the taxpayer, the next generation, the innocent. A good civilization does not abolish sin. It sends the bill to the sinner. So here is what comes next, one sin at a time: 1. Envy – the engine of socialism. If I can’t have it, nobody should. 2. Pride – the planner’s conceit, from Plato’s philosopher-king to the Brussels directive. 3. Wrath – vengeance without trial, from the guillotine to cancel culture. 4. Sloth – comfort as a political program, from bread and circuses to the empty cradle. 5. Greed – the one everybody expects us to defend. We won’t: crony capitalism, the bailout, private profit and public loss. 6. Gluttony – debt. Eating the future. 7. Lust – pleasure cut off from its consequences, and from children. And then the cures: the four old virtues – prudence, justice, temperance, fortitude – and the institutions that make them stick. The monks thought sin was a matter for the confessional. They were half right. It is also a matter for the budget. Show me a country’s budget, and I will tell you which sins it subsidizes. First up: Envy. Envy – the Engine of Socialism. A genie appears to a peasant: "I’ll grant you one wish." The peasant thinks for a long time. His neighbor has a goat. "Kill the neighbor’s goat." That is envy. Not wanting what someone else has – that’s ambition, and it built most of the world. Envy is wanting him not to have it. Even if you gain nothing. Even if you lose. Every other sin at least promises pleasure. Envy promises only that someone else will have less. And it is the one sin nobody ever confesses – because it never calls itself envy. It calls itself fairness. Justice. Equality. Socialism is envy at scale: not lifting the bottom, but cutting the top. Thatcher caught it in one sentence in Parliament: her opponents would rather the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich. In experiments, people will pay out of their own pocket to destroy money belonging to others. Whole countries do the same: the tax that raises little but drives away the people it targets, the school that abolishes the advanced class because not everyone can take it, the rule written to bring down whoever got ahead. In Soviet villages, a kulak – a "rich" peasant – was often a man with two cows. Liquidating the kulaks did not give anyone a cow. It gave everyone the famine. That is envy’s bill. Envy aims it at the successful. But the successful leave, or stop trying – and the bill comes back to everyone. Kill the goat and you get no milk. Neither does anyone else. The Greeks knew there were two kinds of rivalry. Hesiod wrote that the potter competes with the potter, the craftsman with the craftsman – and that this strife is good, because it makes everyone work harder. The other kind only destroys. A free society does not abolish envy. It converts it: you may have what your neighbor has – by doing what he did. Socialism converts it the other way, into policy, so that nobody has the goat. The cure is old and simple: gratitude for what you have, and the ambition to build what you don’t. Next: Pride.
Reality Always Collects – Who Pays for Being Wrong? We have written about books and films, popes and presidents, Rome and Warsaw, art, money, children. It looks like many subjects. It is one. Every mistake and lie gets paid for. Sooner or later, in full. Reality always collects. The only questions are when – and who pays. A good society makes the person who is wrong pay. Quickly, a little, himself. The business with a bad idea goes bankrupt. The politician who governs badly loses the election. The rocket explodes on the test pad, not with people on board. Small failures, early, paid by the people responsible. That is how a society learns. A bad system does the opposite. It protects the person who is wrong. It postpones the bill and passes it on – and the bill grows, and arrives later, much larger, at the door of someone who did nothing. The children. The poor. The next generation. Sometimes an entire country. A lie is a loan taken out against reality. You borrow comfort today; someone else repays it tomorrow, with interest. Once you see this, history becomes simple. The intellectual in his café designs the perfect society; the peasant pays with his life. Cambodia paid for ideas born in Paris. Rousseau wrote a celebrated book on raising children; his own five children paid for it in an orphanage. Rome cheated on its money until prices told the truth and the empire could no longer pay its soldiers. Look at our own time with the same question. The official who cannot be fired. The program that never has to show results. The art that cannot be judged. The promotion for loyalty instead of competence. The law designed so it can never be undone. The expert who was wrong and is still on television. Being wrong costs them nothing. Someone else pays. They always prefer abstractions to the particular. A real person sends a bill. This is why every utopia loves "humanity" – and sacrifices people. What our civilization built – slowly, over centuries – is the opposite: ways of making the bill reach the right address. The market, where a price tells the truth. Science, where the experiment decides. Courts and free elections, where even the powerful can be removed. Free speech, where anyone can point at the mistake. The family, where parents live with the results. Common sense – the lessons our ancestors paid for, so we would not have to pay again. And building: a bridge stands or it doesn’t, a rocket flies or it doesn’t. You cannot lie your way through that. Demography – the final invoice. A civilization that doesn’t reproduce pays with its existence. The truth vs the lie – in the end, it all comes down to that. And the lie never stands alone: it needs fear to protect it. Fear is what stops people from sending the bill. Communism and its heirs also do it to us by muddying reality and sowing confusion – when nothing is clear, nobody can tell what the bill is, or whose. The good news: for the first time, we have a real chance to switch – from a society built on fear and lies to one built on truth. For most of history, lying was cheap and checking was expensive. That is changing. Anyone can now check and say out loud what doesn’t add up – and soon machines will check faster than any liar can talk. The bill is starting to find its address. That is why some people are suddenly so nervous. In Poland we lived inside a system built entirely on unpaid bills. Everyone knew. Nobody could say it. In 1989 the bill came due all at once, and a system that looked eternal disappeared almost overnight. We have seen how this ends. So, the same three things as always. Tell the truth – keep the books honest, starting with your own. Have courage – send the bill to the right address, even when the address is powerful. And build – put your work in front of reality and let it judge you. Reality is patient. But it always collects. The only choice is whether we pay early, in small amounts, ourselves – or late, catastrophically, through our children.
63
388
43
1,176
121,493
The Seven Cures We have gone through the seven sins and watched each one grow from a private weakness into a public system. But the cures are as old as the sins, and our ancestors knew them all. A civilization is made of what it rewards and punishes. Reward the sins, and they become systems. Reward the cures, and they become a civilization. Against envy, admiration. Both begin the same way: by looking up at someone who has done better. Envy says: tear him down. Admiration says: show me how. One turns the feeling into destruction, the other into work. And few people envy when everyone around is doing great things. Against pride, humility. Humility is not thinking you are small. It is knowing the world is bigger than your plan. The proud man designs a society for everyone; the humble man lets everyone design his own life. And Madison put it most simply, noting that if men were angels, no government would be necessary – so power must be divided, and ambition made to check ambition. The cure for pride is not a humble ruler. It is a system that does not need one. Against wrath, patience. Wrath wants the punishment now, before the facts. Patience waits for them. Scaled up, patience has a name: the rule of law – evidence first, verdict last, or not at all. Every mob, from the guillotine to the hashtag, is wrath that refused to wait. Against sloth, diligence – not overwork, but care: doing your own work, and finishing it. The surest cure is ownership. Give a man something of his own – a house, a field, a business – and he will take care of it. Take everything from him, and he will care about nothing. When someone tells you that you will own nothing and be happy, he is selling you sloth. Against greed, generosity. Greed wants to take; generosity wants to give – and you can only give what is yours. Generosity with other people's money is not a virtue. It is greed wearing a halo. The state does not give. It moves money, and keeps a share for the moving. Many of the West's proudest hospitals, universities and cathedrals began as real gifts. Against gluttony, temperance. Gluttony lives at the expense of later and others. Temperance leaves something on the table – for tomorrow, for the children. At the scale of a state, gluttony is called debt, and temperance a balanced budget. An old proverb says that a society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they will never sit. Temperance is love for those who come after us. Against lust, faithfulness. Lust takes and leaves. Faithfulness stays – and builds a home. Lust is sterile. A home is where children grow up. A civilization that cures lust gets the one thing lust never gives: grandchildren. Put the seven together, and the pattern is plain. Every sin consumes; every cure builds. You could argue it is all just a matter of time preference – how much you value today over tomorrow. Every sin wants it now. Every cure can wait – for later, and for those who come after us. Aristocracy is a matter of time preference. Not blood, not money: the habit of thinking in generations. A politician thinks until the next election; an aristocrat, until his grandchildren. That is why a state that lives from election to election eats the future. And you need no title for it – any family that thinks in generations is founding a dynasty. And notice how each sin became respectable: it changed its name. Envy calls itself social justice. Pride calls itself expertise. Wrath calls itself the people's anger. Sloth calls itself a right. Greed calls itself generosity – with your money. Gluttony calls itself body positivity. Lust calls itself liberation. No sin becomes a system under its own name. It needs the Lie. So one cure comes before the other seven: call things by their names. The cures need only the truth – and someone brave enough to say it first.
The Seven Deadly Sins – at the Scale of a Civilization. More than fourteen centuries ago, Christian monks drew up a list of seven sins. Not laws – a map of the human heart. Envy. Pride. Wrath. Sloth. Greed. Gluttony. Lust. It is still pretty much the most accurate psychology anyone has written. The monks were looking at one soul at a time. Look at whole systems instead, and you find the same seven. A vice that stays private ruins one life. Scaled up, it becomes an institution: a tax, a ministry, an ideology, a budget line. People will always have vices. The question is who pays for them. Adam Smith noticed that we owe our dinner not to the butcher’s kindness but to his self-interest. A free market does not abolish greed – it puts it to work: you get rich only by serving others, and you go bankrupt if you don’t. The vice pays its own bill. Bad systems let the vice send its bill to someone else – the taxpayer, the next generation, the innocent. A good civilization does not abolish sin. It sends the bill to the sinner. So here is what comes next, one sin at a time: 1. Envy – the engine of socialism. If I can’t have it, nobody should. 2. Pride – the planner’s conceit, from Plato’s philosopher-king to the Brussels directive. 3. Wrath – vengeance without trial, from the guillotine to cancel culture. 4. Sloth – comfort as a political program, from bread and circuses to the empty cradle. 5. Greed – the one everybody expects us to defend. We won’t: crony capitalism, the bailout, private profit and public loss. 6. Gluttony – debt. Eating the future. 7. Lust – pleasure cut off from its consequences, and from children. And then the cures: the four old virtues – prudence, justice, temperance, fortitude – and the institutions that make them stick. The monks thought sin was a matter for the confessional. They were half right. It is also a matter for the budget. Show me a country’s budget, and I will tell you which sins it subsidizes. First up: Envy. Envy – the Engine of Socialism. A genie appears to a peasant: "I’ll grant you one wish." The peasant thinks for a long time. His neighbor has a goat. "Kill the neighbor’s goat." That is envy. Not wanting what someone else has – that’s ambition, and it built most of the world. Envy is wanting him not to have it. Even if you gain nothing. Even if you lose. Every other sin at least promises pleasure. Envy promises only that someone else will have less. And it is the one sin nobody ever confesses – because it never calls itself envy. It calls itself fairness. Justice. Equality. Socialism is envy at scale: not lifting the bottom, but cutting the top. Thatcher caught it in one sentence in Parliament: her opponents would rather the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich. In experiments, people will pay out of their own pocket to destroy money belonging to others. Whole countries do the same: the tax that raises little but drives away the people it targets, the school that abolishes the advanced class because not everyone can take it, the rule written to bring down whoever got ahead. In Soviet villages, a kulak – a "rich" peasant – was often a man with two cows. Liquidating the kulaks did not give anyone a cow. It gave everyone the famine. That is envy’s bill. Envy aims it at the successful. But the successful leave, or stop trying – and the bill comes back to everyone. Kill the goat and you get no milk. Neither does anyone else. The Greeks knew there were two kinds of rivalry. Hesiod wrote that the potter competes with the potter, the craftsman with the craftsman – and that this strife is good, because it makes everyone work harder. The other kind only destroys. A free society does not abolish envy. It converts it: you may have what your neighbor has – by doing what he did. Socialism converts it the other way, into policy, so that nobody has the goat. The cure is old and simple: gratitude for what you have, and the ambition to build what you don’t. Next: Pride.
37
314
28
888
18,122
Domani, sabato 31 ottobre, alle 10:30, saremo in piazza Bra a Verona! Scenderemo in piazza per dire no a qualsiasi legge sul suicidio assistito e chiedere al Governo di impugnare la legge del Veneto sul fin vita. Come ha detto il nostro presidente Antonio Brandi: «Non si abbandonano i malati offrendogli veleno». Vogliamo ribellarci a questa logica.
15
39
493
This is what the “innocent children” of Gaza are taught at school. They cosplay as armed hostage takers surrounding groups of kids in class with rifles. This is the society the world wants to reward with a state. This is what self determination looks like for Palestinians. They never choose the path of peace. They’ve chosen the path of war and death and murder. This is what the western world supports.
89
452
99
769
27,268
Sarah Connor retweeted
#diariodelgiorno professoressa o presunta tale ti dicono nulla queste facce di cattivi maestri???
1
1
110
Sarah Connor retweeted
Replying to @BolsonaroSP
🆘🇧🇷🇺🇸
3
9
91
4,278
🇧🇷 Brazil may be heading toward even greater sacrifices and darker days. But years from now, when I look my children in the eyes, I will be able to tell them one thing with absolute certainty: “Your father never surrendered. He stood on the right side of history. He fought the good fight.” As I always say: my commitment has never been to victory at any cost. My commitment is to doing what is right, whatever the cost. Because the greatest punishment I could ever face would not be defeat, persecution, exile or even jail. It would be having to stand shoulder to shoulder with those who embrace Hezbollah, Hamas, and other bloodthirsty terrorists. I would rather lose everything standing for what I believe is right - by The Holy Bible - than win anything standing beside evil. History will judge us all. And I know where I stood.
🤖 Made with AI
1,315
4,189
92
19,039
212,269
Sarah Connor retweeted
🚨 THE TITANIC WASN'T A TRAGEDY. IT WAS A MASS EXECUTION TO BIRTH THE FEDERAL RESERVE SLAVE SYSTEM 🚨 In 1912 the Rothschild banking cartel and their puppet J.P. Morgan needed to eliminate the final roadblocks to total control over America's money. Three of the richest and most influential men on Earth stood in their way. These men saw the scam clearly and fiercely opposed the creation of a private central bank that would enslave generations: John Jacob Astor IV: wealthiest man aboard, strong Tesla supporter, outspoken critic of centralized banking tyranny. Benjamin Guggenheim: mining billionaire with massive influence. Isidor Straus: Macy's empire founder, another titan who refused to kneel. These three billionaires rejected the Federal Reserve Act: a sinister private cartel owned by elites, designed to print infinite fiat debt, finance endless wars, and profit from human misery and death. So the cabal set the trap. The "unsinkable" Titanic's maiden voyage became the perfect hit. J.P. Morgan, who owned the White Star Line and financed the ship's construction, suddenly canceled his personal trip at the last moment. His friend Milton Hershey also backed out and went on to build his chocolate empire instead. Coincidence? The ship was pushed at full speed into a known iceberg field with only half the required lifeboats. Even worse: Titanic featured experimental electromagnetic deck-sealing technology. Watertight doors that could lock passengers below decks like prisoners while the elite escaped. Outcome? Astor, Guggenheim, and Straus perish in the icy Atlantic. Opposition erased. Less than two years later (1913-1914) the Federal Reserve Act is forced through under suspicious Christmas Eve conditions. A private banking cartel now controls the U.S. money supply, charges interest on debt conjured from nothing, and funds world wars, depressions, and endless inflation theft. The Rothschilds and Morgan didn't just get away with murder. They built the greatest financial enslavement machine in history. Wake up. The "accident" was a deliberate strike. The iceberg was the murder weapon. The Fed was the reward. Japan’s @yutokanzakireal already warned about the upcoming engineered crisis to give birth to a new system. Who else has to vanish before the next major power grab? 👀
ああ、もし現在の経済秩序の崩壊を、世界的な大危機と重なるまで遅らせることができたら、どれほど都合がいいことだろう。 AI、量子コンピューティング、エネルギー危機。どれでも好きなものを選べばいい。 我々の「同盟国」は、すでに完璧なスケープゴート探しに奔走している。:)
75
1,245
75
2,806
83,373
Qui s’étonne de ce qu’il se passe avec Die Linke à Berlin, en Allemagne, personne qui a lu l’histoire. Il reproduise le même schéma qu’en Iran avec Khomeini à une échelle locale ? En 1978-1979, la gauche iranienne n’a pas été « instrumentalisée malgré elle ». Elle a choisi de porter Khomeini. Le parti Tudeh (communiste pro-soviétique) a fini par le soutenir ouvertement comme chef de file anti-impérialiste. Les Fedayeen et d’autres groupes marxistes ont combattu le Shah dans les rues aux côtés des islamistes, ont amplifié ses messages depuis l’exil, et ont vu dans les mollahs un allié tactique contre « l’ennemi principal » : le Shah modernisateur, la monarchie et l’influence occidentale. Pour une large partie des étudiants, des intellectuels séculaires et des militants, les avancées du Shah droits des femmes, éducation de masse, industrialisation n’étaient pas du progrès, c’était de l’« occidentalisation » à détruire. L’ennemi de mon ennemi est mon ami. On croyait que les islamistes seraient un intermède, un instrument contre le vrai adversaire, et qu’on récupérerait le pouvoir ensuite. Ce calcul a été renforcé par la bien-pensance occidentale. Michel Foucault s’est rendu en Iran, a rencontré Khomeini à Neauphle-le-Château et a publié des articles enthousiastes célébrant une « spiritualité politique » face au matérialisme occidental. Il décrivait Khomeini comme un « vieux saint en exil » et la révolution comme quelque chose de singulier et authentique, pas comme un projet de gouvernement des clercs. Sartre, Beauvoir, Genet, des journalistes de Libération ou Le Monde, et des voix américaines (Andrew Young comparant Khomeini à un social-démocrate et la révolution aux droits civiques) ont offert une couverture favorable. Le récit dominant était celui d’un peuple opprimé contre un tyran pro-américain. Les avertissements sur le projet théocratique (velayat-e faqih), sur les femmes, les minorités ou les laïcs ont été traités comme secondaires. Khomeini a bénéficié d’une plateforme médiatique et d’une aura de légitimité que le Shah n’avait plus. La pression humanitaire et médiatique sous Carter a aussi contribué à paralyser la capacité du régime à réprimer. Le résultat est connu et sanglant. Une fois le Shah parti et le pouvoir pris, Khomeini a écrasé ces mêmes alliés. Purges des organisations de gauche, exécutions, dissolution du Tudeh, liquidation des Fedayeen et d’autres groupes. Les idiots utiles iraniens et occidentaux ont découvert que l’islamisme politique ne partage pas : il purifie. La bien-pensance occidentale a, pour l’essentiel, regardé ailleurs ou minimisé. L’anti-occidentalisme avait primé sur la lucidité. C’est exactement le schéma que Die Linke reproduit aujourd’hui à Berlin. On clientélise les milieux les plus radicaux du « pro-Palestine » figures proches du Hamas et du FPLP, réseaux de Neukölln, présence à ses fêtes de victoire pour gagner des voix. On ferme les yeux sur les célébrations du 7 octobre, les appels à la violence et l’antisémitisme au nom de l’antiracisme et de l’ennemi principal. Les programmes disent « non à l’islamisme ». Les faits disent « on prend les voix ». Et déjà, la candidate Elif Eralp se fait coincer par ses propres notes : elle et son mari ont peur de « ces gens-là », refusent de les nommer, craignent pour leur famille. C’est le stade où les alliés commencent à mesurer que le partenaire n’est pas un instrument temporaire. En Iran, le prix a été une dictature théocratique et des décennies de répression. En Allemagne, on en est au clientélisme électoral réussi et aux premières fissures visibles. Le mécanisme est le même : alliance de circonstance, déni bien-pensant, légitimation du partenaire, puis découverte tardive que les islamistes politiques imposent leurs règles. L’histoire a déjà prévenu, elle n’a pas changé de méthode. Ceux qui prétendent que « cette fois c’est différent » refusent simplement de lire ce qui est déjà écrit.
39
418
20
882
10,823
Allora io sono una cogliona che ho fatto il dottorato a tor vergata senza borsa per 3 anni e mezzo vinto senza spinte di nessuno, nel sistema piu classista in assoluto di Giurisprudenza ed ho lavorato pure a Roma, ovvero due lavori e lo studio e ricerca. Dite alla ragazza che fino a qualche anno fa per piu di 50 anni i dottorati, per la maggioranza erano senza borsa. E io vengo da una famiglia di umili origini contadine. #Cacciari a me della pizza non frega nulla mi piace quella fatta in casa dalla mi mamma. Finiscila di parlare in nome e per conto di persone la cui vita non conosci. Quanta esperienza di povertà hai fatto davvero nella tua vità? Lo sai che persone come te non sono credibili? Ma davvero pensate che possiate rappreserntare il popolo e le persone più frahili e povere del paese con la vostra vita di privilegi e arroganza? Siamo stufi di vedervi, pure. Non rappresenntate nessuno e certamente noi del popolo vero e proletariato. #diariodelgiorno
2
69
#diariodelgiorno #4disera SAPETE QUANTI STUDENTI e GIOVANI SONO SCESI IN PIAZZA? Milano: 3,7%. Roma: 0,8%. Bologna: 1,9%. Torino: 1,9%. Eppure, a sentire certi racconti della sinistra e dell'opposizione, sembrava fosse scesa in piazza un’intera generazione. E non dimentichiamolo: ACCANTO AI MANIFESTANTI C’ERANO ANCHE I CENTRI SOCIALI. Io sto con chi è rimasto a casa, con la stragrande maggioranza degli studenti che studia, si impegna e non si riconosce necessariamente in queste manifestazioni. TANTO RUMORE TANTA VIOLENZA NON SIGNIFICA RAPPRESENTARE UN’INTERA GENERAZIONE. Una minoranza in piazza non può parlare a nome di tutti i giovani!
95
105
7
524
14,756