Linux Roller

Fui piloto de Citation, un jet privado pequeño que aún tengo (aunque hace 15 años que no vuelo más como piloto). Curiosamente, desde el piso 42 de nuestro apartamento en Miami que está en Edgewater cerca del aeropuerto, vimos una tormenta enorme: rayos incesantes durante horas, lluvias intensas y vientos fuertes. En medio de eso me enteré de la noticia del Learjet 60 (N722BD) que se estrelló al norte de Miami y vi los videos del impacto impresionante, casi vertical. Esta es mi teoría de lo que pasó (la investigación oficial lo confirmará o no, pero la comparto): según los datos de vuelo y radar y la transmisión de radio que es un horror de escuchar, el avión entró directo al núcleo de una celda severa a FL350, con tops cerca de 47.000 pies. Subió un por el updraft fuerte y luego se descontroló por completo: overspeed, bank de 60° y descensos de más de 20.000–32.000 fpm hasta estrellarse (descender a más de la velocidad indicada destruye un avión por eso hay un arco verde y rojo). Este accidente es muy raro pero bien un patrón parecido al del Air France 447 en 2009 en el que desaparecieron más de 200 pasajeros y tripulación en el Atlantico y a otros accidentes donde se penetra o se acerca demasiado a núcleos de tormentas intensas . Los radares mostraban claramente esas celdas; en jets ligeros la regla es desviarse con buen margen, no atravesarlas, esto puede ser error de la mujer que pilotaba. Lo que hacen las tormentas al cambiar la temperatura exterior, es que los aviones no se sustentan más yendo a la misma velocidad. Se lo llama el coffin corner. O que se hagan muy difíciles de mantener controlados. Cerca del trópico las tormentas suelen ser mucho más altas (tops que fácilmente superan los 45.000–50.000 pies) por la gran cantidad de humedad y energía disponible. Es decir que las tormentas son más altas que el techo de los aviones, que no hay manera de evitarlas por encima. Por eso, en general, es más tranquilo volar rutas como Madrid–Nueva York (donde se puede rodear o pasar por encima de la convección con más margen) que Madrid–Buenos Aires, donde el ecuador y la zona de convergencia intertropical generan celdas más potentes y altas que obligan a desvíos más frecuentes y cuidadosos y hay más tormentas altas.

On the email users got, about converting points for KAST Pioneer Units. Let me say this, and then will leave it for you to absorb. —- First - We are super limited in the language we can use, because of country-by-country rules. Use that for context, in what we released. Second - We didn’t just come up with some program out of thin air. The conversion of points to KAST Pioneer Units, came after a long and super expensive process with Tier 1 law firms, and with approvals from investors to create this setup. It literally cost us millions just to setup. We got legal opinions on dozens of countries. Obviously, we would only do this because we are really trying our absolute best to create a strong program for the community. Third - Just to reconfirm. The KAST Pioneer Units, will be issued by a KAST-linked SPV. This is the only practical step for issuance globally. The points will convert to the KAST Pioneer Units. There will be periodic cash out events. We can’t legally promise you the amounts, the dates, whether it goes up or down. No surprise in that. But we are putting in the hard work, so the community gets an outcome aligned to the success of KAST. The only thing you have to do, is quickly accept the conversion, details early December in app. Fourth - Why is there no token? Because no single project in the crypto card or Neobank space in history, has ever delivered a token which is not down. Tokens are almost always not aligned to the community. The founders and team most often end up with a treasury they wholly control, they along with investors cash out, and the token holders deal with the volatility and the ultimate decrease in price. By not launching a token, our team and investors get none of that optionality. They stay locked in equity. To date, I have personally only net purchased equity in KAST and never sold. Launching a token completely counter to our ambition to build a $100B+ company. We believe the KAST Pioneer Units will be the best long term outcome, and in time people will realise this. Finally - We understand that in a market which is very far down, many are looking for anyway to cash out. We get it. There is real pain in crypto prices, many have seen their wealth fall substantially. But still strongly believe the KAST Pioneer Units, issued by the SPV, will ultimately prove to be the right decision. Time be our witness. Thanks all. (Note: I won’t respond to most comments, as I’m keeping to approved language)

A little something that's not mentioned, and ppl may not even think about: Binance did not borrow money Binance did not sell assets Binance did not raise money Binance covered from its balance sheet. This differs from other incidents that people keep wanting to compare to. 🙏

‼️ Ubuntu and Red Hat still have no fix for a Linux kernel flaw that Anthropic says its unreleased AI model turned into a remote root exploit. The bug, CVE-2026-98432, is a use-after-free in the IPv4 TCP handshake, rated 9.8 out of 10. The exploit needs no credentials and targets servers with a multipath TCP listener, which Go 1.24 and later open by default. The fix reached stable kernels on 11 October and Debian has shipped it. Ubuntu still marks every release from 16.04 to 26.10 vulnerable. Red Hat now rates it Critical but has no patched kernel for RHEL 8, 9 or 10. Anthropic has not released the exploit. By its count, it takes 48 minutes to leak a kernel pointer and five more to run commands as root.

1/ Binance exploit just passed 2 days, and so far the attackers (laundering team) have laundered ~$242M through the Tron leg alone, out of the $3.5 billion they still controlled after the freezes. Here is the full analysis of the laundering from my tracing 🧵

‼️ Chainalysis, the firm that tracks crypto hackers, was hacked itself. It told customers in an email seen by ICD that an attacker using "offensive agentic techniques" accessed users' names, emails and role labels. It says this has nothing to do with the $6.3B Binance heist.

Yo me dedico 101% a la seguridad informática y tengo LA CERTEZA de que eventualmente me van a hackear una cuenta, un dispositivo o algo Si creen que ustedes y sus empresas están preparados y seguros, déjenme decirles NO TIENEN NI IDEA DE DONDE ESTÁN PARADOS Lo peor está por venir