upper case letters are tools of capitalist oppression
Joined April 2024
- Tweets28.1K
- Following3.7K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes386K
lowercase retweeted
Most people are not special, rational, or particularly good. They're tribal primates running social scripts, ranking status, and defending comforting lies over evidence. Intelligence, drive, and outcomes are heavily genetic. Equality of result is a fantasy. The average person will never produce anything of lasting value, and the world is carried by a thin minority they resent.
lowercase retweeted
The English are roughly 0.7% of the world’s population. Ethnic English/White British are a smaller slice still.
That is the demographic reality behind the demand for “multiculturalism and diversity” imposed on a people with no other homeland.
England’s population is about 58.8 million (ONS mid-2025). World population is roughly 8.2–8.3 billion.
That puts the people of England at under 0.8% of humanity, call it 1% if you round generously.
The United Kingdom as a whole is ~69.5 million, or about 0.85%. White British (the closest census proxy for ethnic English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish) were 74.4% of England & Wales in the 2021 Census and are projected lower today; that leaves ethnic British natives well under 0.7% of the global population.
Most of the world is already majority non-European.
China, India, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America are not being asked to dissolve their majority ethnic identities, open their borders to the point of demographic transformation, or rebrand their core nationalities so that anyone can claim them.
The pressure is almost entirely one-way: onto the small number of historic European-origin nations, and especially onto the English.
The recent “St George’s bill” (a private member’s bill introduced by Nigerian Liberal Democrat MP Josh Babarinde) is a concrete example.
It proposes adding “Black English” and “Asian English” as census ethnicity options, so that non-White people can tick “English” rather than only “British.”
The argument is that the current form only places “English” under the White category.
The political effect is to detach the word “English” from the historic people who created it and to treat it as an optional identity open to anyone.
Ethnic English people have no other country.
There is no fallback state in which they form the majority.
The same is true, in different degrees, for the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish.
Demographic change that turns a people into a minority in their own ancestral territory is irreversible on any human timescale once it passes certain thresholds.
Framing this as ordinary “diversity” while simultaneously policing English national symbols, holidays and self-description is not neutral policy; it is the selective application of rules that no other major people on earth is required to accept.
It is simply ethnocide and genocide of a native ethnic people, and an invasion of their homeland.
Call it for what it is.
lowercase retweeted
Imagine how dead their souls must be to deny the English their ethnicity, on the same day that the English are remembering their war dead.
Monstrous. Absolutely monstrous.
🚨 WATCH: Andy Burnham suggests he will back Lib Dem proposals to add "Black English" and "Asian English" as options on the census
#PMQs
lowercase retweeted
Everything is more expensive because we are decades into building and funding the biggest welfare state in the history of mankind.
That’s it.
Solved it for you.
lowercase retweeted
“Let’s let non-White people identify as ethnically English in the census.”
Then we won’t know how many ethnically English people there really are in England. Anyone who correctly notices that our number has fallen since the 2021 census could be dismissed as a conspiracy theorist because official statistics might suggest a different story.
This is what you would do if you planned to cover up a genocide.
🏴 Do you have to be White to be English?
I say no.
My St. George’s Bill that I’m putting forward in Parliament on Tuesday will settle this question, once and for all.
Let’s let non-White people identify as ethnically English in the census.
Let’s have this debate out in the Commons.
You in, @SuellaBraverman?
lowercase retweeted
Work 60+ hours a week. Pay tons in taxes. Have an IQ of 100+. Positively contribute to society. Raise good kids who will do the same.
Your vote counts the same as someone who is the complete opposite, and is a net negative to society.
Your society cannot survive like that.
lowercase retweeted
This is such boomer-coded mentality. Performance art levels of not noticing the reality all around you so typical of the media class. Of course young British people wouldn’t fight. Why would they? For what? For who? A country that puts them dead last? A neoliberal grazing strip turned third world doss house welfaremaxxing authoritarian socialist multicultural hellscape?
It may have escaped your notice that virtually this entire group can’t afford a home, they can’t afford kids, they have little to no stake in society. But some illiterate inbred goat herder can arrive here on a dinghy today and be handed a 3-bed new build in bucolic Staffordshire next Tuesday and move his whole family over. And we pay for it. You’re drowning in your own country and the state throws a life jacket to some absolute chancer from the worst place on earth.
Most of the millennial and all the zoomer class basically have been suffering the worst imaginable omnifucking of:
1/ totally out of control immigration of the least culturally compatible units of universally interchangeable humans GDP-go-up cattle on earth
2/ disastrous Labour economic fuckwittery - eg Gosplan inspired wage compression via minimum wage increases, NICs/tax and regs on business
3/ NI-discounted extractive Indian trade deal migration, meeting AI revolution entry-level and lower tier jobspocalypse which means they increasingly can’t get jobs AT ALL.
4/ They all have tens of thousands of pounds of student debt they amassed studying Marx-addled nonsense-slop at ‘universities’ (no longer research institutes but merely Ponzi schemes running mass scale left wing progressive indoctrination) that they will never be able to pay off.
5/ They’re given video games and dating apps to fill the nihilistic void and the least ambitious of all their number are offered a life of low rent tax payer funded indolence and a free car for anxiety or ADHD at absolute best…
And you think if Putin rocked up they’d drop all that righteous grievance (to live the life they were all told they could have - the pursuit of happiness?), that they’re going to miraculously undergo some Damascene conversion and instantly forget all this and instinctively ‘man the barricades’? They’d more likely welcome the Russian despot in as comparatively far more competent leader than these room temperature IQ retards we have running the state now. These moronic charity working, NGO coddled, human rights lawyering, terminally unproductive, never worked a real job, imbecilic pondlife.
What the fuck are you even talking about? Wake up, Swarbrick. Go back to reminiscing about train beers with the lads on the away day to Portsmouth. Jesus wept man you have no idea what you’re talking about here.
‘Unbelievable attitude! We’re screwed then!’
Gen Z caller Josh tells @TomSwarbrick1 not only would he ‘take prison’ over being conscripted into the army, he wouldn’t even cook for the troops.
lowercase retweeted
this is my favorite collectivist conciet:
"imagine if this <insert rich person> had used their <amount of money> on this issue we have spent billions and trillions on for decades with zero positive effect. they could have solved the whole thing!"
it's such a fetching confluence of delusion and a weird faith that if you take the money of effective people and give it to the same people who have squandered every cent they have seen for decades, the money itself will somehow remain impactful as though tripling public school spending has worked to improve education.
it seems to underpin a profound misunderstanding of how to usefully allocate capital combined with an essentially animistic belief that outcome is somehow a property of the money itself and not of the allocator, like somehow musk has some sort of magically effective cash to which NGO's and government agencies are not generally privy.
lowercase retweeted
Why are all the people who were warning of fascism suddenly bragging about the coming show trials, reeducation camps, and nationalization?
lowercase retweeted
I’m being governed by people who have no ties to my land. We are the only idiots in human history to allow this to happen to us
lowercase retweeted
Working at Oculus would have been an utter waste of my time except for one thing.
While I was there, I realized what's wrong with leftists.
Not that they have been programmed, that's obvious. Not why they have been programmed. For power, that's obvious, too.
But how they have been programmed.
The exact method that their moral compass has been destroyed works like this:
Target a bunch of people with very few deeds and accomplishments, such as young people or incompetent people, or incompetent young people.
Create for them an environment where they are rewarded with moral approval, not for what they do, but for believing certain ideas.
The ideas don't have to be outrageous, or absurd, or have anything to do with what you actually need them to believe. In fact, it's better to start with something innocuous.
Why? Because the goal isn't to install those beliefs at all. The goal is to repeat this process until you create a person who measures his moral worth by what he believes, not what he does.
Keep at this until you have created a mass of people who not only reward themselves with a feeling of moral superiority for believing the right things, but who will reward each other for believing orthodox things, and who will compete with each other, not to do the most good, but to have the most orthodox beliefs.
Now, change one of the propositions you have programmed them with to a slightly more radical version of itself, and hold this up as a more correct version of the old belief, which has been newly discovered by scholarly investigations into culture and moral philosophy.
Sit back, watch, and give them a few weeks to compete with each other to adopt the new belief, and to condemn the "evil" of anyone who believes the old belief, the very thing they believed last month.
Repeat this process until they are used to rapidly changing their entire belief system in response to an external cue.
Congratulations, you have a population of entirely programmable people whose moral compass is not just broken, but entirely non-existent.
They don't care what any person in front of them actually does. Only that he believe the orthodox thing, which they just learned about in last week's memo.
They are willing to do anything, so long as it is done in support of their current belief system, which can be replaced whenever it's convenient to do so.
They are willing to burn down an entire city with no qualms whatsoever if they are doing it in support of the idea that black lives matter.
They are willing to murder a man in front of his children, and it doesn't matter if his actions were entirely peaceful and good, because all that matters to them is whether he believes the correct things or not.
And a man who builds cheap spaceflight for the human race, develops viable electric cars to save the environment, restores voices to the voiceless, and plans, for his next trick, to heal the blind... well, all those are deeds, so none of them matter. The only thing that matters is that he told people to vote republican once, which is wrongthink.
So what you have a horde of communist zombies, who can be steered to shuffle in any direction and attack the living, eat their brains, and turn them into more zombies.
Once someone becomes one of the zombies, you can't cure him, because a moral compass can only be repaired by understanding the consequences of actions in a new way... and they don't care about actions or consequences. They only care about beliefs, and not about consequences at all.
Their moral compasses aren't just broken. They are absent. There's nothing to repair.
You have to understand that the zombies are zombies now.
lowercase retweeted
I am an English nationalist.
In a nutshell that means people and country first over anyone.
We all had “mates”.
The argument of the left about the “bubble” is pathetic when most of us have lived and live it.
Most of us who grew up in the later decades of the twentieth century in England lived alongside the children and grandchildren of post-war arrivals.
We went to school with them, played football with them, knew their families.
Some were decent people.
Some were not.
That is ordinary human variation, not a political argument.
The leap from that ordinary experience to a demand that the historic people of this country treat their own continuity as optional is what does not follow.
Knowing that individuals can be sound does not erase the distinction between a people whose ancestors built and sustained a civilisation over centuries and later arrivals whose primary attachments, languages, and kinship networks lie elsewhere.
A birth certificate issued by a modern state does not rewrite ancestry.
Growing up here does not convert someone into a member of the historic population any more than an English child raised in another country becomes a member of that country’s historic people.
The same non-sequitur appears in the claim that “immigrants built Britain.” Individual labour performed inside an already existing society, running a shop, working a trade, serving in the armed forces under the government of the day, does not constitute the founding, the institutions, the language, the common law, or the industrial and naval power that made the country, immigrants factually and evidently never “built” Britain.
Those things predate mass post-war migration.
To treat later participation as equivalent to creation is to collapse the difference between inhabiting a civilisation and producing one.
England is a small island.
The English are a historic people with one homeland and no large external reservoir of their own.
Other groups that have arrived here retain substantial majorities, multiple states, and continuous presence in their places of origin.
The English do not.
That asymmetry is not erased by personal acquaintance, by individual economic activity, or by the legal status conferred on children born on the soil after their parents arrived.
There are good and bad people in every population.
That fact has never, in any serious political tradition, been treated as sufficient reason to dissolve a people’s majority status in their own country or to redefine the country as a collection of interchangeable individuals whose only common bond is paperwork.
Continuity of a people is not hostility to particular persons.
It is the ordinary self-interest every other group on earth is permitted to exercise without apology.
Those who insist otherwise, who treat any defence of English continuity as an attack on their particular friends, and who respond to demographic reality with accusations of racism because the possibility of return or departure for some of those friends is distressing, are simply elevating personal sentiment and identity confusion over the continued existence of a people.
Their discomfort does not rewrite the terms.
English continuity is paramount.
Maintaining it requires decisions and consequences that many prefer not to confront.
Among those is the recognition that later arrivals, including those who are individually decent, still contribute to the numerical and cultural displacement of the historic population.
Continuity of a people is not hostility to particular persons.
It is the ordinary self-interest every other group on earth is permitted to exercise without apology.
lowercase retweeted
No one actually cares about the transatlantic slave trade.
They want “reparations” because it would mean free money.
They don’t care about their “people” or their ancestors. They care about getting a pay out for something no one alive today had any part in.
If anyone actually cared about slavery, they’d be addressing the fact that 50 million people are currently estimated to be enslaved around the world.
21 million are currently estimated to be in forced labour camps and worked to death.
There are current twice as many CHILDREN enslaved around the world than the figure we were given that were supposedly killed during the holocaust.
None of these modern slavery problems are addressed though.
Because that would mean getting off their arses and doing something about it.
However “demanding” reparations takes no effort at all and might result in a pay day.
For this reason, “slavery activists” ignore what’s actually going on today and demand that the conversation focuses solely on historical slavery.
P.S. they should be thankful that the western world gave them our knowledge, technology, medicine and infrastructure.
lowercase retweeted
i am coming to the conclusion that the reason that so many of these college students so rabidly hated charlie is not because of what he said when he was holding the mic but rather what he asked them to say when he handed the mic to them.
there's a stunning incoherence to their views. so angry, so confident, so entitled, and so completely, utterly unable to explain why or what they even believe.
never have so many known so little and yet felt so certain about so much.
there is no capacity for critical thinking or discourse, not even a basic semantic grasp of the concepts.
it's just an entitlement-flavored word salad spewed forth as some talismanic claim to deference and respect.
the greatest vulnerability of the marxist midwiped is being asked to explain what they are talking about.
ask what their magic words mean, why they use them, what they signify, how the problems and processes they posit work.
ask how they would do things.
ask what they are asking for.
the results are amazing.
lowercase retweeted
At the current rate, it won’t be long before they burn the Mona Lisa or take hammers to Michelangelo’s David…
The West is destroying itself because weak leaders don’t want to be called mean names.
lowercase retweeted
"Trans" activism is when you demand to be treated the same as everyone else, but get really angry if you are treated the same as everyone else.
lowercase retweeted
Progressives almost always present themselves as morally righteous because they’ve moved past supposedly divisive and exclusionary ways of politically organizing people by things like religion or nationality.
The only morally acceptable way to organize is around the universal liberal principles of openness, tolerance, equity, diversity, and a bunch of other flowery language that implies everyone belongs anywhere that Progressives themselves wield political power.
But of course, everyone doesn’t belong. We have a litany of people who we know very well are NOT welcome in every utopian project Progressives attempt to construct.
“But so what? Every movement excludes someone. It’s called the paradox of tolerance, chud.”
Yes, but Progressivism doesn’t market itself as just another political movement, does it? It claims to be the application of morality itself, just expressed through politics.
But eventually, reality asserts itself and people see through the facade. The reason Progressives continue to make more and more enemies over time is that their entire political project outright denies the legitimacy of any sort of particularistic political organization, while simultaneously organizing itself as ab extremely particularistic political community.
And why the hell should anyone outside that community grant these people the moral license to rule over them?
