counterpoint: last week my colleague sent me a link to his claude artifact and i said “can you please export this and add it to the git repo” and he asked if i wanted it in pdf or md and things just won’t be the same anymore
the airport lounge is playing terrible AI generated covers of classic songs and this House Of The Rising Sun remake has me feeling particularly bleak
haha when I worked at a hostel we provided free eggs and bread to guests. reviewers complained about this low quality breakfast. so then we stopped providing free eggs and bread and the reviews improved
re: airbnb discourse
in college I worked as a server at an upscale steakhouse. we had a few different steak sauces that were made from scratch daily. they were expensive to make, and less than half of the customers that ordered steak wanted sauce, so the restaurant charged $3 for it
we got complaints constantly. just at my own tables, half a dozen times a week I'd get complaints about being "nickel and dimed" for $3 of sauce on a $70 steak. a few times a month someone would mention it in an angry online review, or ask to speak to a manager and demand that it be removed from the bill because "who the hell charges for condiments?"
after several years of this, finally management had enough. they raised the price of every steak by $3, and now complimentary sauce was included with each steak on request. want to hazard a guess about how many customers complained about the $3 price increase on steak? essentially zero.
it was great, from the restaurants perspective! no more complaints, and instead of making $3 on 40% of steak orderers, they made $3 on all of them. and the customers were much happier, despite this deal being absolutely, unequivocally worse for them.
consumers are not rational agents from microeconomics textbooks. very often the *feeling* of what they're being charged for matters way more than the absolute value of what they're being charged. I think that's more or less what happening with airbnb. people don't want to be charged a cleaning fee and then also told they have to clean, even if in the counterfactual world the additional cleaning fee is more than they'd be willing to pay someone to do the required cleaning. a $100 cleaning fee *feels* better than a $50 cleaning fee + "load the dishwasher and take the trash out to the dumpster", even though most people would not pay $50 to not have to do that.
luba luft retweeted
Theres like more I cant say with char limits but:
While they're both evil & I wish them the worst i think its still beautiful they found love
Nate is evil but it may be worth it for the art he produces
luba luft retweeted
I think You Can See Everything is freaking ppl out cause they cant hold multiple things in their head at once:
1. Both the ppl in the couple are evil
2. The guy is evil in immediately recognizable ways
3. Theyre both actually fully in love
3. Nate is also kinda evil
in 5 years iOS will just be the Accessibility settings menu and nothing else. if you want to do anything on the phone you have to open Settings -> Accessibility and find it there. go fuck yourself
lol it’s real web.archive.org/web/20261010…
deleted my chatgpt dot. I paused it weeks ago bc it was proactively annoying but it kept unpausing itself so now its gone
a lot of people on here seem to be missing this point bc they themselves want to be silicon valley sociopaths. film was incredible tho
A few readers have taken me to task for “missing the point of the film,” which is apparently that Elizabeth Holmes is unknowable and everything is ambiguous. Here’s my response: She went after Tyler Shultz and Erika Cheung with everything she had. I was threatened with litigation on a daily basis for months on end. It was a ruthless cover-up of a breathtaking fraud, and she was at the controls. Just a little context for those who have forgotten or didn’t follow the original story. By the way, I loved the film. #BestPicture, IMO.



















