て 𓆩 † π“†ͺγ€€π—π—π–Ύπ—ˆπ—‹π—’ πŸ™³ π–Ίπ—‡π–Ίπ—…π—’π—Œπ—‚π—Œγ€€βœ§ π–«π—Žπ—π–Ύ π—‚π—Œ 𝖀𝗏𝖾 π—π—‹π—Žπ—π—π–Ύπ—‹γ€€οΈΆγ€€π˜©π‘Žπ‘§π‘π‘–π‘› π˜©π‘œπ‘‘π‘’π‘™ 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐀𝐬𝐑𝐒𝐩 / 𝐃𝐃﹕𝐃𝐍𝐄 π“†ͺ πŸπŸ–+

π—»π—Όπ˜ π˜€π—½π—Όπ—Άπ—Ήπ—²π—Ώ 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲
Joined February 2026
π‹πŽπŽπ“π˜ π–πˆπ“π‡ 𝐓𝐇𝐄 ππŽπŽπ“π˜ retweeted
Here is my "official" guess(es) as to what's going to happen... Potential spoilers(!) ⬇️⬇️⬇️
3
3
19
1,129
π‹πŽπŽπ“π˜ π–πˆπ“π‡ 𝐓𝐇𝐄 ππŽπŽπ“π˜ retweeted
I suspect the storybook is unreliable in not only its narration, but the visuals. Specifically, the Eve'a silhouette may not actually resemble her. I'm NOT suggesting Eve was literally replaced by an impostor during the events themselves, only that the storybook we're +
2
2
6
422
THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN FUCKING SAYING πŸ˜­πŸ˜­πŸ‘πŸ‘
Holy shit Roo might be the apple itself the one that was given to Eve πŸ˜­πŸ˜­πŸ™
3
1
19
366
I've had people ANGRILY insist that no, she's NOT the apple, so to finally see other people putting the pieces together... OH MY GOD. YES. PLEASE. MORE OF THIS!!! Roo, you can't show up fast enough 😩😩😩πŸ₯Ή
1
4
83
Can I ask, unironically, why was it perfectly acceptable for people to discuss the Lilith/Eve theory as though it were canon, something people STILL do to this day, but suddenly it's a problem when I express that same confidence in Lute being Eve? +
6
1
8
362
Because there are plenty of theories I personally don't care for, but you're not going to catch me combing through the tags looking for posts to complain about. Even if something happens to appear on my For You page, I'll address it in my own post if I feel strongly enough +
1
3
47
about it. I see absolutely no reason to bombard someone else's post just because I disagree with their interpretation. What exactly is the point of that? What are you hoping to accomplish?
3
44
Meanwhile, the Lute/Eve theory has two separate instances of Jessica Vosk, Lute's actual voice actress who is STILL involved with the show, indirectly confirming the exact theory (not a vague suggestion, but the actual Lute/Eve theory). +
1
4
68
Clearly, one has a stronger basis than the othe. So why is it that people can confidently discuss Lilith/Eve as though it's established fact, but when we approach Lute/Eve with that same level of confidence, suddenly it's "You shouldn't treat that as canon?" 🀨
1
3
59
You're conflating character introduction with character establishment. Sera's appearance in the opening is a visual introduction, even if her name, identity, & role aren't established until later. Foreshadowing & introduction aren't mutually exclusive narrative devices. +
Replying to @lutesaurus
Yeah, Sera wasn't introduced in the opening, she was foreshadowed or teased. She was properly introduced in S1E6. Plus, her own silhoutte was actually doing stuff and appeared twice, unlike the brief and vague appearance of the entities' silhouettes.
2
3
198
A character can be visually introduced while their *significance* is being teased for a later reveal. Foreshadowing involves hinting at a future narrative development. Just depicting a character before formally identifying them is a visual introduction with +
1
1
86
delayed identification. Those are different storytelling techniques. Roo has both been introduced by name, visually shown & her role foreshadowed.
1
31
Okay, so if I'm understanding correctly, the issue, from what I can gather on the timeline, is specifically the name? So if we replaced β€œGood” & β€œEvil” with, I don't know, β€œBetty” & β€œBeatrice,” would that have solved anything? Again, whether a word can also function as a +
2
1
3
294
You know what's funniest about all this? People are fighting tooth & nail to argue that β€œRoo” doesn't necessarily mean β€œRoot of Evil,” or that β€œEvil” somehow doesn't count as a name. Yet this SAME fandom was up in arms believing β€œAltruist” was Alastor's actual last name. 😭 +
2
1
57