amor fati et memento mori
the abyss
Joined March 2024
- Tweets20.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers3.2K
- Likes108K
Pinned Tweet
I'm well aware of what the catechism states, but you are making a claim about the interior knowledge and disposition of 500k+ people, which you blatantly do not have. I don't even need to get into an SSPX defense here as you're just wrong on your own premises.
CCC 846 is contingent on two things: knowing the Church is necessary, and refusing her anyway. The knowledge is definitionally an interior act, which, as you surely know, while we can judge that an act is gravely wrong, we must entrust judgment of specific persons to God (per CCC 1861).
Even when the matter is grave, a sin is only mortal with full knowledge and deliberate consent, which are both also interior dispositions...
Ignorance, habituation, coercion and the pressure of circumstances can reduce an individuals culpability (according to CCC 1735). You have literally no access to what any of those people know or their interior dispositions or intentions, and neither does literally anyone else.
Therefore; your claim "we can be sure they're in hell" is not a remotely Orthodox application of CCC 846. It is fundamentally a claim to know hearts, which the Church says we cannot do. I'd also highly recommend since you love pulling out quotes from the catechism, to look up catechism 2477 :). Might be instructive!
Go ahead and reblock me now thanks bye!
Read CCC 846. It states that those who know the church is true but refuse to remain in her "could not be saved." That is as blunt as it can get and it perfectly describes the SSPX. I agree with Our Lady of Fatima that we should pray that God "leads all souls to heaven" but I also believe we should believe the CCC.
Majorian retweeted
When you ask Daily Wire bros "What is a woman" vs when you ask them "What is an American"
Coward got ratioed so hard he won't even quote tweet me...
Notice he still didn't respond to my full argument...
Full argument is here btw, don't be a pussy, explain what I said here that is wrong, or retract your claim that I believe fulfills the textbook definition of rash judgement.
I'm well aware of what the catechism states, but you are making a claim about the interior knowledge and disposition of 500k+ people, which you blatantly do not have. I don't even need to get into an SSPX defense here as you're just wrong on your own premises.
CCC 846 is contingent on two things: knowing the Church is necessary, and refusing her anyway. The knowledge is definitionally an interior act, which, as you surely know, while we can judge that an act is gravely wrong, we must entrust judgment of specific persons to God (per CCC 1861).
Even when the matter is grave, a sin is only mortal with full knowledge and deliberate consent, which are both also interior dispositions...
Ignorance, habituation, coercion and the pressure of circumstances can reduce an individuals culpability (according to CCC 1735). You have literally no access to what any of those people know or their interior dispositions or intentions, and neither does literally anyone else.
Therefore; your claim "we can be sure they're in hell" is not a remotely Orthodox application of CCC 846. It is fundamentally a claim to know hearts, which the Church says we cannot do. I'd also highly recommend since you love pulling out quotes from the catechism, to look up catechism 2477 :). Might be instructive!
Go ahead and reblock me now thanks bye!
This is not to say that you guys shouldn't also be improving your rizz tho lol
While is true that there a small portion of cath guys that are rizzless chuds, that doesn't deflect from the great many "catholic" girls that are unrepentant fornicators/feminists.
Both of those issues are far worse than our lovable awkward incel with no game. But notice you will see far more posts going after the incel, than the thot...
While is true that there a small portion of cath guys that are rizzless chuds, that doesn't deflect from the great many "catholic" girls that are unrepentant fornicators/feminists.
Both of those issues are far worse than our lovable awkward incel with no game. But notice you will see far more posts going after the incel, than the thot...
Majorian retweeted
Counterpoint: "International Law" is just how we explain the United States Navy to children and invalids, and the Navy ain't gonna do anything to stop him.
馃嚟馃嚬馃嚫馃嚮 脌 ceux qui pensent que Nayib Bukele peut intervenir militairement en Ha茂ti 脿 la suite de la 芦disparition 禄 des quatre militaires salvadoriens, je tiens 脿 rappeler ceci :
La volont茅 l茅gitime du pr茅sident salvadorien de sauver ses quatre militaires ne saurait justifier une intervention militaire unilat茅rale en Ha茂ti, en violation de sa souverainet茅 nationale.
La lutte contre les gangs ne saurait devenir un pr茅texte pour contourner le droit international. Toute op茅ration militaire doit s鈥檌nscrire dans un cadre juridique clairement 茅tabli, conform茅ment au mandat de la Force de r茅pression des gangs (FRG) et aux dispositions de la Charte des Nations unies.
La gravit茅 de la situation s茅curitaire en Ha茂ti ne suspend ni le droit international ni la souverainet茅 du pays.
Nancy Roc
#Haiti #Salvador #Souverainet茅 #InterventionMilitaire
Majorian retweeted
Not just thin, but also reasonably strong
1RM on barbell bench press of--BARE MINIMUM--125% body weight. That's bare minimum for acceptability
