This is all well and good, but none of the big picture questions about the nature of truth matter if there isn't some essential question about Holmes and her intentions/culpability.
I have no idea what "feel" is meant to mean here but it seems pretty much substance free.
As much as "upside picks" exist in the new lottery environment, the Spurs have some. Sacramento, Minnesota, and Dallas all 4 or 5 years out.
You can rule out the bad teams. Contender-ish teams that would go after Jokic:
1) OKC - Chet + picks. They have volume but only the 2028 Dallas pick has any upside (2027 clipps pick too but bad draft) + Chet’s contract is eh
2) Spurs - weird fit + are they including Harper? No upside picks
3) Pistons - Ausar on a max extension + their own picks?
4) Lakers - 0 picks
5) Wolves - pick poor
6) Philly - Jaylen + clipps picks + own picks (ironically not terrible but Embiid exisiting makes it probably a no)
7) Knicks - Towns + stuff is intriguing, but again only have their own picks
8) Cavs - Mobley + their own picks is something
9) Rockets - if they are willing to do Amen then a package could get juicy
Can’t be bothered to keep going but there’s no one that is blowing the competition out of the water imo. Not saying the Celtics would be THE front runner. But they have high value picks + their own picks + a bunch of young talent to build a very competitive package.
Matthew Hibbing retweeted
back at @TheAVClub asking the important questions, like, why do movies look like that now? spoke to a bunch of cinematographers, colorists, and editors to try to figure out what is going on: avclub.com/why-do-movies-loo…
This is an oddly definite claim from someone who is scolding all the replies for failing to appreciate the nuance of the situation.





