Building products. Growing ecosystems┆@hamieverse
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined November 2010
- Tweets59.4K
- Following4.2K
- Followers6.5K
- Likes80.7K
Pinned Tweet
I finally did it.
Bought my first Mutant Ape. 🧪
Watching ApeFest from the sidelines, I couldn't help but feel a little FOMO.
For years, friends have told me how incredible the Ape community is. How they show up for each other, support each other, and make you feel like you're part of something bigger.
And honestly, seeing that energy around ApeFest made me want to experience it for myself.
Then Yuga dropped Mudwater.
A trading card game, bringing collecting, gaming, and community together. Seeing that unfold while we're building something we're incredibly passionate about at Hamieverse made the timing feel almost perfect.
I've always believed the strongest communities in crypto are built around shared experiences, not just floor prices.
So here I am. New PFP, new community, same passion for building.
Guess I'm a Mutant now.
Meta retweeted
Building cool shit?
Join us today for our weekly Burrow Banter and share what you're building!
We'll cover interesting things happening in the space, discover new builders, all that while having fun
4 PM EST. Set your reminders below 👇
🤖 Made with AI
Valid question, but I would argue that sinks are not the solution to the economic problem. I believe the solution lies in how the liquidity pool and its underlying mechanics are designed.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again.
Every Web3 gaming token dies the same way, and it's not necessarily because the game is bad. It's because the economics are blind.
The standard playbook is simple. Mint a fixed supply, schedule emissions, and reward players for grinding.
The problem? Emissions are completely disconnected from demand.
Bear market? Still emitting.
Players losing interest? Still emitting.
Liquidity drying up? Still emitting.
Supply enters circulation on a predictable schedule while demand fluctuates. Eventually, that imbalance becomes the chart we've all seen a hundred times.
And that's where the real problem begins.
Rational players have no incentive to hold an asset they know will be continuously diluted. So they farm and sell. Not because they're bad actors, but because the economics incentivize that behavior.
Then projects introduce sinks. Burn this, stake that, lock something else.
But a sink that drains less than the faucet produces doesn't solve the problem. It just slows down the inevitable.
The solution isn't simply finding more ways to burn tokens. It's designing an economy where liquidity, emissions, and incentives respond to actual market conditions.
Until we stop treating token emissions as a calendar event and start treating them as a function of real demand and liquidity, we'll keep repeating the same cycle.
The problem isn't that players extract value. The problem is that the economy is designed to reward extraction.
AND
This is now possible with a v4hook.
Everyone talks tokens, nobody talks sinks.
Gaming token this, gaming token that.
Having a token is all good & well but how have so few games got true token sinks?
For the people that don't know, a sink takes tokens OUT of circulation:
Repairs. Crafting. Upgrades. Cosmetics.
No sinks = price dumps.
Rewards get players in.
Sinks keep the economy alive.
What's the best sink you've seen in a game?
A lot of projects talk about community. Many of them have good intentions.
But intentions are not the same as actions.
Let's rewind the clock to the Hamieverse Genesis mint.
I still remember reading the first announcement. The team had decided to take ZERO team allocation, choosing instead to give those mint spots directly to the community.
And this was from an already limited supply of just 888 NFTs. A free mint.
Fast forward six months.
Hamieverse had bought back an insane number of Genesis NFTs. You might assume those were bought to build the project's treasury.
You'd be wrong.
They went straight back to the community. Over $20,000 worth given back to the people who make this project what it is.
Now look at today's announcement.
150 Genesis NFTs added to the Hamieverse treasury, purchased from a community member to support the next stage of growth on Ethereum.
And guess where those NFTs will eventually end up?
Right back in the hands of the community.
See the pattern?
Community isn't something you put in your bio. It's something you demonstrate through your actions, consistently, even when nobody is watching.
You can tell someone a gem is a gem only so many times. Eventually, they either recognize its value or dismiss it as expensive glass.
But Hamieverse isn't just a gem.
It's a diamond in the rough.
I'm not here to convince you. The actions speak for themselves, and sooner or later, people will see what has been right in front of them all along.
All roads lead to the Hamieverse. 🐹
Is this good chat? 👀
I have been one of the biggest supporters of @playcambria for as long as I can remember.
I use to rant about it in discord VC's until people started making fun of me.
This Thursday I get to say, "I told you so" and its gonna feel good.
Meta retweeted
Hamieverse Gamenight + NFT Giveaway xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1YxNrbMXW…
🤝 Paid partnership
It's your lucky day if you come across this post.
Pull up tonight for a chance to win a Hamieverse NFT.
3PM EST in the Hamieverse discord.
HAMIEVERSE GAMENIGHT + NFT GIVEAWAY
join us in the @hamieverse discord every Thursday for our weekly gamenights!
play some games with us, gets alpha, and come for a chance to win prizes!
GIVEAWAY: 1 x Hamie NFT to those that participate!
🗓️Today, October 22nd at 3pm EST/7pm UTC!
87% chose to move their assets to ETH for migration.
The community might be small for now, but this is one of the strongest communities in web3.
Bullish on the Hamieverse!
Bullish on where we are heading!
I spent over $1 MILLION building Hamieverse before asking the community for a single dollar.
That was intentional.
Web3 has spent years selling promises.
I wanted to build first.
Judge us on what exists, not what we say is coming.
Promises are cheap.
Execution is everything.
ENTERTAINMENT WITH PURPOSE
Meta retweeted
What's going on in the market right now? Is Web3 gaming making a comeback?
Join us for our weekly Burrow Banter space at 3 PM EST to discuss all the good, bad, and exciting things happening across the space
Set your reminders below. See you there! 👇
SNP put 80% of its supply into what it calls a "diamond-hand" drop for Standard Reserve charter holders. Your full share is paid only when your charter exits, which burns the charter and every branch on it.
How many bankers took the paycheck? I traced every charter burn since the drop on-chain.
5 charters out of ~867 active. 27 branches out of 3,637.
All five sold 100% of the SNP they claimed.
Here's each one. "In" = what that wallet paid for the charter + every $STANDARD it ever deposited, at the ETH value when deposited. "Out" = everything it held after exit: SNP sale proceeds + $STANDARD returned after the exit fee.
• #188 (2 branches): 0.15 → 0.96 ETH (+542%)
• #563 (3 branches): 0.41 → 1.38 ETH (+236%)
• #711 (9 branches): 3.96 → 5.87 ETH (+48%)
• #781 (3 branches): 1.47 → 1.97 ETH (+34%)
• #614 (10 branches): 6.10 → 4.90 ETH (−20%)
Combined: 12.1 ETH in, 15.1 ETH out. +2.99 ETH.
That's the headline. Here's what's under it:
1. 84% of the 15.1 ETH out was SNP. Strip the drop and the same five exits return 2.4 ETH on 12.1 in. An 80% loss on the banking position itself.
2. All five exited while the resolution fee was 53–56%. That cost them ~2.1 ETH combined, 70% of the group's entire profit. The drop stays claimable for 12 months. Nothing forced an exit at peak fee.
3. #188 sold its seat for 0.96 ETH total. The lowest charter auction clear since then is 1.2 ETH. It cashed out below the cost of buying back in, before rebuilding a single branch.
4. The largest of the five, #614 with 10 branches, lost 1.2 ETH with the airdrop included. The more branches you hold, the more an exit costs you.
99.3% of the SNP drop is still sitting with bankers who stayed.
Every launch that drops to charters raises the price of the seat. Exits are priced against that.
Bankers in control. 🏦
Pay attention to those innovative mechanics emerging on Robinhood chain… this protocol is going to print millionaires.
As an example, SNP launched recently on robinhood:0x88ad8ddf1e3898412146a534538d418c6f8a9062 and I was airdropped $8k to my charter (down to $4k as some Charters exited and sold)
Would I burn my charter to access those coins?
Absolutely not.
Charters are going for 4 ETH ($10k) each, not to mention the 50k STANDARD ($11.5k) I’ve spent for my existing branches
So cumulative airdrops would need to equal AT LEAST $25k before any rational human would entertain this, meaning anyone bundling 80% of their token launch to charters is locking a large portion of supply up on day 1
But even then I’m earning $100k/year in STANDARD issuance, and this protocol has built deep liquidity with a lot of potential around outside yields on stocks… what happens when tokenized stock yield are distributed to charter holders?
Honestly I personally wouldn’t consider burning my charter and exiting until at least 6 figs, if at all
Then there’s the liquid STANDARD… I can lock it up like a bond, hold until maturity and earn 5% additional STANDARD which also seems like a logical play as more Charter holders want more branches to get access to larger airdrops
Bankers in control, and it ain’t Wall Street this time… wait until silly season returns
It wouldn’t surprise me if Charter auction hit 6 figs like the daily NounsDao auctions back in 2021
