Thomas Willett, a known anti-gay trans rights advocate, is once again showing his homophobia by conflating gay sexuality with fetishization.
Fetishists exist in all sexualities not just gay people. Don't make your kink your entire public persona if you don't want it criticized.
Why do trans activists (99% who dont have a dsd or intersex condition) always lean on intersex people as if their conditiin somehow justifies their own self identities. teapawt.org/yallweekly/status/2116…
This pretty much summarizes the near systemic attack, by progressives and leftists, against gay and lesbian individuals and our sexuality in general.
Stonewall has shifted from a bastion of gay rights to one of its most ardent persecutors, in the name of inclusion + trans rights
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
this argument is being made while over half of transwomen in prison were convicted of sexual violence against women.
Only a tiny minority of men have ever been a threat to women, yet despite that, we've permitted women-only spaces for decades. Transwomen are no exception.
No one's being told to dismantle any protections. You can't think or write about this logically. What we know, is that trans people represent a negligible threat to women. As in practically zero. It is illogical to assume that a tiny minority of people, who've existed since humans have existed on this planet, are suddenly a threat to women. Please get your eyes back on the prize.
straight female telling gay men that it's okay to be bi, if we would just stop being afraid of having our sexuality challenged.
anti-gay #ConversionTherapy is a left wing ideal, now.
Devin retweeted
When my daughter was born she was immediately diagnosed with CAH, a rare hormonal disorder. This prompted us to test our son, who had it too. They both have the virilizing form, which meant their bodies were making too many male hormones.
My son was beginning to show signs of entering puberty at age six. Our only option was puberty blockers, Lupron, big nasty shots, everyday, for nearly 8 years.
Before we began they sat us down for half an hour and explained why, even though this was his best option at a normal life, there were lots of possible side effects and negative outcomes, including kidney failure, physical and neurological developmental problems and a host of others. No one once said it was easy or just a "pause" on puberty. Instead they stressed the seriousness of the treatment. I am happy to say they are both healthy adults today.
So when I started hearing people describe puberty blockers as simple, or just a pause, or easily reversible, with no serious side effects, I knew immediately that was false. How could they get away with saying that, even in the press? Well, when a drug is declared "safe" by the FDA it can be used for any off label purpose. Even though the seriousness of the treatment was known for people with prostate cancer and conditions like my kids had, there simply were no studies at the time for the express purpose of transition. This gave them the fig leaf to say that it was "safe" when every reputable person knew that was false.
So I have known for a long time that the entire trans craze was built on falsehoods.
This woman needs to be voted out and kept away from all institutions of power. You buy insurance as a last stop gap in the event of an unforseen loss, including theft.
If someone wants to come steal your property, you should just let them do it because you have insurance.
That's what the NDP wants. And they say so openly.
Meet the real NDP. Radical. Reckless. Out-of-Touch.: meetthendp.ca
But its still youre right and responsibility to be proactive in mitigating or stopping such losses before they occur.
This woman would see all of our insurance premiums skyrocket, and see thieves empowered to continue stealing and harming people with her policies and words.
We're you upset when Afghanis couldn't vote in US elections during their occupation?
this is the type of guy who should've been upset that Afghanis couldn't vote in US elections during the war on terror. But he wasnt.
Because he's an antisemite.
Devin retweeted
BREAKING: U.N. rapporteur Francesca Albanese says uniformed Hamas terrorists posing as journalists are not legitimate targets. “Having been photographed with a uniform doesn’t make the journalist killable... even assuming that Israel had a right to self-defense — and it doesn’t.”
Devin retweeted
BREAKING: Francesca Albanese, Hamas’ de facto U.N. spokesperson, gets rebuked after her presentation by a cross-regional coalition including the United States, Italy, Argentina, Romania, Bulgaria, Czechia, and Fiji.
Argentina: “The objectivity is questionable. The report overlooks the military use of civilian infrastructure such as schools by Hamas and other terrorist groups.”
Fiji: “Resolution 5/2 binds every mandate holder to impartiality and restraint. A pattern of public commentary has in our assessment moved outside that code.”
Romania: “The issue of antisemitism as well as Holocaust distortion and denial are top priorities for my country.”
Italy: “The independence and credibility of the mandates are best served by the consistent respect and application of the Code of Conduct.”
Bulgaria: “It is essential that special rapporteurs be guided in their work by the Code of Conduct for special procedure mandate holders of the Human Rights Council and uphold the principles of independence, impartiality, objectivity, balance, and non-selectivity.”
Czechia: “We wish to underline the importance of impartiality, accuracy, and due consideration of the historical context in the special rapporteur's work.”
Are posters like this just psyops trying to split the gays from the genderqueers? Because this homophobic conversion therapy-adjacent rhetoric is going to drive gays away from trans people faster than Marsha's legs spread.
They did. They even bought much of the property at inflated rates. the British actually gave them the worst and least populated regions when Israel was initially founded, and Israel asked the arabs to stay and build the country with them. Many stayed, and many left
