Are there examples where reliving past glories a decade or so later worked out?

Genuine question, accepting submissions: Other examples of beating three players in a 2-3m radius , other than Kolbe, the greatest hot-stepper in history? (Not run over, stepped through)

Bulls have three Springbok hookers and infinity loose forwards Thin stocks at center and TH Yet they are getting Kwagga and Marx while shedding Wilco and David Kriel Their ways are not our ways

Welsh rugby is finally getting over the post-golden generation slump and it’s a welcome development for the URC and Test rugby and just the way things ought to be

80m but still… Straight into Elite Player Development with him

“When we played South Africa, we were equally as good, if not better, players on an individual skill set level. But in terms of physicality, they were way better than us and it showed in the final result.” This has been the case in just about every post-isolation Test we won against NZ, France, Australia, or Ireland

Nextgen had superior skills coaching between 14-18 A time when the brain (where skills lie) is uniquely receptive to learning and forming hardwired neural pathways That gap is difficult if not impossible to close

What?!

Bester is excellent in the air a trait highly valued in Bokland

Wessels testified that he tried to throw Murphy off of him For that action his movement was not unnatural Unless you choose to believe Murphy ( who got a te card (but no ban!) for punching Wessels in the head In fact, the Wessels case shoukd be less clear because Murphy had obvious reason to lie, unlike Coombs

Looks like the Bulls are getting Temu Marx

Yes, the JHW and Coombes cases are not identical — there is more clearly hand near groin here Argument in JHW case was Josh Murphy would never lie and there might have been a hand near groin Are Leinstermen calling Coombes a liar? Both cases are not enough for a ban in my and your opinion and I’m sure you made these most sensible arguments then too Unless you mean they are nothing alike because the accused was not Irish then yes you are right And from here it seems to be the dispositive factor Would be shocked if there is a single South African that disagrees with moi While half of Ireland appears to disagree with vous and want the perp banned for life in this case People are biased, who knew Except moi — serenely objective

If a billionaire’s goal is to foster social cohesion and cause the greatest joy for the greatest number of people, on a utilitarian calculus… then there is no better way to spend his money than bringing back our best rugby players and coaches for the noble cause of kicking French and Irish ass

Big if true

To be clear: Not in favor of witch hunts or bans without proof beyond reasonable doubt (and for mine giving little weight to victim statement , for reasons), benefit of the doubt and all that But salty salty salty about JHW still so sue me