BTC에 미친 사나이

Binance CEO Richard Teng confirms attackers used Ethereum's EIP-7702 delegation mechanism to gain execution authority over a Binance hot wallet. The exploit bypassed the exchange's normal transaction controls.

今天都在说币安被盗事件 然后都说OKX没有被盗过 结果今晚就被黑客光顾了 半小时不见1.72亿U，钱包还是为知名钱包 这些没得找回了

Binance has committed its own balance sheet to making customers whole. I expect it to deliver. Our industry will learn from this incident, strengthen security, and emerge stronger and more resilient.

하필 이름이 같아서..

북한은 러시아에 고기방패로 병사 2만 명 넘게 보내는 대가로 약 8,700억 원 받음 근데 북한 해커 박진혁 씹새가 바이비트랑 바이낸스 털어서 번돈은 약 11조 원임 ㅋㅋ 병사 2만 명 넘게 보내서 벌 돈의 13배를 이새끼가 해킹 두 번으로 털었음 혼자서 0.1 삼성전자 순이익 한거임 ㅋㅋ

Elon, have a lot of respect for you, but bad time to troll. Please stop. Our SPCX shares (from our $500m investment in your Twitter takeover) are worth more than a billion. Would appreciate if you show a little support. Thanks!

이더리움 스테이킹보상 50% 급등한 이유. 1. 바이낸스해킹으로 빠져나간 자금의 종착역 = 이더리움 임. 2. 이더리움으로 전환에 성공하면 해커입장에서는 작전성공이라고 봄. 3. 이번 바이낸스해킹자금이 이더리움으로 들어오면서 스테이킹보상이 50% 급등함. 결론 : 이더리움만큼 보안이 강력한 체인은 없다. 근데, 이게 장점만 있는건 아닌거 같다. 끝. ethereum:native

북한은 러시아에 고기방패로 병사 2만 명 넘게 보내는 대가로 약 8,700억 원 받음 근데 북한 해커 박진혁 씹새가 바이비트랑 바이낸스 털어서 번돈은 약 11조 원임 ㅋㅋ 병사 2만 명 넘게 보내서 벌 돈의 13배를 이새끼가 해킹 두 번으로 털었음 혼자서 0.1 삼성전자 순이익 한거임 ㅋㅋ

Greatest on chain trader of all time, +6 billion to the PnL.

I suspect IBIT is already on North Korea’s shortlist. In February 2025, the attackers behind the Bybit hack compromised a Safe{Wallet} developer’s Mac through a malicious project disguised as legitimate Docker-related tooling. They had access for 17 days before the theft, giving them enough time to manipulate the transaction interface used by Bybit’s signers. The signers believed they were approving a legitimate transaction. Instead, they unknowingly authorized the theft of $1.5 billion from a cold wallet. The keys could stay offline while the signers approved a theft through a compromised interface. TRM Labs attributes the recent Binance incident with high confidence to TraderTraitor, the North Korean group also linked to Bybit and the theft of 4,502.9 BTC from DMM Bitcoin. Binance’s preliminary investigation points to a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop as the entry point. Binance says there’s no evidence that private keys were leaked, while TRM’s analysis suggests the attackers may have gained control of the signing infrastructure. If confirmed, the attackers could have moved funds through a compromised approval process without extracting the keys. Now imagine the same thing happening to IBIT. BlackRock’s IBIT is the world’s largest Bitcoin ETF, holding roughly 815,000 BTC worth around $63 billion. Coinbase remains its active Bitcoin custodian. Although Anchorage Digital has been appointed as an additional custodian, the fund’s latest quarterly filing says there are currently no plans to transfer any Bitcoin there. That’s an extraordinary concentration of Bitcoin under one custodian. Regardless of how large or well-funded that provider is, a critical failure in its security infrastructure could put the entire fund at risk. A $6 billion theft would wipe out roughly 9.5% of IBIT’s assets, equivalent to around $4 per share at current valuations. Binance managed to freeze some stolen stablecoins. Bitcoin has no such mechanism, making stolen BTC far harder to recover. BlackRock doesn’t separately insure the Bitcoin held by the fund. Coinbase has disclosed $320 million in commercial crime insurance coverage, shared across its customers. Its custody agreement also limits liability to $100 million per cold storage address, with any recovery subject to contractual terms, liability determinations, and other conditions. If a major theft occurred and the fund couldn’t recover the Bitcoin or obtain sufficient compensation, the remaining losses would ultimately be borne by IBIT shareholders. Bitcoin ETFs have made owning Bitcoin much more accessible, and there’s real value in that convenience. But as more capital flows into these products, enormous amounts of Bitcoin are also being concentrated among a handful of custodians and the infrastructure they depend on. The larger these pools become, the more attractive they are to attackers. A compromise at any critical point could have consequences far beyond a single institution. And that’s why security has no finish line. Even the most sophisticated cold storage setup still depends on hardware, software, supply chains, signing workflows, and the people operating them. Keeping private keys offline is essential, but it doesn’t eliminate the risks surrounding the transaction approval process. Spread your assets across independent custody setups. Keep your private keys offline. Verify transaction details on a trusted device screen, independently of the computer initiating the transaction. Continuously review your security architecture, and build it around the assumption that some part of your infrastructure will eventually be compromised. There are no silver bullets in security, and no permanent guarantees. Stay vigilant, keep verifying, and never mistake a clean track record for proof that you’re safe. Bunker mode.

아니 근데 설마 얘네 자금이 나중에 우리 머리 위로 날라오는 미사일로 스왑되는 거 아니겠죠? 어?