web3 culture architect • photographer • curating signals • shaping narratives • project coverage & collabs • dm open
Joined May 2021
- Tweets98.2K
- Following4.1K
- Followers6.6K
- Likes129K
gn
if you love nfts, remember that you won't always have the chance to collect everything. just like most people will never own a cryptopunk.
don't blindly follow newly famous kols or buy just because they're buying.
pay attention to the OGs. support the long time builders who are still active, creating and contributing.
stay close to the people who build, not just the ones who get attention.
➖ vyre
the nft market is not just losing value. it is losing trust.
a new kind of influencer has emerged.
they arrive overnight, make big purchases, run huge giveaways, build fast fame and create the image of being major collectors.
then, just days later, they launch their own collections.
people buy in. they follow their moves, trust their calls and buy the other projects they promote.
but what happens next?
the same creators start promoting and buying other collections, while their followers keep holding the bags.
there are growing concerns about hidden wallets, coordinated activity and people selling through accounts their followers don't even know about.
some walk away with huge profits. others are left holding collections with no real art, no team, no content and no lasting vision.
and this is where the damage goes beyond money.
capital and attention are being pulled away from projects built around real art and communities.
projects like @normiesART , @ChimpersHQ , @D3lMundos , @OriginalBlokyz , @FugzOfficial , @goodvibesclub and @freedznft deserve to be seen for what they have built, not buried under artificial hype.
the problem is not that every new project is bad, or that every influencer is dishonest.
the problem is a market where manufactured hype can be more valuable than years of genuine work.
buyers also need to be more careful, but the greater responsibility belongs to those who use their influence to create trust while hiding their own financial interests.
the nft market needs more transparency:
- clear disclosure of financial interests.
- accountability for creators and influencers.
- more scrutiny of suspicious wallet activity.
- real consequences for market manipulation.
lower prices do not kill a market.
the loss of trust does.
if we keep rewarding this behavior, we will keep pushing real artists and communities out of the spotlight.
and eventually, there may be nothing left worth coming back to.
➖ vyre
vyre retweeted
This
Don’t always Chase next mint, don’t Chase next extraction
Invest in a project which is building, where the founder is present every single day and participate to this project = give your opinion, support, explain on the timeline
I know everyone is looking for the next x10 or x100, but sometimes it is far more pleasant to own a NFT of a good project than buying every single shitty NFT because one KOL hyped it
👇
the nft market is not just losing value. it is losing trust.
a new kind of influencer has emerged.
they arrive overnight, make big purchases, run huge giveaways, build fast fame and create the image of being major collectors.
then, just days later, they launch their own collections.
people buy in. they follow their moves, trust their calls and buy the other projects they promote.
but what happens next?
the same creators start promoting and buying other collections, while their followers keep holding the bags.
there are growing concerns about hidden wallets, coordinated activity and people selling through accounts their followers don't even know about.
some walk away with huge profits. others are left holding collections with no real art, no team, no content and no lasting vision.
and this is where the damage goes beyond money.
capital and attention are being pulled away from projects built around real art and communities.
projects like @normiesART , @ChimpersHQ , @D3lMundos , @OriginalBlokyz , @FugzOfficial , @goodvibesclub and @freedznft deserve to be seen for what they have built, not buried under artificial hype.
the problem is not that every new project is bad, or that every influencer is dishonest.
the problem is a market where manufactured hype can be more valuable than years of genuine work.
buyers also need to be more careful, but the greater responsibility belongs to those who use their influence to create trust while hiding their own financial interests.
the nft market needs more transparency:
- clear disclosure of financial interests.
- accountability for creators and influencers.
- more scrutiny of suspicious wallet activity.
- real consequences for market manipulation.
lower prices do not kill a market.
the loss of trust does.
if we keep rewarding this behavior, we will keep pushing real artists and communities out of the spotlight.
and eventually, there may be nothing left worth coming back to.
➖ vyre
vyre retweeted
the nft market is not just losing value. it is losing trust.
a new kind of influencer has emerged.
they arrive overnight, make big purchases, run huge giveaways, build fast fame and create the image of being major collectors.
then, just days later, they launch their own collections.
people buy in. they follow their moves, trust their calls and buy the other projects they promote.
but what happens next?
the same creators start promoting and buying other collections, while their followers keep holding the bags.
there are growing concerns about hidden wallets, coordinated activity and people selling through accounts their followers don't even know about.
some walk away with huge profits. others are left holding collections with no real art, no team, no content and no lasting vision.
and this is where the damage goes beyond money.
capital and attention are being pulled away from projects built around real art and communities.
projects like @normiesART , @ChimpersHQ , @D3lMundos , @OriginalBlokyz , @FugzOfficial , @goodvibesclub and @freedznft deserve to be seen for what they have built, not buried under artificial hype.
the problem is not that every new project is bad, or that every influencer is dishonest.
the problem is a market where manufactured hype can be more valuable than years of genuine work.
buyers also need to be more careful, but the greater responsibility belongs to those who use their influence to create trust while hiding their own financial interests.
the nft market needs more transparency:
- clear disclosure of financial interests.
- accountability for creators and influencers.
- more scrutiny of suspicious wallet activity.
- real consequences for market manipulation.
lower prices do not kill a market.
the loss of trust does.
if we keep rewarding this behavior, we will keep pushing real artists and communities out of the spotlight.
and eventually, there may be nothing left worth coming back to.
➖ vyre
the nft market is not just losing value. it is losing trust.
a new kind of influencer has emerged.
they arrive overnight, make big purchases, run huge giveaways, build fast fame and create the image of being major collectors.
then, just days later, they launch their own collections.
people buy in. they follow their moves, trust their calls and buy the other projects they promote.
but what happens next?
the same creators start promoting and buying other collections, while their followers keep holding the bags.
there are growing concerns about hidden wallets, coordinated activity and people selling through accounts their followers don't even know about.
some walk away with huge profits. others are left holding collections with no real art, no team, no content and no lasting vision.
and this is where the damage goes beyond money.
capital and attention are being pulled away from projects built around real art and communities.
projects like @normiesART , @ChimpersHQ , @D3lMundos , @OriginalBlokyz , @FugzOfficial , @goodvibesclub and @freedznft deserve to be seen for what they have built, not buried under artificial hype.
the problem is not that every new project is bad, or that every influencer is dishonest.
the problem is a market where manufactured hype can be more valuable than years of genuine work.
buyers also need to be more careful, but the greater responsibility belongs to those who use their influence to create trust while hiding their own financial interests.
the nft market needs more transparency:
- clear disclosure of financial interests.
- accountability for creators and influencers.
- more scrutiny of suspicious wallet activity.
- real consequences for market manipulation.
lower prices do not kill a market.
the loss of trust does.
if we keep rewarding this behavior, we will keep pushing real artists and communities out of the spotlight.
and eventually, there may be nothing left worth coming back to.
➖ vyre
first revenue share is a strong signal of commitment .
133 ETH in total volume and 3.8487 ETH shared with 1,798 wallets , even in a difficult NFT market .
this is what building long term value looks like. real rewards, transparency, and a team delivering on its promises .
and if you want a bigger share , check the tier list in the image below . holding more normies and PIXEL increases your multiplier and boost, giving you a higher share of future rewards .
First revenue share epoch! 🎉
112 ETH on OpenSea
21.2 ETH on Pixel Market
Total: 133 ETH volume since October 5.
As we committed and set on the blockchain, we share 50% of both revenue streams with Normies holders.
From @opensea royalties: 2.7874 ETH
From #PIXEL market fees: 1.0613 ETH
Total: 3.8487 ETH ($8,714) shared with 1,798 wallets.
Every holder got paid, and claims open tomorrow.
Revenue share is tiered by both the Normies and the #PIXEL you hold. Hold more of either to level up your multiplier and boost.
In a flat market, with hacks across the space and NFT volume at all-time lows, we still shared 3.8487 ETH with ALL of our holders.
We believe in the future of NFTs. We believe in the future of Normies. When the market comes alive again, more volume means a bigger pool and higher earnings for every holder.
Check your share: normies.art/lab/pixel-market…
one nft . multiple doors .
what makes the latest move from @0xhazels interesting is the connection between different projects .
with three campaigns live on Hazels Studio, holders can access staker multipliers across creator campaigns and exclusive opportunities through Drops .
the bigger idea is not just giving an nft more utility. it is building a place where ownership can connect people to different communities and creative work .
that is a stronger direction for nft membership .
🤝 Paid partnership
vyre retweeted
the last two months have been tough for NFTs .
low trading volume, a slow market, and most new launches dropped below mint after reveal .
@freedznft was one of the few exceptions. it recovered within 24 hours and started moving up .
beyond the price , the art and concept are what make this collection special .
i believe strong collectors will join sooner or later .
my view is long term . like many other pieces i own , one FREEDZ will stay in my collection for good .
🟥 vyre
vyre retweeted
an nft should open doors, not just take up space in a wallet .
that idea is starting to take shape at @0xhazels .
one active stake can connect ownership to creator campaign multipliers and access to exclusive drops. the nft stays in your wallet, while your participation becomes part of the record .
the interesting part is what comes next: more projects, more doors, and more ways for holders to take part .
utility is not a promise. it has to be built, tested, and used .
🤝 Paid partnership
