Gen X NYCer, former ad agency hack and analytics entrepreneur, musician, contrarian politics/culture war commentary of dubious value that nobody reads anyway
New York, NY
Joined April 2008
- Tweets5.7K
- Following4.6K
- Followers833
- Likes34.5K
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
I wrote this description/warning of what is happening in the West. Please watch it and share it with others. @idicenter
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
🚨 THREE VIDEOS FROM IRAN IN THREE DAYS, ALL ASKING THE SAME THING: TRUMP, MEET PAHLAVI.
This one just came in. Someone got up onto a rooftop, held a sheet of paper against the skyline, and said the words out loud in English.
The paper is in English too. It was not written for Iranians to read. It was written for Americans, and for one American in particular.
He could do it tomorrow. One meeting, and it is the thing this regime fears the most.
Say it with them. Repost this and put the words in your own post so it does not all come from one account.
Anyone in Iran with a pen and a phone can be the fourth. Send it to me.
#TrumpMeetPahlavi
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
🚨 ESCÁNDALO: ayer se publicó el informe de 200 folios "The Rape Gang Inquiry Report" (investigación sobre Bandas de Violación pakistaníes en Reino Unido). Las instituciones lo ocultaron todo, incluido Keir Starmer, el PM. Es horroroso. Te lo resumo.
Estima en 250.000 niñas británicas abusadas en 149 distritos del Reino Unido durante años. No son casos aislados: son redes organizadas, mayoritariamente de hombres de origen paquistaní (entre el 87% y 95% según condenas y datos).
Recoge testimonios extremadamente gráficos y perturbadores. Ejemplos: una víctima violada por 600-700 hombres en 3 años. Niñas encerradas en jaulas como perros, quemadas con cigarrillos, waterboarding, estrangulamiento, violaciones con objetos. Fallos médicos y policiales que agravaron el trauma. Racismo étnico-religioso de los abusadores.
Y lo peor no es solo el abuso... es que las instituciones lo sabían y miraron para otro lado. Policía, servicios sociales, ayuntamientos, NHS y escuelas recibían denuncias y las ignoraban, destruían pruebas o incluso arrestaban a las víctimas por "consentir".
El miedo a ser tachados de "racistas" era más fuerte que proteger a las niñas.
Aquí es donde la historia desemboca directamente en Keir Starmer. Entre 2008 y 2013, él era el Director de Fiscalías (DPP) y jefe de la Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), la agencia que decide qué casos se persiguen.
Durante su mandato se emitieron más de 13.000 Child Abduction Warning Notices (avisos blandos sin consecuencias reales) a sospechosos de estas bandas.
En lugar de procesos penales fuertes, se optó por palmaditas en la espalda. Casos clave como Rochdale empezaron con decisiones de la CPS de no perseguir, priorizando supuestamente "evitar tensiones comunitarias" sobre la justicia.
El informe lo señala claramente (junto a otros como Sadiq Khan o Andy Burnham): el Partido Laborista, en ayuntamientos y a nivel nacional, priorizó votos en las comunidades étnicas afectadas y evitó confrontar el patrón para no parecer racista o xenófobo.
Starmer ha dicho que impulsó algunas persecuciones después, pero los hechos muestran un sistema que falló sistemáticamente bajo su liderazgo. Hoy, como primer ministro, prometió una investigación nacional... pero muchos ven que llega tarde, después de años de presión y con un enfoque que algunos critican por diluir la responsabilidad.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
🚨 DIRECT FROM TEHRAN: "Arm us." The momentum is building.
This man just risked everything to show the world that the Iranian people want to be armed. They are desperate to get this message out, and after the massive response to the video of the woman I posted earlier, more people need to amplify their calls.
I asked for proof from the ground, and he answered by filming this right in the heart of Tehran. Look closely at what he is doing: he is driving down an active highway in broad daylight, holding an illegal sign punishable by death against his steering wheel, right in front of the Milad Tower. He is operating directly under the regime's nose to prove this resistance is real.
For the millions he represents, demanding weapons is no longer a political debate. It is a tactical necessity for survival. Peaceful protest against live ammunition has proven impossible. They aren't asking for foreign boots on the ground. They are asking for the basic means to defend themselves against a systemic slaughter.
He risked his life to bypass the blackouts and deliver this geographical proof. Do not let the regime bury his bravery.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
As Iranians inside Occupied Iran slowly reconnect to the internet, new footage of the anti-Islamic Regime, Pro-Pahlavi protests are emerging.
This is what the Islamic Regime and their supporters DON'T want you to see... The Truth.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Anyone who's familiar with Arab politics knows that anti-Zionism is a cognitive trap that collapses all political analysis into a single explanatory theory. Why no democracy? America protects Israel. Why poverty? The regime serves American-Israeli interests. Why corruption? The rulers are traitors working for Israel. Every domestic failure gets routed through this singularity, which means the actual causes of the failure become literally unthinkable, genuinely unavailable as categories of analysis because the entire space of political reasoning has been totally consumed. The political decisions that flow from this captured consciousness are then what actually produce the conditions of poverty and unfreedom that the theory pretends to explain.
This is, without doubt, what the rise of anti-Zionism threatens will do in Western societies and you can already see it. The American opposition that forces everything through Palestine/Israel isn't just wrong about chains of causality; it's actively generating the dysfunction it attributes to the Zionist-American conspiracy or empire or whatever. The singular theory is not merely a misdiagnosis but the very pathogen that produces the disease it claims to name.
Every population whose political cognition has been captured by the Palestine/Israel symbol ultimately and inevitably becomes an open field of exploitation because they become incapable of seeing the causes of their own immiseration, and thereby unwittingly but actively reproducing the conditions of their immiseration, often through the very act of trying to resist it.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
💡You have heard the story a million times:
“Evil America staged a coup and overthrew Iran’s democratically elected leader Mosaddegh…”
Every libertarian podcaster like Dave Smith, and “history expert” on the internet repeats it like gospel.
Well, it is a big lie.
1- “Mossadegh was not elected by the people. The Iranian Constitution of 1906 made no provision for the direct election of the head of government, he came into office because the Shah appointed him.”
2- ✨Mosaddegh was no democrat.✨
He halted 1952 parliamentary elections mid-way to block conservative rural seats, creating a parliament tailored to himself.
He then dissolved even that body via an unconstitutional public referendum (not secret ballot) with absurd results, ruled by emergency decree, neutered the Supreme Court, and seized the Defence Ministry.
He also dropped women’s suffrage to appease the clergy after promising it, the exact opposite of democratic spirit.
3- NO, the CIA did not overthrow Mossadegh. “But not because the CIA didn’t try. It’s because the attempt failed.”
The actual events of August 19 were driven by Iranian generals, grand ayatollahs, the bazaar, and street mobs, not by Kermit Roosevelt or the CIA, which had already lost control and cabled Washington to “make peace with Mossadegh.”
The whole “America destroyed Iranian democracy” tale collapses once you read actual history not propaganda.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Israel has shown itself to be a great friend on a rainy day, while Britain under Starmer has shown that you cannot depend on it at all, even in traffic-light disputes. Israel has helped the Middle East get rid of terrorists such as Khamenei and Nasrallah, who killed 500,000 Syrians, created 5.6 million refugees, and caused the deaths of millions of Iranian people. Israel, whether you like it or not, is a much better friend than many who claim to be your friends and allies, yet disappeared when the Islamic regime in Iran started sending missiles and drones at babies and schools. Israel is part of the past, present, and future of the Middle East. A true friend is not known in comfort, but in crisis. Israel stood when others vanished. It faced the Islamic regime in Iran and those who spread terror, bloodshed, and fear across the region. While many spoke loudly of loyalty, they fell silent when missiles were sent toward homes, children, and schools.
And the UAE stands firm on the side of peace, against terrorism, against hatred, and against antisemitism. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they build what violence can never destroy.
And yes, the Iranian people are not the regime. They are an ancient people with a great civilization, held hostage by darkness and denied the peace they deserve. Their suffering is written in tears, prisons, exile, and stolen futures.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Israel is not an apartheid state and never has been. Since its birth, Israel has guaranteed equal rights for all its citizens.
In fact, many Arabs prefer life under Israeli rule to life under the PA, Hamas, or other Arab regimes throughout the Middle East.
Much like 1948, Israel is currently fighting a multi-front war against countries that want to wipe it off the map. When these nations finally agree to recognize Israel's right to exist, perhaps there can be peace in the region.
Happy Israel Independence Day 🇮🇱
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Just so we’re clear: The war in Lebanon is not between Hezbollah and Israel, with Lebanon as some hapless victim caught in the crossfire.
This war exists because Lebanon has failed to prevent armed attacks against Israel launched from its own territory. Hezbollah is the aggressor. Israel is reacting in self-defense.
Lebanese citizens who genuinely want Israel to stop must first remove the reason for Israel’s actions: Hezbollah. Once Hezbollah is disarmed and disbanded, everything the Lebanese are currently demanding from Israel will happen automatically, even without Beirut having to ask.
It’s time to be honest and courageous enough to face reality instead of repeating the populist but false narrative that Hezbollah and Israel are equally enemies of Lebanon. Hezbollah is. Israel is not.
The faster the Lebanese understand this, the sooner they can rid themselves of Hezbollah and finally live in peace with Israel.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
A farmer walking home in winter finds a viper frozen stiff in the snow. Moved by pity, he picks it up, tucks it inside his coat against his chest, and warms it back to life with his own body heat. The viper thaws. The viper bites him. The farmer, dying, says: "I deserved this, for pitying a viper."
The Islamic Republic is the viper. The West is the farmer. And the regime has been frozen in the snow more times than anyone wants to admit.
1979 should have been terminal. An economy built on a single export, a revolution that purged its own competence, a war with Iraq that bled a generation. The regime should have died in its first decade. It didn't, because the farmer came along. Europe traded. America negotiated. Sanctions were lifted, then softened, then lifted again. Every time Tehran froze, someone in Washington or Brussels or Berlin decided the humane thing, the sophisticated thing, the grown-up thing was to warm it up.
The JCPOA didn't just unfreeze the regime, it handed it $100 billion and a runway. Sanctions relief under Biden refilled the coffers right before October 7. Every "humanitarian waiver," every unfrozen account, every European delegation arriving with a briefcase full of engagement: coat, chest, body heat. And every single time, the bite. Hezbollah rearmed. Hamas funded. Houthis weaponized. Americans killed. Jews hunted. Protesters hanged. Centrifuges spinning.
The farmers always act surprised. They shouldn't. The viper never lied about what it was. It's written in the constitution, chanted in the parliament, printed on the money. "Death to America" isn't rhetoric. It's a mission statement the regime has been consistent about for forty-seven years. The only inconsistency has been on our side: our endless capacity to believe that this viper, this time, warmed by our particular coat, will behave differently.
And here's the part the scorpion fable gets wrong and this one gets right: the viper doesn't die. The viper slithers off, warm and fed, to bite the next farmer. The regime isn't suicidal. It's parasitic. It has survived sanctions, isolation, assassination of its scientists, destruction of its proxies, uprisings in its streets. Not because it's strong, but because every time it starts to freeze, we panic about the cold and pull it back to our chest.
The farmer's dying line is the whole point. Not "the viper betrayed me." Not "how could this happen." He says: I deserved this, for pitying a viper.
That's the sentence that matters. The problem was never that the snake was a snake. The problem was the farmer's certainty that his warmth, his goodness, his sophistication could change what the snake fundamentally was. It couldn't. It never can. Pity for a viper isn't mercy. It's suicide dressed up as virtue.
So when the next round of negotiations begins, and it will, because there is always another farmer, the question isn't whether Tehran will bite. That's settled. That's nature. The question is whether the West has finally learned that a regime freezing in the snow is not a tragedy to be solved. It's an outcome to be finished.
Leave the viper in the snow.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Over the past 47 years, Iran Regime
has killed more Muslims than Israel
has in its 78 years of existence.😎
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
The Islamic Republic is currently navigating a terminal conflict between its two primary power sources: financial capital and ideological commitment. When the state enters a period of economic insolvency, it must rely on ideology to maintain the loyalty of its apparatus. However, ideological purity requires a level of inflexibility that prevents the economic stabilization needed to pay its supporters. This circular dependency creates a systemic vulnerability. The regime cannot negotiate for funds without appearing weak to its believers, yet it cannot sustain its believers without the funds to pay its enforcers.
🎖️ Come talk to me in our discussion group: skool.com/libertypolitics/ab…
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Israel is back in control of southern Lebanon 26 years after it left in 2000, just as Israel is back in control of the Gaza Strip 21 years after it left it in 2005. This control, military occupation, or whatever you want to call it, is the direct result of irresponsible and criminal decisions made by Hezbollah and Hamas terrorists who failed to leverage newly acquired freedom and territories in pursuit of nation-building, sustainable futures, and peace. “Resistance” was not only a slogan, but it became an industrial complex, with money, narratives, propaganda, foreign interference, and terror infrastructure.
Even if you believe in resistance, that should have stopped in Lebanon after 2000, and it should have stopped in Gaza after 2005 – the whole point of resistance is to no longer live under a direct military occupation. What kind of pathetic, ill-conceived, unintelligent, and moronic resistance invites the occupation back into one’s country decades later, causing complete and utter devastation? This is further proof that Hezbollah and Hamas, while made up of and endorsed by many in Lebanon and Palestine, were never truly organic to their respective societies and only existed as tools for foreign agendas, masters, and enablers.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Today in NYC they're chanting "globalize the intifada". On American streets, under American police protection, using American free speech, to demand American cities be turned into the target set of the Second Intifada.
The intifada wasn't abstract "resistance." It was blowing up teenagers at a disco in Tel Aviv. It was bombing a pizzeria full of kids in Jerusalem. It was murdering grandparents mid Passover Seder.
"Globalize" isn't a metaphor. It's a logistics word.
The world has already seen "globalized" up close.
Bataclan: 90 concertgoers executed during a rock show in Paris.
Manchester Arena: a suicide bomb at the exit as teenage girls walked out of an Ariana Grande concert. 22 dead, children among them.
Nice: a 19-ton truck plowing through families watching Bastille Day fireworks. 86 dead on the promenade.
Berlin Christmas market: a truck driven into parents and kids shopping for ornaments.
London Bridge: three men, knives, a van, and a Saturday night crowd out for dinner.
They're not asking you to free Palestine. They're asking for more of that.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Hamas not only stole away the humanitarian aid sent to Gazans, but also used the aid as a tool to sexually abuse the poor women (and girls) of Gaza... the same women and children that the defunct Hamas leader, Hanieyah, said he wants more of their blood to fuel Hamas' revolution!
What else do you need to know to realize how evil Hamas is?!
I will not be surprised if those who cheered for Hamas when they killed, raped, and kidnapped Israel women on October 7, 2023, will jump in now to justify Hamas' abuse of Gazan women under the war!
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
Tragic- as a British born Muslim woman educated in a tier one British Medical School 40 years ago, this is heart breaking- the capture of the WESTERN intellectual space by Islamist and far left actors is rightly challenged by the UAE 🇦🇪. We have similar problems in the United States we refuse to confront
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
For those wondering why we haven’t seen an uprising in Iran since the January 8–9 crackdown, the answer is on the streets.
The regime is staging daily shows of force. Basij units, men and women, parading through cities - looking ridiculously like Ninja Turtles - with flags of the Islamic Republic and Hezbollah, backed by 23mm and 12.7mm machine guns… the kind you normally point at fighter jets and armoured vehicles, not civilians. It’s not a rally. It’s intimidation.
The message is simple: don’t you even think about it.
And ironically, this level of theatrics screams fear, not strength. A confident regime doesn’t need anti-aircraft guns to manage its own population. Which also explains the internet blackout, because once people can see, then they can organise!
So instead, the regime may choose war over compromise. In their minds, it’s safer. If the Taliban could last 20 years, they think they can last 20 weeks.
It’s a brutal calculation, and the Iranian people are the ones paying the price.🤦🏻♂️
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
People wondering why Hezbollah supporters fired celebratory shots into the air after the ceasefire announcement—despite the heavy losses they suffered—are missing the point. This is not a show of force against Israel; it is a show of force against other Lebanese communities.
I grew up in Ain El Remmaneh, and the bullets would always fall into my neighborhood whenever Nasrallah’s supporters celebrated his speeches. The message is familiar: we are still in control.
This is their language. Once you understand Lebanese politics for what it is—a never-ending sectarian conflict—much becomes clearer about why people act the way they do.
Siddhartha Naithani retweeted
One of these women eventually fled, the other was executed.
It took only a few months before it became more apparent how great the magnitude of horror this regime would inflict. But by then it was too late.
A cautionary tale for those of us in the west who indulge, let alone dabble in such ideological delusions and believe these sorts of ideas coursing through our institutions, schools and lives are harmless.
They destroy not only lives, but nations and civilizations.
Young leftist women in 1979, holding up a picture of Ayatollah Khomeini, calling for the modern-day version of the intifada.
Here’s the difference. They won.
At the time, women in Iran had unparalleled rights, beyond anywhere else in the Middle East. They had full suffrage, could hold high office, freedom of dress, and were present in parliament, courts, ministries, and diplomacy. They were widely educated and professionally active in law, medicine, engineering, academia, and the arts. In terms of civil and legal rights, they were equal to—and in some cases ahead of—western women in the 1970’s.
Yet, it wasn’t enough. They wanted revolution. They had been seduced by the false promises. They wanted the Islamist figure who swore to free the oppressed from the oppressor and bring about heaven on earth, a utopia in Iran. We all know how this story ends. Lynchings, eye gauging, amputations, and mass graves.
Now, westerners are falling about themselves in the same giddy delirium, hungry for a glimpse of the nightmare Iranians still haven’t woken up from.
I guess that’s why they say those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.
