agree that establishing a monetary premium is the most important thing. disagree that ore's design prevents it from doing so the reserve simply preserves some of the revenue that would otherwise go to miners (in the btc/zec model) and repurposes it as buying power during downturns it doesn't have to be fancy. and done correctly it can make for a better SoV (almost by definition) re ohm, the differences are meaningfully different. for one, original ohm had no limits to supply expansion. so not a great analogy ohm does demonstrate that the reserve cant establish or sustain a monetary premium. on this we agree ore still has to establish lasting monetary demand. but i think the reserve can support this basically there is no good reason for why using revenue to dampen downside volatility (instead of funding security) should put something outside the category of money -- i think you only get to this conclusion if you anchor too hard on what has worked so far