osk (@oskdev) header
osk (@oskdev) profile picture

Indie gamedev and founder @tetriogame, an online stacker game with over eight million players. Tweets/RTs/likes do not represent brand. Do not DM for support.

The Daisy Hill on the Moon
Joined April 2022
Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)Photo by osk (@oskdev)
this whole "build the wall" thing is a great litmus test on people's integrity if you cheer on TTC taking it down, then you deserve for them to take down tetrio the same
6
2
55
2,863
throwing tetrio under the bus in order to "le epic rekt" some distasteful slop people would otherwise forget within days is selfish, naive, or both imo
20
812
brave's entire business has always been to be an alternative ad network. nothing more, nothing less. their browser's main purpose has always been to remove webmasters' own advertisements, and replace them with brave's own ads without giving said webmasters any compensation
A fresh Brave install in 2026: sponsored ad wallpapers on new tab page by default (opt out). Brave VPN, News, Talk, Leo (AI), Rewards and other revenue-milking bloat is advertised/pinned by default. Analytics and "phoning home" by default. Google as default search engine in most regions by default. Sponsored search engines like Russian Yandex in CIS countries by default: github.com/brave/brave-core/… Brave has an ad branch that handles advertising within the browser: brave.com/ads. Brave does on-device ad targeting based on cohorts and interests, just like what Chrome used to do and what Google was largely hated for (remember FLoC?). This applies to additional (opt-in) rewarded ads, shipped as part of Brave. Brave has injected referral IDs to crypto-related URLs entered into the omnibox in the past, intentionally, by design: teapawt.org/CR1337/status/12692014… github.com/brave/brave-brows… reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/… Brave also uses dark patterns to drive users away from turning off ads in their browser. For example, an article linked from the "opt out" button in the browser has a wall of text making excuses for ads before the actual steps needed to be taken to disable them: support.brave.app/hc/en-us/a… kind of hypocritical for brave to judge firefox for lesser bullshit, don't you think?
2
3
74
3,455
despite being such a webmaster, losing a ton of money every month on adblock, i think users should block ads. but replacing them with brave's own is nasty. privacywashing that as "we're saving you from those pesky invasive ads!!" is even more nasty
2
32
982
i remember when people were starting to block brave's useragent for this reason and then brave suddenly added the "privacy feature" where they made it so it doesn't have its own useragent. real smooth, guys
1
20
678
tried out this AI "vibe coding" thing for the first time by asking the computer a little question i don't get how anyone uses this
8
5
181
10,489
This is getting ridiculous My blog almost never gets spam (mostly because I block VPNs, sorry!), but recently there has been an insane uptick in spam. The reason? Indian "security researchers" asking LLMs to spam the blog to then send me Markdown emails (without pgp key).
2
2
37
1,649
People have probably heard by now about this happening to open-source projects (ie curl) but it's happening to practically all websites at this point, and it's undermining actual security by wasting people's time on these scam artists.
1
8
864
Is some AI company giving out free/cheap credits or something? The Tetris community has also suddenly seen an uptick of bottom-barrel slop all of a sudden.
1
7
808
ウィマーマ・サーガ dance but TETR.IO Full Short ↓↓↓↓ youtube.com/shorts/LxTt7apLZ… T-Mino Chan's moving again 😭😭😭
1
4
28
1,405
have we forgotten that "the os is just webpages" has been a thing since windows 98? that "classic control panel" is also just a webpage remember how XP tried to make people think you needed a ".NET Passport" to use the internet there has never been a "year of the windows desktop"
Microsoft doesn’t stop you from uninstalling Edge just to annoy you or take away your freedom. It’s because, in modern Windows, Edge is no longer just a browser but rather part of the operating system itself. A lot of Windows components now depend on Edge’s rendering engine (WebView2) to display content. Things like Settings pages, help screens, widgets, login flows, Microsoft Store content, and even some third-party apps use Edge in the background to render web-based interfaces. So if you completely remove Edge, you’re not just deleting a browser, you’re removing a shared system dependency. That can break core features or make parts of Windows unstable. Because of that, Microsoft treats it like a protected system component and restricts normal users from uninstalling it. Linux works differently because of its design philosophy. Nothing is “sacred” or protected at that level. The system assumes the user has full control and full responsibility. If you have root privileges, you can remove anything even critical parts like the bootloader, kernel, or libc. Linux won’t stop you, warn you much, or lock it down. If you delete the bootloader, the machine simply won’t boot. That’s not a bug; it’s intentional freedom.
2
31
1,798
this guy's pages are really fun to browse through: toastytech.com/guis/win98.ht… it's a time capsule of old OSes and in particular captures well how people have thought about microsoft over time and, more importantly, how none of it has really changed
13
1,094
thats my goat i love you andrew
1
7
38
5,764
Added tetrio and colonist to the database.
2
2
74
2,907
I'm Bac k
8
57
2,245
PapPal
30
1,844
testing something. Can you see this message? (C)
23
1
107
3,686