We’re renaming our Max plans:
Max 5x → Max
Max 20x → Ultra
Max is still $100/month, and Ultra is still $200. If you’re a subscriber, there’s nothing you need to do.
We’re also removing the 5-hour limit for verified Ultra accounts, starting today with most existing subscribers. Newer accounts keep a temporary limit until they’re verified, which helps us prevent fraud and abuse. You'll get an email when it's removed.
Weekly limits remain unchanged. View our plans here: claude.com/pricing
@chrislakin says it best here
teapawt.org/chrislakin/status/2103…
othy.h retweeted
The coding interview is dead, at least for my team at Anthropic. I've seen enough to know that it no longer provides signal. I removed it from loops this month.
I have a spicy, optimistic take - I think there's an opportunity for junior engineers: felixrieseberg.com/hunger-be…
othy.h retweeted
THE CEASEFIRE HAS COMMENCED
The ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia took effect at 4:00am Moscow time on October 27, 2026.
Timing was accelerated two days ahead of schedule to protect the safety of civilians and to facilitate the delivery of critical humanitarian aid. The ceasefire’s geographic area has expanded beyond Oleshky, within the Kherson Region, to provide safe passage for the humanitarian convoys.
General Valery Gerasimov, Joint Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces has confirmed.
othy.h retweeted
“The core algorithm was found on October 16 by an internal Claude research model with 14M output tokens and no human input. Anthropic researchers worked with Claude to improve the presentation, resulting in this paper.”
github.com/anthropics/formal…
RT @polynoamial: Only 2.5 years ago, AI labs would brag about their frontier LLM performance on grade school math benchmarks (GSM8K). I can…
This quoted post is unavailable.
othy.h retweeted
Navier-Stokes SNAGGED
Kakeya & restriction conjecture OBLITERATED
4D Yang-Mills existence SCOOPED
TRIPLE KILL. ULTRA KILL. MONSTER KILL
C C C C COMBO
othy.h retweeted
Whatever you believe about the world I think we can all agree that P(P = NP) is increasing....
othy.h retweeted
For those who don’t know, ETH is the hypothesis that 3SAT needs exponential time. Very surprising and consequential that it is false.
A “country of geniuses in a data center” describes productive potential, not shareholder value. The closer analogy may be a university retaining a claim on the earnings of successive graduating cohorts...
Why you shouldn’t bother reading the Anthropic IPO filing ft.trib.al/jFn80Et
othy.h retweeted
I have published a 60+ chart analysis of the Anthropic S-1. I'll show here some of my favourites.
Deployed here: ant-s1.surge.sh/
Anthropic made an operating profit of $974m in Q2 2026
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec
Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
othy.h retweeted
Terence Tao says OpenAI went into CODE RED over rumors that Anthropic was close to solve a Millennium Prize Problem, and they paused new $200 Pro signups to direct compute to solve Navier-Strokes.
OpenAI rejected both claims.
but Tao’s timing is also very off about this:
>Sep 8: OpenAI published the results
>Sep 10: OpenAI paused $200 Pro
that’s TWO days after the announcement when they already finished solving Nav Strokes
He should have done some maths to know that the 10millions $ compute claims are a delirium
Terence Tao says OpenAI went into CODE RED over rumors that Anthropic was close to solve a Millennium Prize Problem, and they paused new $200 Pro signups to direct compute to solve Navier-Strokes.
OpenAI rejected both claims.
but Tao’s timing is also very off about this:
>Sep 8: OpenAI published the results
>Sep 10: OpenAI paused $200 Pro
that’s TWO days after the announcement when they already finished solving Nav Strokes
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec
Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
othy.h retweeted
For the Navier-Stokes proof:
"On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding"
Since I'm now blocked by bluey from replying to this thread, I answer here by quote tweet
the openAI construction has more to do with convex integration than anything else.
In convex integration, the oscillations are typically built by hand and the iteration procedure creates wild weak solutions. The non-uniqueness construction of Albritton–Brué–Colombo used an unstable vortex to split solutions apart. The Córdoba–Martínez-Zoroa singularities amplify vorticity across scales by strain. In the openAI paper, a fluid instability is clever made so that the flow itself generates the oscillations: they grow by drawing energy from the background shear. The Reynolds stress then becomes the force that creates the collapsing smooth vortex. Using a physical instability to create the stress in this way has no precedent, and it is what produces a smooth force rather than a merely rough one.
Some on these ideas are in the literature (e.g. Leibovich-Stewartson 1983) but the way they are combined is definitely insane and definitely nowhere in the literature previously.
I also don't know of anyone suggesting that convex integration would play a role in the creation of a blow-up solution like this.
On a technical level, the paper is unbelievable, maybe beyond what a human could have come up with but not beyond human understanding: there are several different groups of pde experts working on understanding it who say that they more or less understand now. I expect digestions soon
td;lr: anyone saying that this OAI result is unsurprising is bullshitting
sorry!
othy.h retweeted
I don't take money from any lab. I'm saying this impartially; the number of people on my feed over the last two weeks saying they are switching over to Anth because of Opus 5.5 is like nothing I've seen before. And even if someone does beat Opus, they have Fable 5.5 ready to go.
Does SI takes on greater risk 👀
Replying to @TPurity_Alphas
Elon says:
"we will not be able to boss around AI that are smarter than us"....
while having built his fortune on bossing around thousands of engineers and scientists who are way smarter than himself
🤣🤣🤣































