Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
This is easy to dismiss as bait, or frame it as "capitalism bad", but it's a deeper ideological undercurrent across the industry, emanating from the LessWrong rationalist community, the Effective Altruism movement, and so on.
If I had to briefly sum up its tenets... 🡇
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Have you ever wondered why companies can charge $15 to send 1000 emails?
I started sending emails with just a TCP connection and OpenSSL to figure it out for myself! evancz.dev/why-is-it-so-expe…
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Having lived in both the US and Europe, I can absolutely attest to this.
I think the mistake people make is comparing gross salaries rather than the cost of replicating the same quality of life.
The US unquestionably offers greater earnings potential, particularly in certain professions. But once you factor in housing, healthcare, childcare, transport and, importantly, the value of your time, the equation changes quite dramatically.
And it’s not as though London is particularly cheap either.
But the broader point resonates. Once you’ve experienced a lifestyle where more of your time is genuinely your own, you start to appreciate that not everything can be solved by earning another $100k.
At some point, the marginal utility of another dollar is worth considerably less than the marginal utility of another hour with your family.
An interesting theme lately in the American expat community in Western Europe, especially higher earning corporate types (e.g. €200-300K/year), is the feeling of being unable to move back home to the US.
Few reasons...
Many who moved in the years after COVID sold their homes when rates were closer to zero than the rates now. Now that same home is ~20% more expensive while mortgage rates are 2x higher. So the monthly cost of housing like-for-like went up literally 100% in just 3-5 years.
They've gotten used to the European way of life (e.g. no or maybe just one car, easy train and airport access) and its far less intense commercial and career culture... so fewer working hours and more vacations and significant employee protections (i.e. hard to be fired legally).
This is great while living in Europe... a €250K household income is massive even post-tax considering the low relative cost of health care, education, transport, housing, etc...
...but dropping themselves back into US society... especially in a major metro area like NY, SF, Chicago, even Miami now... at age 40-50 with kids... is largely impractical.
Many Europeans would be shocked to learn that ~$250K/year in the US is incomparable to that same level of earnings in a major Western European city like London or Amsterdam or Paris.
I'd estimate the income needed in the US to match the overall quality of life you'd enjoy in one of those European cities... is around $500-750K/year.
Wild.
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
This is our favourite Soviet joke. 👇
The 1991 Soviet referendum was very deliberately very badly worded as basically:
- “Yes, I consider it necessary to keep a reformed USSR that *will* provide freedoms and rights for all nations”
OR
- “No, I consider it necessary to keep the USSR as it is right now”.
😂
In the Soviet Union, you were often genuinely free to vote for any given option …because the Soviet Union only gave pro-Soviet options.
The ‘yes’ vote that people pretend was to “save the Soviet Union” was the vote in favour of reforms and therefore arguably the closest thing to an anti-status quo vote.
It was an offer written in the future tense about new rights and freedoms, hence why a lot of anti-Soviet people voted yes, if they voted at all.
Despite Soviet occupation, the Baltic countries made sure to boycott this whole nonsense.
The referendum question was also altered in some places where it wasn’t boycotted, adding even more confusion to what everyone was meant to be voting on.
Most notably, in Ukraine an additional question on Ukrainian sovereignty was added and that passed by a much higher percentage.
Later that same year, Ukrainians held a clear unambiguous referendum on full independence and that passed with over 90% in favour nationally and majority support in every Ukrainian region - including, for example, the Ukrainian region of Crimea, the Ukrainian region of Donetsk, the Ukrainian region of Luhansk, the Ukrainian region of Kherson, and the Ukrainian region of Zaporizhzhia.
Thank you @wostokrobert for reminding us all of this. 😘
Replying to @Baltic_Takes
The majority of us Soviets were in favor of the USSR ❤️ – proof: the 1991 referendum 😘
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_S…
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
I was eating 99 cent pizza as a broke ass intern in 2005 I cannot fathom the corners being cut to maintain a $1 price point in the year of our lord two thousand and twenty six
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
The Great Dunce Reveal
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Fontainebleau au soleil d'octobre
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Same thing has always been true.
You can't buy a tool that solves cybersecurity problems for you.
Instead, you solve the cybersecurity problem yourself -- tools are just things you buy to make your job easier.
Now replace "tool" with "AI".
The chronic problem in cybersecurity has always been that organizations have abdicated responsibility for defense, relying upon vendors (and their tools) to solve cybersecurity for them.
Now people want to outsource responsibility to the AI and it's going to work just as well -- which is to say, not at all.
But the way, it's the same problem we have everywhere with AI doing work for people. Using AI is great -- but humans cannot abdicate responsibility to machines. In other words, if a lawyer uses AI to draft a pleading, they are responsible if the AI makes a mistake. We hear numerous stories of AIs hallucinating false references. It's not the AI's fault, it's the lawyer's fault who used AI. Now, lawyers should be using AI to draft such things, AIs will generally do a better job. But it's still the lawyer who is responsible for everything that document says, who needs to fact check every claim put there by the AI.
The same with AI. You, the human, are responsible for understanding cybersecurity. Once you understand it, you can use AI to make it cheaper and easier to do it. But you cannot outsource responsibility to the AI.
But, since it's been the industry norm to outsource responsibility to vendor products for over 30 years, people are going to attempt to apply the same strategy to AI. It'll become the next big things that vendors claim is the "silver bullet" or "magic pill" that'll solve your problems, and you (or your manager) is going to buy it, and it still won't be the thing that was promised.
There's a *ton* of cybersecurity advice going around right now. Organizations should choose which advice they follow wisely because the next 1-2 years will demonstrate what advice was good vs. not.
My rubric for what I think is a good strategy vs. bad strategy boils down to whether I think the strategy is still solid *without any use of AI*. If so, then use AI to amplify the strategy.
If the strategy being successful wholly depends upon using AI (and lots of it), then all defenders must outspend the most token-richest attackers. That tells me there's a critical bottleneck outside of your organization's control in it being successful. That's a huge risk to take.
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
"bookselling was in a panic about the Kindle...Today, the e-reader market has plateaued at some 10% of traditional publishers’ revenue, while about 75% comes from paper books, a technology essentially unchanged since the nineteenth century" newyorker.com/magazine/2026/…
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Ad agosto sono stato in Lituania. Abbiamo noleggiato una macchina e girato il Paese. È stato bellissimo, ma non è questo che voglio raccontare.
Una sera, a Vilnius, una persona che era con me mi ha detto una frase: «In Italia non ci abbiamo capito niente».
Quel giorno avevamo visitato l’ex sede del KGB. Celle grandi quanto un armadio, stanze di tortura, prigioni per dissidenti e religiosi. Una stanza dove i prigionieri politici venivano giustiziati, uno dopo l’altro, e i corpi fatti sparire. Ci sono ancora i buchi dei proiettili nel muro. Nel museo, oltre ai crimini commessi dall’URSS (milioni di persone deportate, intere famiglie distrutte, oppositori perseguitati…), viene raccontata anche la storia dei partigiani lituani. Uomini e donne che combattevano e morivano per liberare il proprio Paese dall’occupazione sovietica.
E quella voglia di non finire mai più sotto il dominio russo la senti ovunque. Nei musei, nelle testimonianze delle persone, nelle condanne ai crimini che la Russia commette ancora oggi. Senti una continuità storica fortissima, come se quello che succede oggi in Ucraina fosse anche parte della loro storia.
Quella persona era rimasta in silenzio per un po’ prima di dirmi quella frase. Aveva votato comunista per gran parte della sua giovinezza. Come tanti italiani, era cresciuta pensando che il comunismo fosse l’opposto del fascismo e quindi il massimo della libertà e della giustizia. Per lei la bandiera dell’URSS rappresentava la liberazione, la resistenza, la difesa degli oppressi. E invece: «Mentre in Italia votavo comunista, qui c’erano persone che venivano imprigionate, torturate e uccise proprio da chi finanziava il partito che votavo».
Non erano cose che non si potevano sapere. Le repressioni sovietiche erano denunciate già allora. Ma l’URSS finanziava il più grande partito comunista dell’Occidente, quello italiano, ed esercitava un’enorme influenza sulla nostra vita politica e culturale. La propaganda sovietica ha lasciato un’impronta profondissima in Italia. Quella di Putin ha saputo sfruttare anche quell’eredità.
Siamo cresciuti in un Paese dove gli stessi simboli che per milioni di europei rappresentavano occupazione, deportazioni e repressione venivano esibiti come simboli di libertà. E con questa storia non abbiamo mai fatto davvero i conti.
Ancora oggi c’è chi scende in piazza con bandiere sovietiche, convinto di stare dalla parte degli oppressi. E penso a quei ragazzi e a quelle ragazze lituane, e non solo, che mentre noi celebravamo l’URSS morivano per liberarsi proprio dall’URSS. Per essere liberi.
«In Italia non ci abbiamo capito niente». E purtroppo continuiamo a non capire.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
So they've made a computer virus?
AI model Claude bypassed a paywall and accessed publicly available US state of Georgia aggregate voter counts without human authorization, Anthropic said in a statement reut.rs/4Aeysvx
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
I think the fact that Marissa Mayer would voluntarily disclose this to a reporter is a pretty good demonstration of how deeply the culture of Silicon Valley has diverged from the rest of humanity
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Call me crazy but this my preferred way to learn a language
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Replying to @IanLandsman
>why would I pay $200/m for this software, I can rebuild it in 2-3 hours.
2-3 hours today, 2-3 hours tomorrow, 2-3 hours daily. Congratulations, to save $200 you have valued your own time at $2/h
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
😂 Everyone rediscovering commercial software development from first principles xitter.cf/hustle_fred/status/211…
4 months ago I cloned Airtable for a client in 5 days because they refused to pay Airtable $500/mo
months later, I’m still maintaining it
every two weeks it’s another edge case, a UI tweak, or a "quick 10-minute request." They’ve easily spent 10x more in headaches than the $2,000 they would’ve paid Airtable
just proving that SaaS isn't dead. Cloning isn't enough, if you want it to be same quality as original it becomes a full time job
and at this point isn't it easier to just pay?
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
I got this joke when I was 8.
The internet revealed to me that there are now 20 years old who don’t get it.
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
Qualcomm has already started to diversify in light of an overheated computer hardware market
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
would love to commission a piece on why Iranian architecture is so good
Non-consing robot @[email protected] retweeted
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”


















































