Another useless „launchpad“ wrapper
No brother you won’t replace a multi billion dollar company with your vibecoded nodejs script running on your vercel free plan
fml
I believe we're about to END @Pumpfun's reign over memecoin launches.
The anger towards Pumpfun is at an ALL-TIME HIGH, and it's not hard to understand why.
For over a year, the community has been complaining about Block 0 bundling, constant PvP and developers extracting fees from traders.
Yet we're still dealing with the exact same problems every day.
I've spent a LOT of time building an alternative that actually addresses what people have been asking for.
Today, I am introducing LAUNCH.
We're ushering in a NEW ERA of memecoin launches, with every coin deployed directly on Stonk Fun.
Here's how it works:
1. We're removing the developer's Block 0 advantage.
Every coin is deployed through LAUNCH's controlled infrastructure directly on Stonk Fun, meaning creators cannot use their own deployment wallets to bundle the initial supply.
This removes a major advantage developers have over ordinary traders, although independent snipers can still participate.
2. We're giving original narratives a chance to survive.
One narrative shouldn't have five competing coins fighting over the same liquidity within minutes.
LAUNCH restricts duplicate tickers for 60 minutes and prevents the same tweet from being used for repeated launches.
We can't stop PvP across other platforms, but we can stop encouraging it through our own launch process.
3. We're putting creator fees to work for traders.
Instead of allowing developers to withdraw creator fees, LAUNCH automatically recycles 100% of them into buybacks and burns every 3 minutes.
The more trading activity a coin generates, the more fees become available for its buyback flywheel.
This gives communities a way to compete against copycat launches using the fees their own activity generates, rather than watching those fees disappear into someone else's wallet.
And the entire launch process is completely FREE, with every coin deployed directly on Stonk Fun.
But here's where I need the community's support.
I've built the infrastructure to address the problems we've been complaining about, but changing this ecosystem requires people to actually support better alternatives.
We cannot keep demanding fairer launches while continuing to reward the same mechanics that have frustrated traders for over a year.
I want people to start choosing coins where trading fees are reinvested into the token, rather than extracted by developers.
That flywheel creates the potential for stronger launches and greater upside, although no buyback mechanism can guarantee success.
I genuinely believe we have an opportunity to end Pumpfun's dominance and change how memecoins are launched.
I've done the work to build an alternative. Now I need the community behind it.
Let's end Pumpfun's reign and usher in a NEW ERA of launches.
Web: uselaunch.fun/
How it works: uselaunch.fun/how
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Pump.fun promotes @kimchi1x as an aspirational celebrity trader via ads and partnership posts. His widely cited $40M $TRUMP profit lacks public wallet verification, while associated wallets show repeated early bundling/sniping of launches followed by sells.
bitcoinfoundation.org/news/people-in…
x.com/SpecterAnalyst…
x.com/mlmabc/status/…
x.com/ftosol/status/…
x.com/a1lon9/status/…
this will just lead to more people getting rugged by giving the majority of people in the trenches a false sense of security
nobody is bundling with wallets anymore that have a clear connection
what stops you from buying 100 wallets with random ~0.2% supply amounts?
nothing.
If @Pumpfun finds a way to limit buys on a coin to be less than 0.2% of supply for example at every minute (for the first few mins of a launch) and prevent multi wallet buys where you can see a clear connection, then the bundling issue will be fixed.
You will see people with fair amount of tokens and actually organic upward trends with whales being able to enter comfortably.
binance about to have their field day draining the $PAPER LP to zero
@papertrade_xyz
its not priced in yet what this means for $neet
imagine a neet getting paid for holding neet
insane tek
consider it from this perspective:
stonk has essentially specialized in one use case out of hundreds, and even the name itself doesn’t leave much room for where you can take the concept from here.
do you really think the space is going to stay in a stock meta for years?
no.


























