“We have powerful tools: openness, optimism and the spirit of curiosity” - Captain Jean-Luc Picard
go.nature.com/4idrT6b
The NOx emissions of XAI's COLOSSUS 2 data center in Memphis from space. The emissions are 16x higher than outlined in the permit for 41 gas turbines that provide electricity to the center. The image shows NOx before (top) and after operations began.
arxiv.org/html/2608.22153v2
It is a fascist ideology. – at Vancouver, British Columbia
A Saudi court has sentenced a Sri Lankan migrant worker to death over a Facebook comment that was deemed blasphemous, whatever that is. trib.al/41ReHEI
Alexander Rauscher retweeted
Imaging Neuroscience: The First 3 Years—Editorial
Thanks to our Editorial Board, reviewers, and authors, who trusted that this would work, and moved with us to the new journal. Its success belongs to that community.
doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.1392
I have never read anything that starts with "greetings". – at Musqueam 2, British Columbia
Today I received this intriguing short letter from a Skeptic reader worth sharing (with his permission):
Greetings from a fan whose bookcase bends with the weight of his Skeptic magazines. When it comes to disbelief, I am a true believer. With that in mind, I wanted to relay something that happened years ago. This event keeps my mind open to the paranormal, if only slightly. The whole thing can likely be explained through the laws of probability, or some other rational means. But it’s very strange, nonetheless.
It started with a dream. In this dream, I found myself in an old thrift store with sundry dust-covered antiques. Behind the counter were two action figures, the only toys in the whole place. They were Captain America and The Falcon. These toys were not the sleek, modern style. They were the older type from the 70’s, tall and shaped like Barbie Dolls.
The next morning, I found myself walking by an old bookstore that I had passed a thousand times before. On a whim, I decided to go inside. The interior didn’t look exactly like the store in my dream, but the atmosphere was the same. Dusty books that outgrew the shelves were piled on the floor. And there, behind the counter, were two toys…Captain America and The Falcon. And—just as in my dream—they were the older type from the 70’s, tall and shaped like Barbie Dolls.
As I said, this was years ago, before the Marvel Avengers movies had come out. Everyone knew Captain America, of course. But the only people who knew the Falcon were comic book nerds (and other people who are afraid to talk to girls). So, it’s not as though my dream was about common items that would likely be found in any such environment. Furthermore, these were the only action figures in the store. Everything else was books and posters.
I told this to people on a recent camping trip. These people are essentially anti-skeptics (good luck finding a monster they don’t believe in). When I told them that my dream could be explained through rational means, they gave me the same look I gave them when I heard their theories on Bigfoot jumping between dimensions. It truly felt as if my attempt at rational thought was as flimsy as their belief in the paranormal.
Perhaps being a skeptic means that I must perpetually keep an open mind. And I should not fully dismiss even the craziest of ideas. One thought, however, remains. If I have truly been imbued with the power to see the future in my dreams, I’d rather see something more significant than a couple of toys left over from the 1970’s.
Sincerely, Timothy Seaver
Alexander Rauscher retweeted
This story is not exactly accurate. I was a grad student in the Miesenboeck lab when optogenetics was invented there. Here's what happened behind the scenes. I rotated there in 2001, and Gero said, "Don't tell anyone, but we're stimulating neurons with light." I thought WTF?!? 1/
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Where I work, this question is illegal. – at Colle Santa Lucia, Veneto
Replying to @Simon_Ingari
✅"I respect the company's commitment to diversity and inclusion. My religious beliefs are personal, but I'm happy to discuss my ability to meet the role's requirements, working hours, and professional expectations.
Is there a particular job-related requirement you'd like me to clarify?"
This response is professional because it does three things simultaneously: protects your privacy, reassures HR about your ability to perform the job, and redirects the conversation toward your qualifications.
1. Why those three answers can be problematic
The problem is not that Christianity, Islam, or Hinduism is something to conceal. The concern is disclosing sensitive personal information before understanding why an employer wants it.
Answer
❌"I'm a Christian."
May expose you to assumptions about your beliefs, practices, or availability.
❌ "I'm a Muslim."
May lead to assumptions about prayer times, fasting, or scheduling requirements.
❌ "I'm Hindu."
May lead to assumptions about religious observances, holidays, or cultural practices.
None of these answers is inherently wrong. However, your religion generally does not establish whether you can perform a job successfully.
Your qualifications should speak for you before your religious identity does.
2. What to say if HR insists
The key is to avoid sounding defensive while maintaining a clear professional boundary.
The common causal relationship is that in urban areas there are both more migrants and fewer far right people. – at Vancouver, British Columbia
I think this pronunciation story might be made up but, at the same time, it would be exactly my sense of humour to say "It's pronounced Mariah Carey". – at Vancouver, British Columbia
I am never leaving this app. @MariahCarey (I try to quote both Mariah Cary & Dr Curie fairly regularly-and sometimes in the same lecture.)
The most brutal part of poverty is how much of your life it consumes. Waiting for buses. Sitting in laundromats. Hunting for the cheapest groceries. Taking extra trips just to save a few dollars. Filling out endless forms. Being poor is a second job nobody pays you for.
Is the book not selling or why does he take every opportunity, even tragedy, to point us to it?
I read it and I liked it. – at Vancouver, British Columbia
The Jason Arday scandal/fiasco/tragedy is a prime example of "pluralistic ignorance." No sapient being could believe his ziggurat of whoppers, but each may have privately thought that everyone else believed them. This happens when the expression of an idea is stigmatized or punished, as obviously happened here: anyone expressing common-sense incredulity was tarred as a racist, ableist, and abettor of suicide (not to mention threatened by a barracuda law firm and questioned by the police). For more on pluralistic ignorance and other extraordinary popular delusions, see When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows...: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life (preorder paperback here; out in a few weeks). amazon.com/When-Everyone-Kno… nytimes.com/2026/08/15/world…
Alexander Rauscher retweeted
Today we're also opening the weights for Muse Glimmer, a great 30B parameter dense model that can run locally. Soon we'll also release the weights for Muse Spark 1.2, our latest foundation model. Meta is a strong supporter of open source and I'm proud of these releases. Congrats to @alexandr_wang and the MSL team for all your great work on these models.























