dr saleem⚕️

LoP Shri @RahulGandhi and @INCIndia continue to shamelessly exploit students as political tools to manufacture disruption during the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Shri @RahulGandhi and @INCIndia chose to stage a dharna outside the Hon'ble Prime Minister's residence , causing inconvenience to the public and disregarding established security protocols. Even after Government conveyed its readiness for a comprehensive discussion, the Congress chose political spectacle over democratic debate. Their objective was never solutions for students, it was disruption for political headlines For Rahul Gandhi, this is not about students. This is about manufacturing confrontation after every genuine avenue for discussion has been opened. Our Government remains 100% committed to discussing NEET and addressing every genuine concern of our youth on the floor of the House. The students of India deserve far better than being treated as props in a political campaign. They deserve certainty over chaos, solutions over slogans and responsibility over disruption. We owe our students more than outrage. We owe them answers, reforms and accountability. That is exactly what our government remains committed to delivering.

"It's Natural For Trees To Fall": Maharashtra Minister After 11-Year-Old Crushed To Death ndtv.com/india-news/its-natu…

A Government awarded (Padmasri) herbalist quack is "challenging me" because I exposed her "herbal cures" scam. Here is her video link (also below): instagram.com/reel/DaBFDH7xx… and here is mine exposing her: instagram.com/p/DZjZ4eGAe3V/ I am ready to sit at a table right across her on National TV for a LIVE debate (not online, but in person) and expose her quackery. If any media wants to do it, they can and I will comply and travel to any city. But it will be just me and her. No moderator. Just the broadcast and camera crew and the public watching us LIVE.

For the kind attention of the public please! All through the night, I performed a post publication peer review of this IIT Roorke paper that claimed that it identified chemical components in cow urine that could highly efectively kill Chikungunya virus in lab conditions. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs… There are serious concerns in the paper that mandate post publication Editorial Review from the Journal and Publication Integrity Office, and need for validation of findings... that could mandate a retraction as per COPE Guidelines. A document with all concerns explained has been emailed to: 🟡Professor (Dr) Thomas F. Hofmann Editor-in-Chief ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 🟡Copy to: Publication Integrity Office ACS Publications, American Chemical Society 🟡Copy to: Professor (Dr) Laura McConnell Deputy Editor, ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 🟡Copy to:William King, The Managing Editor American Chemical Society A lay summary of major concerns are provided below: 🔴Possible areas of data fabrication, manipulation, and internal contradictions in the study claiming antiviral activity of cow urine distillate (CUD). 🔴Identical efficacy values reported for different experimental conditions, suggesting possible data duplication or carryover. 🔴Methodological flaws, including testing at cytotoxic concentrations, invalidating antiviral claims. 🔴Manipulation of synergy thresholds, using non-standard cut-offs to falsely claim synergism. 🔴Inconsistent and contradictory GC–MS datasets, with discrepancies in metabolite identification and absent compounds. 🔴Identification of synthetic pharmaceuticals, such as medroxyprogesterone, as natural metabolites, indicating contamination or misreporting. 🔴Implausible detection of prostaglandin A1, which is unstable and unlikely to survive high-temperature distillation. 🔴Lack of direct evidence linking identified metabolites to antiviral effects, with concentrations in CUD unverified. 🔴Cytotoxicity confounding viral inhibition results, with host cell death possibly causing false positives. 🔴Weak in silico and biochemical data, with docking scores and enzyme inhibition results unreliable. 🔴Structural inaccuracies in molecular docking, such as improbable hydrogen bonds. 🔴Statistical and analytical misrepresentations, including inappropriate synergy thresholds and wide variability without proper significance testing. 🔴Undeclared conflicts of interest, as funding sources and author affiliations favor traditional and cow-derived products. 🔴Numerous inconsistencies across figures and tables, including contradictory retention times and unlabelled peaks, undermining data credibility. Requesting for action from the Journal @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @ACSReactions ➡️Initiate an editorial review under ACS and COPE guidelines. ➡️Obtain raw data: plaque counts, cell viability, GC–MS spectra, and metabolite quantification.Verify compound identifications and concentrations with independent analysis. ➡️Reassess the validity of the claimed antiviral mechanism based on verified data. ➡️Reevaluate synergy analyses using standard criteria. ➡️Consider issuing an Expression of Concern pending investigation. ➡️If unresolved, proceed with retraction to protect scientific integrity and public health.