Rivers (@riversposting) header
Rivers (@riversposting) profile picture

For the purposes of this bio, assume I have been in all the right places at all the right times.

Nyc
Joined March 2020
lexical arbitrages, idiom yield curves, semantic pegs, meaning slippage rates, linguistic volatility spreads, connotation carry trades, cross-dialect swap lines, options on translations, fluency margin calls, mimetic call options, semantic dark pools
ideological forex. translate the same proposals into progressive, conservative, libertarian and religious language. watch its approval rating change. how much of politics is an exchange-rate problem.
1
6
3
29
1,831
the path of least resistance to fix the coming crisis is to allow pre-retirement americans to accept a social security buyout in exchange for a lump sum deposited into their trump accounts (530As) with which they can buy spcx/oai/ant/etc at some discount. very simple
37
30
12
830
41,972
I love Job for many reasons, but mainly because it does a very clever jujitsu move on you as a reader. You start out thinking you've seen behind the curtain -- the scene in heaven w/ God & Satan making bets about Job. So then after Job's trials, as his four friends come visit him to give their theories of why Job is in the predicament he's in, you've got your own little theory based on the opening scene, right? You're essentially the fifth friend who has their own read of the situation. Then God comes in at the end and is like, "all your theories are wrong. None of you were there at The Beginning, and none of you know enough of the real backstory to really understand what's happening here. None of you can actually tame the chaos monster and organize all the things into a coherent whole. Only I can do that." You, the reader, think God is calling out Job and maybe his four friends. But He's calling you out, too. You, the reader, are in the same boat as Job and his four friends. You think you have enough info about what is going on with Job because you saw the opening scene in heaven, but actually you're just as clueless and limited as the story's characters. So the opener of the story is actually a trap, and the conclusion springs it on you. You think you have the backstory via some special perspective, but you're just like all the other confused people in the story. You don't really know and you're not ever going to know, either. Job's lesson is that not only does God not owe you a theodicy (so stop expecting one), but even if you could see into the unseen realm you still wouldn't have a clue. You're never going to have enough information to put the whole, chaotic picture together in some satisfactory way. It's never going to all hang together in a coherent way that makes sense. In some ways, I think Job is a coming of age story. This is one of things you learn in midlife -- that the pieces actually didn't ever fit together like you once thought they did, and the fact that it used to make coherent sense to you says more about who you were in that phase of life than it does about any larger meaning behind the events themselves. The Job story is literally yelling at you that you cannot organize the chaos of life events into a coherent "why" -- it's simply beyond you. That you once thought you could was the arrogance of youth. God is actually the only one strong enough to tame the chaos monster & split its carcass into a neat, ordered, coherent structure. This isn't the answer anyone wants, but it's the only answer that's telling you like it is. Anyway, Job is a great book. The haters are wrong. I like it because I don't like to be lied to.
was invited to a signal gc called Jobchat but contrary to what you might expect it turned out to be a Book of Job reading group
96
302
56
3,104
122,110
There is no “economy.” There is only the debt to the center that begins at the origin of the human and propels the entire history of humanity, from the earliest animal sacrifices to the latest quantitative easing of the Fed. All of human social life can be articulated as the recording, enforcement and payment of debts to the center.
1
1
1
32
998
positively straussian
For AI risk, if the prior period was "November-February 2020" in COVID terms, we're now in March 2020, where high status people are starting to express worry. Soon a preference cascade where being concerned about AI risk stops looking odd. Gates is a good barometer of this.
8
5
104
28,057
Rivers retweeted
Kind of place that hates to see an Anthropic employee coming
1
1
18
1,131
A memorable quote from Bert Cooper
37
1,352
192
16,951
Rivers retweeted
Replying to @LapsusLima
2
3