
Nerd/Geek @Wolves @WarwickshireCCC @McLarenF1
Joined November 2012
- Tweets17.6K
- Following910
- Followers493
- Likes25.6K
Rob Cross retweeted
A landmark @TheRestHistory bonus episode today.
One of the most important moments in all European history, kicking off a bonus miniseries about Hungarian football in the 1950s.
Today: WOLVES CONQUER THE WORLD AND INVENT EUROPE.
Rob Cross retweeted
Sounds like a Black Country Payday Loan Company
Throwback to the presser when they appointed the Portuguese Zenga.
"We wanted clear identity, strong leadership qualities and a real hunger to succeed. Cesar demonstrated all of those characteristics, but what impressed me most was his mentality"
😂
wolves.co.uk/news/mens-first…
Rob Cross retweeted
Replying to @reformparty_uk
A proud father on his daughter's wedding day... Oh. Oh no.
Rob Cross retweeted
Most people in France can't afford housing.
They didn't blame immigrants, or transgender people, or video games, or avocado toast.
They blame the government. Because that's who's responsible. That's always who's responsible.
I'm sure I remember another Wolves manager making a crazy amount of changes for a league game and getting sacked the following week .
Am I imagining that ? Was it Zenga ?
6️⃣ Six changes from midweek
© Toti back and captains the side
🏴 Neave leads the line
How we line-up to face @BurnleyOfficial 📋
Couldn't make this stuff up
🚨Breaking: Adam Armstrong ruled out of tomorrow's trip to Burnley with a back problem, as Wolves' injury nightmare worsens.
Story also includes Cesar Peixoto's thoughts on Raul Jimenez's injury setback, and whether Wolves' other injured players are fit to play. #wwfc
insidewolves.com/p/second-se…
Rob Cross retweeted
Straight back at it with BURNLEY vs WOLVES tomorrow night in the Championship. How do you see it going?
#BurnleyFC #WWFC #EFLChampionship
36%Burnley win
46%Wolves win
18%Draw
50 votes • Final results Rob Cross retweeted
Southampton literally started with -4 points and have already leapfrogged us 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 #wwfc
Wheres all the people who said the transfer window was a good one.
An update on Raul Jimenez's injury status.
wolves.co.uk/news/mens-first…
Rob Cross retweeted
Couldn't give a fuck what anyone thinks of Edwards, we have sacked a man that was promoted with Luton and started well with Boro last year for another Walter Zenga from the Mendes bargain bucket. Fuck off Guo.
Rob Cross retweeted
I remember you graciously coming into talksport and doing a Monday night show with Mark Saggers and I. You were candid, friendly and a very good guest.
I asked you about diving and cheating, something that if players in England did pre 2000, your own dressing room would scold you. So you didn't do it, it wasn't "English sportsmanship".
You replied. "In Spain, young players, coaches and managers don't see it as cheating, they see it as pushing the boundaries ", said with a smile!
I didn't get it then and I don't get it now. Diving and cheating are a cancer on the sport and the sport is worse for it, and yes plenty of English players do it, I know.
It's like corners. We used to put the ball in the hole, solidly within the lines, as the laws meant. Now the ball is almost placed at the near post such is the ridiculous rule bending.
As players, it's hard enough to compete in this sport ( and I know your experience with Biggleswade would confirm that) without knowing rules are being broken to the point where we can't compete anymore. That's what City are guilty of Guillem, industrial scale financial doping that made it impossible for competition to thrive. Look no more at 4 in a row to prove that.
In Europe, financial cheating in sport and in life is the norm. I've travelled extensively in Spain, Greece and Italy and those 3 places you could buy a house tomorrow and the seller will ask " how much cash will you pay so I can lower the official price". This simply can't happen in England because despite not being perfect, there are some rules that guarantee a punishment. Financial doping in football is one.
I speak for myself but foreign investment and players since 1992 has added the cherry on the top of a 120 year old cake that mostly was incorruptable, mostly.
But with that influx we've seen on and off the pitch things that long standing watchers never thought they would. City's financial doping is a last straw for many because we've grown up being used to, in theory at least, a competitive arena for all. 4 divisions of it unsurpassed anywhere.
I know you're not justifying City's verdict, merely asking a question, but you also must expect that different countries have different standards. The standards in England are now tainted, because habits and cultural norms elsewhere have tainted an almost unimpeachable sport in this country.
It's one thing to play devil's advocate and another to advocate pushing those boundaries into something that fundementally changes the sport.
For the worse.
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think.
In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards.
Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted.
City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it.
From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system.
From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.”
If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor.
We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?”
And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed.
premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
Rob Cross retweeted
🚨 The Norwegian Football Association submitted two parallel filings to FIFA on October 5 2026 concerning three matters: the FIFA Peace Prize, Flo Balogun’s suspended red card, and the FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) project.
The NFF say the filings “activate two separate FIFA mechanisms: one addressing individual conduct and
the other institutional governance and process.”
The first filing is a complaint to the FIFA Ethics Committee. It asks the Ethics Committee to “examine the conduct of FIFA President Gianni Infantino and any other individuals identified through the investigation for potential breaches of FIFA’s Code of Ethics.”
The second filing is a referral to FIFA’s Governance, Audit and Compliance Committee (GACC). It asks “whether FIFA’s governance, financial oversight, internal controls and decision-making processes has worked as intended.”
The NFF adds: “There is a recurring theme: whether FIFA office, authority or influence was used improperly.”
NFF asks for an independent and expedited process in light of the forthcoming FIFA presidential election this March.























