这个stable肯定是有救的，把合约地址设置成通过kyc状态里面的资金就能被项目方转移到treasuryAddress了，纯粹看垃圾项目方帮不帮忙了
問：存 @stable 接收人填成合約了還有救嗎？
答：100% 沒救！
原因如下
1. recoverERC20 可以把不小心打進合約的 ERC20 轉出來，但只有項目方可以調用
2. 即使項目方想幫你， 但 pre-iUSDT 是不能轉移的，這是寫死在 _update() 裡的
3. 這是不可升級的合約
雖然很痛心，但身為有些資歷的智能合約開發者，必須出來跟大家說明清楚，以免有心人士利用，對受害者造成二次傷害！
roffett retweeted
分享一个比较全的 Solana DEX idl，包含20+ DEX（pumpfun、meteora、solfi等），构建bot会用得上。
Solana生态没有EVM那么开源，有些idl很难找，甚至要自己写。
github.com/bitquery/solana-i…
etherscan.io/tx/0x1127415f0a…
The Whales team has contacted me, and I have refunded funds acquired through the vulnerability. They are now deploying a new smart contract to fix this issue.
To ensure security, please refer to their official channels for updates before trading.
@WhalesMarket
1) "Dynamic Position" is a new feature on the Whales platform. For specific details, please refer to the official documentation.
docs.whales.market/pre-marke…
3) The Whales frontend restricts the listing price of resell orders to no more than 2x the collateral, but the smart contract itself does not enforce this limit.
By directly parsing the smart contract's calldata, you can construct a resell order with an artificially high price (but still below market price). Anyone who doesn’t fully understand how Dynamic Position (DP) orders work could easily fall into this trap.
4)
My exploit tx:
app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx…
app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx…
victim:
etherscan.io/tx/0x3de679db0a…
I have discovered and successfully exploited a critical vulnerability in Whales platform's dynamic position order function.
🔴🔴🔴🔴STOP BUYING ANY DP ORDERS NOW 🔴🔴🔴🔴
@WhalesMarket @BlockSecTeam @realScamSniffer @SlowMist_Team @BlockBeatsAsia @WuBlockchain
@evilcos @shoucccc
I will explain the process in the following thread.
roffett retweeted
4.7亿美金，不是冰冷的数字，背后是无数已经受过一次伤害的家庭。二次伤害正在发生，我们不能再沉默。
$470 million is not just a cold number — behind it are countless families already hurt once. A second wound is unfolding. We can’t stay silent.
#FTX #FTXCreditor #CryptoBankruptcy #JusticeForCreditors #StopTheMotion
#FTXChina #BankruptcyJustice #USTrustee
roffett retweeted
感谢 @BlockBeatsAsia 对FTX中国债权人问题的专业采访与深入报道。
我呼吁大家关注这个话题
正义不应因国籍而被限制
当FTX中国债权人被歧视，该如何要回3.8亿？ - BlockBeats m.theblockbeats.info/news/58…
roffett retweeted
since i've seen a lot of bad takes regarding L2s and their censorship resistance, here's how i bypassed @soneium's sequencer and bought a banned token with a forced tx through L1 🧵
.@soneium rugged users >$100k in ETH on launch day
I've never seen anything like it
Want to be a permissioned chain? fine. Instead of whitelisting developers, they chose to instead freeze contracts (effectively rugging users)
Amazing launch!
roffett retweeted
Hardcoded lies, collapsing pegs, and a founder possibly playing both sides. @usualmoney USD0++ implosion: a masterclass in DeFi deception. When 60% yields turn into 87-cent redemptions, you're not the user - you're the product.
Rekt Investigates
rekt.news/unusual-money/
roffett retweeted
Study @usualmoney grift.
On official discord for weeks:
"in the worst case the model should ensure its present value remains at 1:1 and if this isn't the case, Usual DAO can unlock the bond and perform arbitrage"
Yesterday from Usual team:
"USD0++ isn't a stablecoin", "it will not be pegged", "should have read the whitepaper".
@AdliTB: Legal proceedings may be a foregone conclusion at this point, but it would be better for you and the protocol and the next few years of your lives if you allowed people to exit with their perceived notion of what they were getting into. Even if it results in Usual losing 1/2 it's TVL, that's still the best outcome for everyone. Please do not overindex on your lawyers advice because from my own point of view they've already advised you poorly.
Indeed, Usual is purely a scam. They are selling USD0++ at $1.00, but now buying it back at $0.87, and telling you that you can only redeem it back to $1.00 after 4 years. So where did my US Treasury bond interest go?
Moreover, the spread (transaction costs) for trading US Treasury bonds is not nearly this large.
So @usualmoney team has been claiming for a few weeks that USD0++ was redeemable for 1:1 USD0 so everything was chill.
Today, they stopped the 1:1 redeem function without any prior announcement to trap farmers and keep their TVL.
USD0++ is now trading at $0.92. Please send this french ponzi to zero without mercy.
roffett retweeted
1/ So, I think the surge in Base reverts is entirely driven by sniper bots. And the problem is being made much much worse by a peculiar approach Clanker takes towards seeding liquidity.
A simple change in their deployment approach would fix the problem immediately.
1) Puffer Finance initially promised a withdrawal period of 14-21 days (with the front-end process being faked, no onchain query), but later the front-end was changed to a withdrawal period of 21+ days. Now, the longest wait time for some users has reached 25-26 days, and they still cannot withdraw from Puffer Finance.
@puffer_finance @benmo @bitfish @AmirOnchain @WuBlockchain @jason_chen998 @alertdogio
4) KOLs always write lengthy articles praising how great Puffer's technology is. We need to stay away from those KOLs, as they don't actually participate in these projects and are just making money from promotions. Puffer Finance can't even manage a proper front-end for an LRT project, so I don't believe they can handle such a large amount of ETH. If your money is still with Puffer Finance, I suggest you pay attention to the depeg caused by potential liquidity shortages and withdraw from the project.
Please stay safu during bull market~