More fraud from Democrats. I’m not even surprised.
An 88-year-old widow lives in a trailer with no computer. Federal records say she gave nearly $150,000 to Democrats in almost 15,000 donations: eight a day, every day, for five years. Her answer? “Hell no.” One reporter knocked on her door with the paperwork, and her reaction says everything. But somewhere out there, those donations carry her name, and she says she never saw a dime of it. So whose hands made them? Nobody has a straight answer, and this clip is only the first thread. Watch to the end, then tell me I’m wrong.
WATCH FULL EPISODE BELOW!!!
youtube.com/watch?v=X8ZRMjb2…
A local teacher was complaining how “schools need more money” because many high school freshmen seem to be on a fifth grade level with reading and writing.
Bro, then WHY DID YOU PASS THEM?
If their mastery of their primary freaking language stopped at 5th grade, how TF did they pass 6th, 7th, and 8th grade?
Really getting tired of teachers blaming the kids for THEIR failure as an educator.
Ron Rule retweeted
Act Blue New Hampshire has received over 2 million dollars many from out of state donors. Some donors gave $30,000 as individuals. Please do not let New Hampshire become a democrat blue state. This election is very important. Grab 10 friends vote Republican November 3rd, and vote for the tax caps. Don't Mass Up New Hampshire only you can save New Hampshire. Vote responsibly and bring a friend. Let's keep the New Hampshire Advantage.
Democrats and Gun Grabbers (which is redundant) keep saying “we need more gun laws” every time there’s a shooting.
I ask them the same question every time: “What gun law do you think the shooter would have followed?”
They never answer. Maybe my replies aren’t working?
Democrats keep posting about how “the State” of New Hampshire spends less per student than other states.
This is deliberately misleading because they’re comparing a state with no income tax or sales tax to states that typically have both. We use a completely different funding model where our school funding comes primarily from local property taxes.
We can debate whether or not this is a better or worse model, but it’s completely disingenuous to ignore the fact that the majority of the funding doesn’t come from the state coffers and present a message that NH schools are somehow under-funded. When you factor that in, we are spending the same or more per student than most other states.
You may also have noticed that they never actually say the state should kick in more “INSTEAD OF” it all being on local property tax — they just say the state should pay more.
Which means they aren’t talking about a SHIFT in funding source. They’re talking about ADDING one. They don’t actually want to reduce your property taxes. Their plan would mean your property taxes stay high AND the state raises or creates a new tax to send more money to schools.
They pretend they don’t want an income tax, but when the opportunity to enshrine it into the constitution and permanently ban one was on the House floor earlier this year, all but four Democrats voted against it.
They’re telling you exactly what they want if you can read between the lines…
Schools have plenty of money. They don’t need “more state funding.” Especially while student populations are in decline. They need to SPEND LESS of the funding they already receive. In our SAU, 83% of the school funding goes to salaries and benefits. There are too many people on the payroll.







