high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
What was even the fucking point of buffing all of the racials if you're just going to puss out at the last possible second because some fucking streamers complained about an unofficial tournament.
I genuinely hate modern blizzard so much. Old Blizzard would have told Sodapoppin to fucking QQ more.
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
*paws at you* nigger
*paws at you* nigger
*paws at you* nigger
*paws at you* nigger
*paws at you* nigger
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
Imagine illegally immigrating to the United States, spending over 30 years here, and not once making any attempt to learn English, because everyone else caters to you
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
In software engineering, we have a saying: fail fast, fail often.
This is the digital equivalent of gun control.
We should be rooting out these vulnerabilities as quickly as possible, not artificially delaying their discovery.
Frontier labs around the world aren't all going to voluntarily discriminate against certain use cases. You're just concentrating power in the hands of those who don't impose these restrictions.
Every vulnerability that remains undiscovered is a vulnerability that can be exploited by someone who doesn't share your ethics.
The sooner we expose these vulnerabilities, the sooner we can fix them.
I am okay with Kimi 3.1 deliberately leaving out top-end offensive cyber capabilities from their training data.
Discriminating against use cases is MUCH less bad than discriminating against users. And the world does need all the time it can get to prepare, harden, check old code, (properly) formally verify new code, etc before the full weight of very powerful cyber attacks is upon us.
And if this first big wave of AI risk is not handled well, then we may well get a dystopia of highly locked down models, KYC gating on everything, highly intrusive surveillance on everything, a society where you may be a second or third or fourth-class citizen in terms of model access based on your credentials and nationality.
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
This is why people need to stay in their own lane.
"It's down a lot, so it'll go up a lot, right?"
Literally Tmek-ian Litecoin logic.
Who remembers when he said "Litecoin is going to do what Zcash did"
Lmao
Google is down bad for no apparent reason
So today I have been loading up on $GOOG stock (well $GOOGL but they're mostly the same) for in my eyes very cheap
I just Facetime'd with my dad and we talked about ChatGPT and he answered "yes I cancelled my ChatGPT because it's on Google now"
I asked what the jackfriks he meant
He said "so Google Search has AI now and I trust it more because it links back to sources etc"
My survival thesis is we have to be co-owner of BigTech and BigAI while they become to sole owners of exponential intelligence which will replace a lot of our businesses and which they will then sell back to us
I'm doing what I'm saying
in about a week we will drop into the right shoulder.
72-74k.
after that we will spend two months or so ranging and filling it out.
in january bitcoin will pump 50ish % to 100k to get people bullish again.
it will then range for 6-9 months between 88-100 before breaking out.
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
As someone who used to be against @beaniemaxi and after gettin to know him, seeing he’s not actually THAT BAD, the man knows the markets, he’s BEEN here before all this existed. He knows what he’s talking about.
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
People bitching about buying Bitcoin at $100K love to say that the only people preaching “never sell” bought at $100. What you idiots don’t understand is that buying Bitcoin at $100 felt just as expensive and uncertain as buying it at $100K today. You wouldn’t have bought it at $100 either. You’d have been bitching about the price then, just like you’re bitching now. 🚀
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
“Why don’t you do me a favor, pick that cotton right there.”
“I don’t have a nіgger.”
“Exactly supply and demand.”
high warlord rootslashbin retweeted
Estimates of India's average IQ (from meta-analyses of test samples, mostly Raven's vs British norms) range ~76-82. White/European averages are set at 100.
Assuming normal distributions and SD of 15, the share of Indians at or above 100 is roughly 5-12%, depending on the mean used. No fully representative national sample exists; online self-selected scores run higher (~98). Large within-India variation applies by region, education, and nutrition.
