Views are my own.

Joined February 2015
“Turns out the most advanced medical instrument Google ever shipped is a conversation that doesn't get interrupted.” The real focus we need though is to reach the 3Ps of Care (precision, personalisation, prevention) and ALL the technology to make it happen already exists…
Your doctor cuts you off about 11 seconds after you start talking. Researchers literally timed it in a 2018 study. That number is why Google's new Lancet result is bigger than it looks. In the study, 98 real urgent care patients texted with Google's AI days before their appointment. No scans, no exam, no bloodwork, just an unhurried conversation about what was wrong. That alone put the correct final diagnosis on the AI's list 90% of the time. Sounds like magic until you learn what medicine has known for 50 years. Back in 1975, a British team published a study in the BMJ tracking which part of a visit actually produced the right diagnosis. The physical exam? The labs? Nope. In 82% of cases, the patient's story alone got the doctor there. Everything else mostly confirmed what listening had already found. So the playbook for accurate diagnosis has existed since 1975. Let the patient talk. Medicine just built a system where nobody has time to run it, and an 18-minute appointment with 11 seconds of uninterrupted patient talk was the result. Google didn't build a superhuman doctor. It built the first clinician in 50 years with enough time to use the method we already proved works. And my favorite detail buried in the study... physicians who read the AI's pre-visit summary said it changed how they treated the patient in over half of cases. Hand a doctor the full story before you walk in the room and you get different medicine. Turns out the most advanced medical instrument Google ever shipped is a conversation that doesn't get interrupted.
2
111
Roxana TEODOR retweeted
Great to see this moving along. Matt Loose has been a long term user-developer of Nanopore innovation. Back in 2012-2013 the idea of Adaptive Sampling (then called ‘Read Until’) occurred to me probably on the long commute between Cambridge and Oxford. I pulled the MinKNOW software tech leaders into my office, all 2 of them, and told them to drop everything and work on this, I was excited. We also provided an API for developers, the only way we could productize a feature like that, and it was exploited from day1 by Matt. Ewan Birney subsequently coined the name ‘Adaptive Sampling’. Now, many years later Matt and colleagues from the NHS have an in situ ultra rapid cancer test/monitor that may improve outcomes. These things can take a long time and a lot of people. Never give up.
5
7
1
36
4,250
Indeed, VERY GOOOOD for humanity!!! Except for “Musk-haters 😅🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ I actually take pleasure in playing clips with HOW any of the things he built ARE actually improving human lives. Optimuld performing surgeries (at scale!!!!!) is just like a cherry on a cake
Elon Musk was asked when a robot will outperform the best surgeon on Earth, and the number he gave is shorter than the time it takes to train one. Musk: “Three years. And by the way, that’s three years at scale.” One machine in one hospital shortens a waiting list. A fleet of them changes who survives their own geography. Musk: “There will probably be more Optimus robots that are great surgeons than there are all surgeons on Earth.” Surgical skill has lived inside individual bodies for the entire history of medicine. Fifteen years to build, a few decades at peak, and it dies with the person carrying it. Every technique ever mastered had to be passed to the next person by hand, one at a time, with something lost in every transfer. A machine that reaches that level gets copied. Skill becomes a file, and the number of people treated stops depending on how many humans finished training. Diamandis: “The cost of that is the CapEx and electricity, and it works in Zimbabwe. The best surgeon is in the villages throughout Africa, or any place on the planet.” Billions of people have no reliable access to surgery of any kind. They die from appendicitis, obstructed labour and hernias, in places where the nearest operating theatre is a day of travel and a five-year wait. Medicine solved those conditions a century ago and left them unsolved for most of the planet. The cure had to be carried by a person, and that person was always somewhere else. Musk: “Not absolutely certain, but I’d say if you say four years, absolutely.” He has moved dates before and built the thing anyway. The extra year is regulation. Approval moves slower than the hardware, and the delay lands entirely on the people waiting. Diamandis: “If it’s four or five years, who cares. That’s still an incredible statement to make.” None of that changes what happens when it lands. Rural hospitals stop closing, and the specialist your town could never recruit is there at three in the morning. A cataract operation takes twenty minutes and gives a person their sight back. It becomes something you receive instead of something you go blind waiting for. Musk: “Here’s the thing to understand about human robots in terms of the rate of improvement.” Human ability restarts at zero every generation, and forty years of judgment disappears at retirement. Machine ability accumulates permanently and transfers instantly, so every improvement anywhere arrives everywhere at once. Each of these machines carries a surgeon’s judgment inside it. The people who train them will treat more patients through them than they could reach across a thousand careers. Medicine has spent its entire existence rationing genius by proximity. The best doctor who ever lived reached a rounding error of the people who needed one, and every doctor before him did the same. It takes fifteen years to build a surgeon and an afternoon to copy one. Everyone who died waiting was separated from their cure by distance, and distance is the first thing this technology erases.
1
54
Roxana TEODOR retweeted
A banking professor ran the test on a real bank to settle where money comes from. Almost nobody watches him show the result. Richard Werner, Chair in International Banking at Southampton, Zurich, February 2018. The textbook says banks take deposits and lend them on. The accounting says something else. Watch the section where he lays out the 3 competing theories side by side, then shows which one the ledger supports. A lectern, a conference badge, a dark screen behind him. Central banks published the same answer. The textbooks never changed.
42
516
52
1,886
258,400
Remember this, because it also translates to other places of the world where entrepreneurs build something of value: A facility like Starbase LA isn't just about aerospace manufacturing - it's the difference between food on the table, living without shame, and keeping… “
Replying to @elonmusk
Starbase LA aerospace manufacturing logistics supply chain would have most likely prevented my painful impoverished childhood. Growing up in a family of seven raised by a single mother in poverty, I know firsthand what high-tier regional job opportunities mean. A facility like Starbase LA isn't just about aerospace manufacturing - it's the difference between food on the table, living without shame, and keeping your head held high.
2
48
The journey to reaching rhe 3Ps of Care (precision, Personalisarion, prevention) is closer snd closer to becoming an everyday reality. What an exciting time to be alive!!!
19
What ai find incredibly exciting is that most cancers will be optional in a matter of years (all the technology to make thet happen is already here). A better future IS worth fighting for! And it’s important to have worthwhile goals! Also, much more food is being done alongside!
Elon Musk spoke with tears in his eyes during this speech—that’s the moment that touches me deepest and makes me want to fight with him for the future! "There are a lot of negative things in the world. Terrible things happen all over the world, all the time. There are lots of problems that need to be solved. Many things are miserable and can get you down. But life can’t just be solving one miserable problem after another. That can’t be the only thing. There need to be things that inspire you, that make you glad to wake up and be part of humanity. That’s why we did this. Tsiolkovsky, an early Russian rocket scientist, said: “Earth is the cradle of humanity. You cannot stay in the cradle forever.” It is time to become a spacefaring civilization, to be out there among the stars, and expand the scope and scale of human consciousness. That is incredibly exciting. That makes me glad to be alive. I hope you feel the same way."
26
Charlie Kirk: “If you’re studying economics and they’re not teaching Thomas Sowell, you’re not getting an education. You’re getting an indoctrination. “Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, F. A. Hayek, Frédéric Bastiat... you should know every single one.”
63
1,348
52
6,681
346,460
Thomas Sowell remained a Marxist well into his twenties, even after studying economics at the University of Chicago under Milton Friedman. What changed his mind was his experience working for the Department of Labor in 1960. While studying Puerto Rico’s sugar industry, Sowell found that unemployment was rising as federally mandated minimum wages increased. He expected government officials to share his interest in whether the minimum wage law was actually helping workers. Instead, he discovered that they were more concerned with preserving the law because it provided roughly a third of the department’s funding. That experience fundamentally changed Sowell’s view of government. He realized that public officials, like everyone else, have their own self-interest and that they may preserve programs that benefit them regardless of the effects on those the programs are meant to help.
25
629
18
2,276
30,451
When children start asking about how the world works—terms like communismcan feel impossible to break down. In this latest video, they tackle this exact challenge. Watch as a pair of parents use relatable, everyday examples right from their own home to explain the core concepts of communism to their daughter in a way that actually makes sense to young minds. No dense textbooks or confusing jargon—just simple, real-world analogies that spark curiosity and meaningful family conversations. This is a great way to educate your children in a way that they can understand. Don’t let the educational system or media indoctrinate your children!
🤖 Made with AI
63
1,118
50
2,579
65,273
Most people are economically illiterate, and it’s destroying Britain. We think we’re a top-tier rich nation, but on a per capita basis, we’re not even in the top 20. Instead of arguing and further dividing the country over how to slice a shrinking pie, we need to focus on what actually creates wealth and productivity because taxing wealth won't fix a nation that has stopped producing it.
292
2,443
139
15,989
355,735
Roxana TEODOR retweeted
Jensen Huang got asked about the people technology left behind. He didn't hand over a roadmap. He said the divide already closed. Huang: "All of a sudden artificial intelligence closed that technology divide." That divide was never a gap in human ability. It was a language tax. Huang: "Anybody could be a software programmer now." Every tool humanity ever built collected admission at the door, and the price was always a language. The printing press needed readers. The engine needed someone who could read a manual. The computer needed code. Same shape, every time. The human moved toward the machine, compressed themselves into something it could parse. Whoever couldn't compress stayed outside. Code was a human speaking machine. Seventy years of people translating themselves downward into something a processor would accept. The machine just learned to speak back. Nothing has moved in that direction before. Not once. We sorted people by the toll and dressed it up as sorting by intelligence. The ones who paid became skilled. Everyone else became unskilled, a word that has never described any real person. It only meant fluent in nothing the current market wanted. Huang: "Everybody who are really gifted at their craft but maybe they don't know how to scale themselves with technology, they now have AI to help scale them." The finest cook in a village of four thousand died the finest cook in a village of four thousand. No shortage of talent. A second requirement got in the way that had nothing to do with cooking. Somewhere in your family tree there is a person who was exceptional at something. The world never learned about it. Neither, probably, did they. Ability was never rationed by geography. Access was, and access is the only thing that made it into the record. Every system you pass through in a given day was constructed by the narrow group who could speak to machines. Not the best thinking anyone had. The thinking that survived being translated. We have never seen what everyone else would have made. The scarcity was never in the talent. It lived in the gap between holding an ability and getting it anywhere. That gap was the core product the technology industry sold. Huang: "They're welcomed into the world's economy, not burdened by technology anymore because AI made that possible." Burdened. A century of technology selling itself as pure leverage, and the man who supplies the whole stack just called it a weight. A developer most people couldn't afford. A website breaking on a Sunday with no one to call. You paid the industry for the right to be found. Nobody alive got smarter this decade. The door just stopped demanding a password. Huang: "Five years from now, it is likely that we're all going to be more gainfully employed. The economy is gonna be more productive." He anchors that in a labor shortage already written into the books. Unfilled work with no one showing up, while the same economy panics over a machine that supposedly eliminates jobs. Both stories cannot hold. The fear says there will not be enough work for people. The actual data says there are not enough people for the work. Every time a tool outgrew its need for specialists, the specialist surrendered a monopoly and everyone else inherited a century. Writing left the scribes. Print left the church. Computing left the lab. The barrier was shelter too. Everyone left outside kept the version of themselves that was never put to the test. For most of recorded history that was almost a kindness. The wall turned people away, so you never had to receive the refusal from another person. The wall is down. Now you find out. Nothing changed about you. The requirement changed. For the first time, the only distance between what you are capable of and the people it could reach is whether you move. Interested in AI? Follow @AiEvolutio58513 and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
Jensen Huang joined X and gained 2,000 followers a minute, 5M views in his first hour. His opening post: a thesis on why open-weight models win. Backed by a letter signed by NVIDIA, YC, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir and a16z. The core claim: open source didn't just make 80s software cheaper. It became the foundation the internet, and even US military systems, run on today. The letter says AI sits at that exact inflection point now. Hospitals, startups and universities get to build on frontier models without paying frontier prices. Interested in AI? Follow @AiEvolutio58513 and never fall behind. I track ChatGPT, Claude, and every tool quietly changing how we work and create, then hand you the tested signals.
5
8
1
38
23,801
Virtue signalling at its worse! A feel-good theory leading to catastrophic practical implications for you, your family, friends and neighbours (because to some of them, that increase meant they lost a job, an income, or had to sell their homes). Destruction of the middle class!!!
Congratulations, you taxed the rich. Now half a million people have to pay more so you can feel good.
1
24
Worth remembering: they really thought they were justified. These are not some abstract numbers - they are lives of people, with families and with loved ones, with futures that never came to be. We must never allow it again.
Socialists under Stalin killed 20,000,000 people. Under Mao 65,000,000 The National Socialist Party was **Socialist** All told, socialists are responsible for 100,000,000+ deaths in the last century. Think about that. They will gladly take 100 million more if given the chance. Because they think they are justified. Socialism is the worst ideology ever conceived by man. It is a form of religious extremism where the god is envy and worship is cruelty, justified by greed. It has never "worked" and never will. When idiots like Hassan Piker espouse socialism, they should be humiliated ruthlessly and potentially criminally charged. Same with university professors. Never give it a single inch.
11
Why nature only answers in mathematics (and that in itself is, yes, poetic beauty)…
Richard Feynman stood at a Cornell blackboard in 1964 and explained the problem every AI lab is fighting in 2026. The BBC filmed it. Almost nobody watches it. The lecture is about why nature only answers in mathematics. Every team forcing language models to reason is hitting the wall he mapped 62 years ago. He was 46. The Nobel Prize came 11 months later. The footage survived on film reels and now sits free on YouTube with fewer views than a keyboard unboxing. Watch the blackboard section near the middle. He takes 1 of Kepler's laws and rebuilds it from nothing, with notation a 12-year-old can follow. No slides. No jargon. 1 piece of chalk. An ML engineer I know paused it 4 times and made his whole team watch it before standup. You're 62 years late. The lecture is still free.
24
Roxana TEODOR retweeted
Envy needs an ideology, and socialism has always been happy to provide one. Mises wrote a whole book about this in 1956, The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, and the diagnosis holds up: people who resent the outcomes of voluntary exchange will always search for a doctrine that transforms their resentment into virtue. The woke left found theirs. Notice what wokeism and socialism share at the root. Both start from the premise that unequal outcomes prove injustice. You earned more than your neighbor? Exploitation. One group outperforms another in median income? Systemic oppression. Neither doctrine ever asks whether people made different choices, took different risks, or produced different value for others. Asking that question would ruin everything, because the entire project depends on assigning blame rather than understanding prices, profit, and loss. Once you accept that unequal outcomes equal injustice, you need a corrector. Someone powerful. Someone with the authority to override contracts, seize property, and redistribute according to a moral hierarchy the planners themselves define. That job description has exactly one applicant: the state. This is why the woke activist and the socialist always arrive at the same policy desk, demanding rent control in New York, wealth taxes in Sacramento, hiring quotas in every HR department from Seattle to Brussels. Marcuse and the Frankfurt School figured out decades ago that the Western worker refused to play his assigned role as revolutionary. He got rich instead. Capitalism handed him a car, a house, and air conditioning, and he stopped listening to men promising utopia through expropriation. The revolutionaries needed a new client base. Class became identity, but the machinery stayed identical: oppressor and oppressed, guilt and grievance, revolution and rule. The love affair with socialism, then, follows logically. Wokeism supplies the moral demand for coercion; socialism supplies the economic apparatus of coercion. Neither can survive in a world of private property and voluntary exchange, because in that world you rise by serving customers, not by capturing committees. Venezuela ran this experiment from 1999 onward. The grocery shelves reported the results.
56
851
75
2,154
88,356
“Constructive selfishness” is healthy.
About 250 years ago a quirky moral philosopher named Adam Smith discovered a chain of logic whereby the selfish desires of man would result in widespread prosperity. It’s one of the greatest discoveries of all time. Here’s how it goes… 1.Selfish desire seeks wealth, status, security. No virtue required. This is the raw material, as unpromising as it sounds. 2. In a market with property rights, you can’t take, you must trade. Theft and fraud are policed, so the only legal route to someone else’s money is offering them something they want more. Self-interest is channelled through voluntary exchange. This is the crucial valve: the baker serves your bread not from benevolence, but because it’s how he gets paid. 3.Every voluntary trade creates value for both sides. Nobody trades unless they prefer what they’re getting to what they’re giving. So each transaction is positive-sum by construction. Wealth isn’t moved; it’s made. 4.Competition forces the selfish to serve better. You’re not the only one chasing that customer’s money. To win, you must offer more value, lower prices, or something new. Greed disciplined by rivalry becomes, functionally, service. The customer becomes the boss of every capitalist. 5.Prices emerge as signals of what people actually want. Millions of trades compress dispersed knowledge - scarcity, preference, urgency - into a single number. No planner needed. High prices shout “make more of this” and falling prices say “stop making this.” The cure for high prices IS high prices. 6.Profit directs capital toward unmet needs. Profit is the reward for spotting something people want but can’t get, and losses are the punishment for guessing wrong. Capital flows automatically toward solving problems and away from waste - a self-correcting search algorithm running on selfishness. The profit motive pulls the greedy person towards genuine service and efficiency. 7.The pursuit of advantage drives innovation. The only durable way to out-earn competitors is to do something new - create a better product, a cheaper process. Each entrepreneur trying to get rich makes the previous solution obsolete and the average person’s life better. 8.Specialisation and scale compound productivity. Competition pushes everyone toward what they do best; trade lets them exchange it. Output per person rises. 9.Rising productivity spreads as falling prices and rising wages. Competition doesn’t let producers keep the gains forever - they’re competed away to consumers. The luxuries of one generation (cars, flights, antibiotics, computing) become the staples of the next. The rich get richer, but the poor get richer too. 10. Prosperity becomes self-reinforcing and civilising. Wealth funds education, health, science, and even the welfare state that redistributes it. Commerce rewards trust, reliability, and cooperation with strangers (doux commerce). A system built on self-interest ends up producing the most extensive cooperation network in human history: millions of strangers coordinating to put breakfast on your table. The hockey stick after 1800: from ~$3/day for all of human history to a 30-fold rise in living standards wherever this system took hold is pure magic.
10
The future of Care is 3Ps: Precision, Personalisarion, Prevention. Chapeau to all the scientists working at the forefront of knowledge! I look forward to when a day will come when cancer can truly be called “optional”! What an achievement that will be! Each step matters 👏👏👏
New data in ESMO Real World Data provides a decisive case for the immediate adoption of universal whole genome sequencing (WGS) as the standard of care in Australian oncology. 🧬🇦🇺 ​The study proves the diagnostic superiority of comprehensive whole genome and transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) over traditional, piecemeal panels using routine pathology tissue. For complex cases and cancers of unknown primary (CUP), this multi-omic approach significantly accelerates tissue-of-origin resolution and identifies actionable therapeutic biomarkers at first instance. ​Replacing iterative panel testing with an upfront WGTS model eliminates the diagnostic odyssey and secures equitable access to precision medicine. To deliver truly modern cancer care, Australia must transition WGTS from a specialized utility to the national standard. ​Read the study: esmorwd.org/article/S2949-82… ​#PrecisionOncology #ClinicalGenomics #AusHealth #GenomicMedicine
17
Roxana TEODOR retweeted
America invented the semiconductor. Then regulated it off its own soil. Then spent $280 billion trying to bring it back. Marc Andreessen just laid out the most expensive own goal in industrial history. Andreessen: “40 years ago all the chips were made in California. Why are all the chips made in Taiwan? Because in California, the regulations got set so that you couldn’t make chips in California anymore.” Rogan: “What regulations specifically stop them from being able to manufacture…” Andreessen: “Environmental.” Silicon Valley no longer manufactures silicon. One word gutted the most critical supply chain on Earth. California didn’t lose chip manufacturing to a competitor. It buried the industry in paperwork until it all relocated to an island 100 miles off the coast of China. Andreessen: “And now we have to figure out what to do if China invades Taiwan.” The bureaucracy successfully protected the local groundwater by accidentally manufacturing the coordinates for a global conflict. That is the operating logic of the regulatory state. Strangle. Export. Let the consequences compound for decades. Then position yourself as the only solution to the crisis you manufactured. Regulation never eliminates risk. It relocates it. America traded a fixable problem at a California fab for the possibility of losing every advanced chip in a single afternoon. The administrative class chose paper safety over physical resilience. They would rather watch an industry die under their jurisdiction than see it innovate outside their control. But the regulatory class miscalculated something fundamental. Our vulnerabilities are not a law of physics. They are an artificial choice. And artificial choices get reversed. You cannot secure the future with bits alone. You have to move atoms. The era of exporting survival to protect a bureaucracy is ending. The country that cannot build what it invented has already lost the war it is trying to prevent.
57
401
39
1,193
60,889