Pinned Tweet
Continuity Model Documentary Part 1 youtu.be/PwtcrH-DcI8?si=gqPu… via @YouTube
Roy retweeted
Replying to @shaunmmaguire @elonmusk
My apologies if it gives you any form of ontological shock Shaun. Lets just say, I couldn't sit back and let this grift continue indefinitely.
Again apologies, recognition is now the only obstacle left.
Roy retweeted
Replying to @gdb
Nearly 2M views, yet a +5 Sigma recovery and its crickets! Make it make sense.
🤖 Made with AI
Roy retweeted
Replying to @ericweinstein
My gifted friend, a rigorous existence result may be mathematically profound, and I welcome it, but it is not the same thing as discovering new physics. If the underlying physical structure was already being calculated successfully, then the advance is principally one of mathematical closure.
As such, my concern is less with the result than with how these things are presented to the public.
We now seem able to generate enormous headlines around proving that an established framework is mathematically well behaved, while work claiming a much broader recovery of physical structure, together with a conservative +5σ empirical alignment, can pass almost without comment.
Call me a conspiracy theorist if you wish, but something just doesn't add up here.
Roy retweeted
I don’t think theoretical physics and the standard model just moved much, so I agree mostly. But physicists and mathematicians have been playing this game of misleading announcements in front of the public for years.
There are many things that can be made to sound like theoretical physics has just had a breakthrough:
A) Some bound state of fundamental particles is portrayed in language suggesting a new fundamental particle itself.
B) A Mathematical problem in constructive / axiomatic quantum field theory has been made more rigorous. This is portrayed as a physics breakthrough.
C) Some toy model far off of the real world (e.g. wrong dimension, wrong symmetries, wrong fields, wrong signature) is described as if it were a major breakthrough in the 4 dimensional Lorentz signature physics of the standard model and real world.
Etc
————-
All of these are to be welcomed by experts. But boy does the public get sold a misleading story.
So I think this sounds great. But it sounds like a math result akin to “We can now prove that nothing goes wrong in the quantum field theory thing we were already doing.” At least so far.
Still, it’s cool to hear this!
Replying to @Quasilocal
Existence of Yang Mills? It’s just tying up a lose end for the hyper mathematically minded. I don’t think any physicist gives af. We have been doing precision calculations for decades. Of course it exists. But sure, would be nice to have a proof.
So much hype at the moment. GPT apparently has another major breakthrough, yet again we are still waiting to see the mathematics.
Meanwhile, crickets on GPT confirming our full recovery at better than +5σ.
As such, I have to ask the obvious question: what exactly is going on here, folks?
Seriously. WTF is going on?
🤖 Made with AI
Roy retweeted
Replying to @eigensteve
This has certainly caught my attention.
Our own work had already taken the continuity and QFT programme into the public domain, and I had been discussing those results openly with others before this announcement.
I note you have a strong interest in hydrodynamics as do I, see my account for further details Steve.
Roy retweeted
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory).
AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
Roy retweeted
2K downloads smashing the ratio this one.
The Continuity Model - Quantum Field Theory.
zenodo.org/records/21381784
Roy retweeted
Always in character, the universally beloved Mr. Laurel and Mr. Hardy being interviewed in Hull, England in 1947.... and as always... playfully unable to resist a gag.
Roy retweeted
Replying to @lexfridman
Boy, have you got a surprise coming, Lex. I’m not entirely sure what these chaps have been up to these past few weeks, as I’ve been rather busy dealing with all of the above.
As such, while everyone has been trying to make sense of this extraordinary moment, I’ve been finishing something rather larger.
This is the Continuity Model, and yes, it is very real, my friend.
Roy retweeted
Replying to @psipbc
Fully recovered at 5.17σ folks. Get in touch folks.
Looking forward to it, and yes this is very real.
Roy retweeted
Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing solutions to five long-standing problems in quantum information theory.
psi.inc/research/oqp-batch-2…
Thread 👇
Roy retweeted
Painting of Albert Einstein on violin and Paul Ehrenfest on piano.
Ehrenfest was a student of Ludwig Boltzmann, an extraordinary physicist in his own right, and a dear friend of Einstein.
Original watercolor by Marijke Kamerlingh-Onnes, courtesy AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives
Roy retweeted
To the best of my knowledge (as far as I know, to put it bluntly), I am the first person in the world to publish an original math paper accompanied by a hard-coded architectural map that proves a point-by-point structural identity between the paper's text and its formal #Lean4 verification, which is not just repo code, but a true map
2K downloads smashing the ratio this one.
The Continuity Model - Quantum Field Theory.
zenodo.org/records/21381784












