![[Person one] Thank you 👏 I’m tired of seeing criticisms of TST (regardless of who it’s from) automatically be written off as “that was in the past,” “we don’t want social discourse,” and I’ve even seen someone say something along the lines of “stop talking and read the room.” It’s honestly incredibly disappointing how needlessly defensive people get over basic and valid criticisms about TST when someone calls out something negative about Lucien, TST history, ways TST chooses to participate in activism etc. Why can’t we accept that no religion is perfect and will always have flaws or problematic points, including our own? [Person two] 2 days ago The issue is that it is the same old arguments that people just keep trying to rehash. Am I obligated to have the same discussion over and over with every throw away account QS makes? It seems to me like the people who want to talk about the same issue again and again every day](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUoQNJ6UYAE7BIc.png?name=small&format=webp)
ALT [Person one] Thank you 👏 I’m tired of seeing criticisms of TST (regardless of who it’s from) automatically be written off as “that was in the past,” “we don’t want social discourse,” and I’ve even seen someone say something along the lines of “stop talking and read the room.” It’s honestly incredibly disappointing how needlessly defensive people get over basic and valid criticisms about TST when someone calls out something negative about Lucien, TST history, ways TST chooses to participate in activism etc. Why can’t we accept that no religion is perfect and will always have flaws or problematic points, including our own? [Person two] 2 days ago The issue is that it is the same old arguments that people just keep trying to rehash. Am I obligated to have the same discussion over and over with every throw away account QS makes? It seems to me like the people who want to talk about the same issue again and again every day



























