RT (@rtcoffee123) header
RT (@rtcoffee123) profile picture

Shitposter supreme

Joined June 2020
Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)Photo by RT (@rtcoffee123)
Pinned Tweet
Mood rn:
1
1
3
738
AI may well be able to write massive software projects “from scratch”, but that almost certainly isn’t the fastest / highest performance / highest security / most token efficient way to do things. Good building blocks matter. In addition to RL’ing the agents on final task loss, we should try to get them to regularize the building blocks as well. What would the standard library look like that makes the agents most effective? It is likely at the limit that it turns out to be some alien organization of code, but given the existing human-bias in training, I bet that in the near term it would be lovely code that old programmers would appreciate. I suspect the same could be said for mathematics, but that is out of my lane.
231
250
49
3,357
295,875
AI-generated math solutions are not solutions, they are data, we should view them as that when trying to understand, interpret, & ask the next question.
30
23
9
134
8,520
9
920
45
3,871
56,956
There is a single neuron that, when knocked out in fruit flies, makes them unable to stop having sex (Crickmore & Vosshall, Cell 2013)
L6N5401-0.75 seems to be the 'DJ neuron' - it puts everything into the context of a DJ set
62
244
81
5,638
198,852
if you're a technical person that is sad right now, don't worry it's just a phase, you're going through ego death you will complete the journey, you will come out the other side and your lifeforce will return
very weird thing happening rn technical people are sad, they think their skills are now useless non-technical people are desperately wishing they were more technical so they could use agents better
43
33
3
727
23,299
jesus fucking christ, tulu
38
31
44
768
87,611
I’m sorry but this is one of the funniest post I’ve seen in a while. 😂
125
7,082
283
68,429
665,498
One of the subagents just made a figure so bad that the lead Claude immediately killed them and replaced them with a new agent.
79
134
20
8,627
173,083
I think it's becoming rather clear that ALL of mathematics will become possible to formalize rather soon. There are deep implications: 1. Mathematics becomes super interactive. Formalizations make it easy to browse, recombine, and build mathematical proofs from components. 2. Each new idea and paper can be checked much faster. The deep part is meaning and explanation. Validation is almost automatic. 3. Optimization and identification of new proofs can be done partially via agents, and humans can contribute much faster with great new ideas. Proofs from the Book are possible at scale. 4. Scientists and people at large can finally use mathematical artifacts as black boxes with trust and confidence. We can commoditize mathematical theorems. I think the mathematical enterprise also becomes very gamified. We can clearly see each unproven statement as a concrete goal, identify existing tools and directions, and focus quickly on what's missing. And everyone can contribute, with agents or through understanding. Soon, new languages and new theories will also develop, but the structure will keep growing steadily, with no mistakes and on fundamentally solid foundations. Hilbert's dream is becoming a reality. One important caveat: mathematics is by no means trivial now! It's just becoming extremely well-structured and laser-focused. I think the jump in capacity, quality, and scale will be massive. I also hope that our understanding of the big picture will remain solid, because there will be a lot to grasp.
18
42
10
331
18,210
Finite simple groups are building blocks of finite groups, like primes are for whole numbers. The “Enormous Theorem” states that every finite simple group belongs to one of the known infinite families or is one of 26 sporadic groups, including the Monster. There are no others.
5
63
5
585
69,809
can't believe it's actually working
OpenAI has announced to three new discoveries in mathematics, computer science, and physics: - Local smoothing and the Kakeya conjecture - The Exponential Time Hypothesis is false - Existence of quantum chromodynamics and completions of the Standard Model
22
102
10
2,108
67,631
to the theoretical mathematicians, computer scientists, and physicists worried that their livelihood is getting destroyed by ai everything is gonna be alright i was in computational neuroscience, a niche field where the goal is to build computer models of the brain the paradigm used to be some scientists hand-construct a neural network model and compare it with the brain for example, people spent decades trying to build models of the visual cortex around 10 years ago, people realized that the computer vision models that ai researchers built turned out to be better models of the brain's visual cortex than anything else designed by humans then the same thing happened to language, llms turned out to be the best models we have on how language work in the brain over time, people just moved more from hand-constructing these models to analyzing the ai models, or adjusting the ai models themselves same is going to happen in theoretical math, cs, and physics people will go from doing the work themselves by hand, to focusing on understanding the work ai put out & improving the ai system it's gonna be fine
34
22
7
337
67,469
Again ❤️‍🩹
26
1,099
91
5,966
128,709
i regret to inform you that all of science is now linear algebra
all of science is either pipetting or linear algebra
32
377
27
8,662
118,868
all of science is either pipetting or linear algebra
3
19
4
168
121,695
2023: GPT-4 almost solved grade-school math 2024: IMO silver 2025: IMO gold 2026 May: Erdős unit-distance conjecture 2026 Sep: Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem solved 2026 Oct: 722 AI-written math manuscripts Today: OpenAI proves ETH is false Tomorrow: P = NP?
121
212
35
4,094
220,507
A key thing lost in the lab automation push is that 80% of scaling scientific research looks like this -- getting more data out of the same labor steps with one-pot protocols. Unlike with lab automation there's no natural constituency that makes $ from telling this story
Maybe controversial: the conversation about scientific bottlenecks is overfocused on automation. New measurement technologies deserve more attention. You could automate an assay that needs an entire facility – or you could REINVENT the assay so that it fits into just a few tubes.
5
8
95
5,660
It took 362 pages of pure logic to prove that one plus one equals two. Russell and Whitehead built mathematics from the ground up in Principia Mathematica. Numbers became classes of equinumerous sets. Addition was defined through unions of disjoint classes. Only after hundreds of prior theorems did they reach the final step: 1 + 1 = 1 + ‘1, and 1 + ‘1 = 2, hence 1 + 1 = 2. Even the simplest truth required an entire logical foundation to stand. Certainty is expensive.
77
216
39
1,176
79,162
The complexity theory result is actually huge. P problems can be solved in polynomial time. It was widely believed that NP-complete problems require exponential time. P = NP states that NP-complete problems can be solved in polynomial time. OpenAI didn't prove that. But, they proved that (some) NP-complete problems can be solved faster than exponential time, meaning: - P = NP, or - the complexity of NP problems is a "middle thing" between polynomial and exponential, eg. O(n^log n) If it survives peer reviews, this could be one of the biggest CS breakthroughs in decades.
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory). AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
56
194
30
2,507
252,385