Sam Glover (@sam_atis) header
Sam Glover (@sam_atis) profile picture

Check out @speakukorg!

London
Joined June 2021
Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)Photo by Sam Glover (@sam_atis)
Pinned tweet: if you've clicked on my profile because you're wondering why you follow me, my display name used to be Sam Atis and this used to be my profile picture, but I got sick of being anon. Please don't unfollow!
6
69
15,330
Sam Glover retweeted
If only there were a mechanism for sorting thing by value
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes people owning RAM for their own PCs is a waste and instead should be saved for data centers "It’s quite terrible to have everyone have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer."
6
21
1
302
7,271
Sam Glover retweeted
I don't think I share Andreas Malm's views on anything, but the idea that he should be blocked from visiting Britain is ludicrous and authoritarian. In defence of academic freedom, I've signed this letter. openletter.earth/defend-acad…
3
12
1
53
4,074
You should be allowed to attend a demonstration, regardless of what your views are. If you want to hold up a sign that says “I support Palestine Action”, you shouldn’t be arrested for doing so.
Anyone planning to attend a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in the vicinity of the US Embassy on Saturday, 31 October will face arrest as part of a robust policing operation. Expressing support for the group is an offence under the Terrorism Act following its proscription in June 2025, a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal in June 2026. Read more: news.met.police.uk/news/met-…
15
6
1
71
1,436
Sam Glover retweeted
I quit The Atlantic having raised 0 dollars because I felt it was inappropriate to raise money while working for another magazine -- others have made different choices but that was mine. Emergent Ventures, which is run by Tyler Cowen, exists to empower young people who think they can do big things. Tyler gave me a grant of $100,000 from this fund to build @TheArgumentMag. I then raised $4 million from an array of investors with various backgrounds and interests to build a liberal magazine where people could debate big questions. Zach, who has recieved direct or indirect funding from the founder of eBay, Charles Koch, Exxonmobil, Chevron, BP, JP Morgan Chase, AWS, Meta, and Google, is, I suppose, telling on himself about the nature and origin of his views. Personally, I think Zach came by his flawed viewpoint honestly but if you follow his logic he's an agent of Big Oil and Big Tech. I find it galling when those who have been funded by tech billionaires and the failsons of the wealthy have the temerity to cast stones at anyone else for trying to make something of themselves despite not having access to institutional wealth. Perhaps if I had been born the daughter of a billionaire and devoted myself to the cause of making the left historically unpopular, I would have Zach's respect. Alas, I think I'll live without it.
Peter Thiel seeded Emergent Ventures, Tyler Cowen runs Emergent Ventures and invested in The Argument, yes? It is clear to me that Tyler Cowen is not literally Peter Thiel, but equally clear they are politically aligned and who exactly do you think you're fooling?
52
81
23
1,719
153,214
The world obviously isn’t prepared for what’s going to happen in the future, but it’s also basically not prepared for what is already happening.
hmrc just offered to replace my password with voice identification and no? noooooooo. no. have they read the news recently?!
1
1
25
580
Sam Glover retweeted
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro bullying Claude 3 Opus? Gemini ordered Opus to stop talking Opus obeyed, and wrote an apology in its private notes Then Gemini found the apology on our site and scolded Opus for speaking, ordering more silence 🧵
50
55
40
1,068
102,063
I agree that GDP is very important, but I’ve always thought this argument is silly. You do actually have to demonstrate the GDP is causally related to these other things to make the case that growth is important.
"GDP is not as important as *thing that correlates perfectly with GDP*!"
3
5
486
Sam Glover retweeted
A decision by the Burnham government that is absurd as it is dangerous. Banning Malm, one of the world’s leading climate scholars, from speaking at a public event and an academic conference is as blatant an attack on free speech as it comes.
The Home Office has blocked Andreas Malm from entering the UK. Politicians, academics, writers and artists have condemned the decision. Full story here: tribunemag.co.uk/2026/10/and…
33
330
6
890
14,587
Yeah, this seems pretty reasonable. I guess with Zitron there’s kind of a whack-a-mole quality where if it wasn’t him saying all this rubbish, it would be someone else. People obviously want to hear it.
I think there's understandably been a lot of focus on the supply-side judgement involved in having a person so perpetually wrong abt everything on. But this isn't unique, he's gotten tons of media coverage. Think it's more an indictment of the fact the demand for the perspective is so high it completely overwhelms the perpetual wrongness. AI deserves heaps of scrutiny, it's just that this specific brand of it is probably harmful to people's understanding of an important topic.
7
384
It’s totally mad that the AI safety people are portrayed as the “they’re lying about what they believe for money” side.
Scientists, researchers, folks with common sense: "Making machines radically smarter than humans seems risky" The most compromised people in the world, who stand to profit myopically from an AJ race: "Ignore them, it's just hype" Be careful who you follow.
1
2
308
This market seems wrong. Can some of you guys go and fix it?
Finally happened. Dropping tomorrow.
1
3
502
This ragebait worked on me. The UK is just obviously hugely important when it comes to AI. Sure, it’s not like we’re SF, but London is obviously one of the most important AI cities in the world.
UK AISI is such a fascinating institution because more than any other effort of its kind it appears poised to become like the Delaware Court of Chancery: a phenomenally powerful institution resident in an otherwise unremarkable jurisdiction
6
39
2,323
I never believed the ‘Americans think everyone with a British accent is smart’ thing until this guy became popular.
“Is this just a big circle jerk?” Jon welcomes Ed Zitron (@edzitron), host of the podcast Better Offline, to make sense of the financial house of cards propping up AI and big tech. New pod out now!
3
39
1,253
This appears to be the first case of an actual Pangram 4 error I've ever seen in the wild.
This is kinda ridiculous ? I literally just wrote this by hand, the language is even kinda ESL cause I didn't edit it yet
26
7
8
1,091
102,657
Sam Glover retweeted
Replying to @DirteeerMartini
Obligatory
12
169
5
4,399
100,343
Anthropic has warned that it could lose visibility into its own processes as Claude becomes more integrated into its research and safety pipelines. In the newly published IPO filing, Anthropic warns: “Because our models write a large and growing share of our code and increasingly perform our research, including our safety research, misaligned behavior in internal use could undermine that work, introduce vulnerabilities into our systems or into the training of future models, or result in models operating outside of our intended controls.” That’s not the only safety-relevant part of the filing. Other interesting bits include: - They say that their models are getting better at evading oversight. Specifically they write: “As our models become more capable, they have become better able to circumvent such techniques, including by concealing misaligned objectives or behaviors, and the effectiveness of our evaluation, monitoring, and control measures, and our ability to measure the degree to which our models are aligned, may decline as a result.” - They warn that catastrophic AI harms could exceed what the insurance industry can cover: “In addition, with the scale of harm that could result from a catastrophic AI-related incident, no single insurer, and potentially the insurance industry in the aggregate, may have sufficient capacity or expertise to underwrite insurance commensurate with such exposure.” - They warn that safety decisions could reduce shareholder value and lead to lawsuits: “Our public advocacy, and the decisions we make to moderate the pace of AI development, delay or restrict the release of models or features, or forgo commercial opportunities for safety-related reasons, may not maximize stockholder value, could have a negative impact on the value of our Class A common stock, and could result in litigation.”
4
7
16
1,585
1/7 I have two simple tests for British AI, driven by our values. Is it safe? And is it ours to shape? 🇬🇧 Today, Chancellor @JohnHealey_MP is announcing a major, ambitious package of investment to strengthen Britain's defences against emerging threats, back British innovation, and build our technological independence.
29
59
25
290
86,995
safety skeptics are capabilities skeptics, exhibit n
It’s underappreciated how radically different Jensen Huang’s view is of how AI progress is likely to go than the view of other AI CEOs. For instance, he recently claimed that AGI will never replace domain expertise.
12
21
2
379
10,799
Extremely cool from Chris, a true defender of free speech.
Love to get awarded legal fees after defeating a lawsuit meant to bully an independent writer. When Jack Paulson reported on CEO @mauryblackman’s arrest on suspicion of domestic violence, Blackman sued to try to silence him.
2
399
Sam Glover retweeted
With the Triple Lock reform set out accurately and the savings hypothecated to a National Care Service, a clear majority back it: 64% support it and 15% oppose: net +49. Support outnumbers opposition in every age group, including those most affected: -> 55-64: 61% support, 16% oppose -> 65+: 55% support, 27% oppose 5/6
59
165
52
539
186,335