Sam Weinstein

New essay: andrewchen.substack.com/p/ne… NEW FOUNDER ARCHETYPES IN THE AI AGE Solo founders - Why: Solo founders can do 100x with AI, so they can ship a v1 when previously they couldn’t have before - Why not: Maybe a team of cofounders still makes more progress. Maybe you can agentically code but someone still needs to do a million meetings with customers. Maybe coding was never the main bottleneck for startups in the first place? Non-technical founders - Why: There’s elite talent that comes from areas like finance, consulting, who can’t code but are passionate about business. There’s also folks in creative industries who create all day but just not in code. Now they can build - Why not: Why not: Maybe AI makes it easier to build a prototype, but there’s still a big gap between a demo and a reliable product that can scale. If everyone can build the first version, maybe technical judgment becomes more important in deciding what to build, what’s actually possible, and how to stay ahead as the product gets more complex. (especially true for product categories like dev tools/etc) Domain experts - Why: A doctor who works at a hospital understands all the problems they face each day. A real estate broker really gets the subtleties of their markets, their clients. Same with a soldier, teacher, etc. What if they could use software to solve their own problems and build business along the way? - Why not: Hoteliers didn’t create Airbnb and the finance industry didn’t create Kalshi. Sometimes you just need an outsider’s view in order to reinvent an industry, versus building incremental improvements Kids, high schoolers, college students - Why: Young people have already been building products early on. Start with a Minecraft mod, a Roblox game, a Discord bot, and suddenly you’ve learned how to make something that thousands of other people use. Now add AI, and a kid with an idea can build way more, way earlier - Why not: Building something your friends love is very different from building a company. You still have to hire, raise money, manage people, and figure out how to make money. And maybe young founders have an advantage in consumer products because they understand their peers, but much less of one when it comes to enterprise software, healthcare, or other industries where experience and relationships really matter. Sometimes you just need domain expertise Content creators - Why: They’re already creating. So instead of creating videos, maybe the same skills can go into creating software. Plus, they have distribution. They know what their followers care about, how to get their attention, and how to reach them without paying for ads. In the past, turning that audience into a software product meant finding a technical cofounder or hiring a team. Now a creator could build and launch something themselves, and immediately put it in front of millions of potential users. - Why not: Having followers helps with a spike of distribution, but building a sustainable growth engine is something else. The most valuable products aren’t memes - they are long-running, long-growing products that need to be endlessly tweaked and iterated on. Does the DNA work?

Ben Horowitz on the two skills that will matter more than ever before in an AI world: creativity and relationships. "I think those are things that are hard to get out of today's AI in a very good way. So if you don't have instincts around those things, I don't know if all the AI in the world could help you. Whereas the grind-them-out tasks, AI is already really good at." "Do you have original ideas? Can you establish and maintain very high quality, high fidelity relationships with people off the rip? I think people don't think about that enough." "One big advantage I think that we have is we really look for that. Many just ignore that whole thing, like it's not a thing... It's a thing." @bhorowitz w/ @Tocelot

.@naval on Creativity: “Technology is a tool. You can use it for anything. You can use it for consciousness. You can use it for unconsciousness. Social media brings people together—but it can also bring people together to form digital mobs and fight each other. It can play on both sides. Unfortunately, I think that in many cases, the destructive power of technology arrives before the creative power. But the creative capabilities of technology are actually unlimited. The destructive side has a limited downside. What happens when you destroy something? It ends. But when you create something, it's almost impossible to predict the levels it can reach. No one sitting around in Jesus' time, for example, could have predicted anything like what is happening here today. It would have been impossible. Because the ability to combine, recombine, and create new things—new forms of life, new systems, and new civilizations—is unlimited. But if you want to talk about destruction, it always ends the same way. It's just barren.”