Pinned Tweet
. @FBI i recognize this person. that is @LexaproTrader , he is the man in the image below
We are asking for the public's help identifying this person of interest in connection with the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.
1-800-CALL-FBI
Digital media tips: fbi.gov/utahvalleyshooting
Seee 🧲 retweeted
they propping price with paired tokens but what they dont tell u is when paired tokens go down, the price of the paired coin also goes down
can we have a launchpad that doesnt do these paired shit and ends pvp ?? we need raydium back
Announcement: We're Decoupling from Stonkfun
We've made the decision to move away from Stonkfun for future launches, while maintaining the main Stonk pair on $LAUNCH.
**What does this mean for $LAUNCH?**
More fees towards buybacks and burns, creating a stronger flywheel for $LAUNCH.
- Why the change? -
We've been in discussions with the Stonkfun team since yesterday about introducing custom token pairings, allowing tokens launched through our platform to pair directly with $LAUNCH.
Unfortunately, progress has been slow, and we don't want our ability to innovate to depend on another platform.
Currently, Stonkfun routes launches through LaunchLab, meaning we're effectively building on top of two platforms, limiting the fees we capture and the flexibility we have.
**By moving to our own bonding curves, we remove that extra layer, retain more fees, and gain full control over our infrastructure.**
- How will it work? -
We're introducing a **3% fee on all launches**, split as follows:
- **1% — $LAUNCH Buyback & Burn**
- **1% — Launched Token** (supporting its ecosystem)
- **1% — Platform** (development and growth)
### What does this unlock?
- Custom token pairings, including direct $LAUNCH pairs.
- Continued support for Stonk pairs.
- More fees flowing into the $LAUNCH flywheel.
- Freedom to introduce new features and flywheel mechanisms without third-party approval.
- Full control over our bonding curves and infrastructure.
### The Bigger Picture
This isn't about cutting ties unnecessarily. It's about removing limitations and building an ecosystem where every launch contributes to $LAUNCH.
We want to move faster, innovate freely, and ensure more platform activity directly benefits our ecosystem.
**More control. More flexibility. More buybacks. More burns.**
**We're building for the long term.
Seee 🧲 retweeted
I see that $LAUNCH is trying their own way to better the space.
Unfortunately doing it via @LaunchOnSF you can’t eliminate the issues as they operate via @Raydium.
I could create a launchpad that fixes every issue people are voicing in a couple of hours.
But would anyone even use it or just rotate back to @pumpfun after a day?
Seee 🧲 retweeted
Everyone pitching $LAUNCH as the "anti-Pumpfun savior" needs to look at what is actually happening on-chain right now 🤡
A quick Solana RPC check on the deployer wallets and marketing claims shows a completely different story:
1. "100% Buyback & Burn Every 3 Mins" vs. 566 SOL Hoarded
Despite over $7.8M in 24h volume across pools, total on-chain supply is still 989,893,291, only 1.01% burned all day. Meanwhile, the master deployer wallet (HgKfki…xVdk) and its linked fee wallet (5CEbue…SPAG) are sitting on 566.2 SOL (>$100K) and 38.3K STONK, routing SOL between each other every minute while "hot-fixing" buybacks that were turned off for hours.
2. The Single Hot-Wallet Exploit (1,946 Dev Mints)
It isn't a custom smart contract. It's a frontend wrapper calling Raydium LaunchLab from a single hot wallet (HgKfki…xVdk). Because the backend API wasn't protected, someone spammed it into deploying nearly 2,000 junk tokens today, flagging the dev wallet with 1,946 mints and knocking the site offline with HTTP 429 errors.
3. Sniper Distribution & "2% Auto-Dump" Fix
Their own curve graduated in 4m 29s with ~19% scooped by early snipers split neatly into <3% wallets (AEtL29…U8Dk, CMQgBR…W5Q9, 5uxLEt…XcfZ), which have been unloading $3K–$12K clips into retail as mcap dropped from $4.2M to $1.7M. Even wilder: at 17:45 UTC the dev tweeted they are adding a "2% developer buy on every coin that will instantly sell" to fight snipers.
4. Zero Official Stonk Fun Backing
The X account was created today at 08:39 UTC, has zero endorsement from @LaunchOnSF.
Great narrative hook on paper, pure fee extraction under the hood. Always check the fee wallets before buying the "fair launch" pitch. NFA.
Pump fatigue just got its first real token.
$LAUNCH went live on Stonk Fun around midday CET, graduated near $40K and printed a ~$2.35M high within ~6 hours.
Why it moved:
• The pitch is pure anti-Pumpfun: no dev Block 0 bundles, duplicate tickers blocked for 60 min, 100% of creator fees recycled into buybacks + burns every 3 min
• The announcement did 100K views off a 1.5K-follower account. That's organic reach, not a raid
• Jupiter organic score 83, 250+ organic buyers, ~5.2K holders in under 7 hours, top-10 ~16%, no wallet above 4%
The part most people miss: the main pool is paired against $STONK, not SOL. Roughly 70% of today's volume went through that pair, so every LAUNCH bid is also a STONK bid.
Risks: the deployer wallet shows ~290 prior mints, and a couple of mid-size wallets sold ~$27K into the ATH push. Snipers are still allowed by design.
The narrative is real. The chart is a 50x-in-a-day chart. Size accordingly.
they propping price with paired tokens but what they dont tell u is when paired tokens go down, the price of the paired coin also goes down
can we have a launchpad that doesnt do these paired shit and ends pvp ?? we need raydium back
Announcement: We're Decoupling from Stonkfun
We've made the decision to move away from Stonkfun for future launches, while maintaining the main Stonk pair on $LAUNCH.
**What does this mean for $LAUNCH?**
More fees towards buybacks and burns, creating a stronger flywheel for $LAUNCH.
- Why the change? -
We've been in discussions with the Stonkfun team since yesterday about introducing custom token pairings, allowing tokens launched through our platform to pair directly with $LAUNCH.
Unfortunately, progress has been slow, and we don't want our ability to innovate to depend on another platform.
Currently, Stonkfun routes launches through LaunchLab, meaning we're effectively building on top of two platforms, limiting the fees we capture and the flexibility we have.
**By moving to our own bonding curves, we remove that extra layer, retain more fees, and gain full control over our infrastructure.**
- How will it work? -
We're introducing a **3% fee on all launches**, split as follows:
- **1% — $LAUNCH Buyback & Burn**
- **1% — Launched Token** (supporting its ecosystem)
- **1% — Platform** (development and growth)
### What does this unlock?
- Custom token pairings, including direct $LAUNCH pairs.
- Continued support for Stonk pairs.
- More fees flowing into the $LAUNCH flywheel.
- Freedom to introduce new features and flywheel mechanisms without third-party approval.
- Full control over our bonding curves and infrastructure.
### The Bigger Picture
This isn't about cutting ties unnecessarily. It's about removing limitations and building an ecosystem where every launch contributes to $LAUNCH.
We want to move faster, innovate freely, and ensure more platform activity directly benefits our ecosystem.
**More control. More flexibility. More buybacks. More burns.**
**We're building for the long term.
Seee 🧲 retweeted
Quick rundown of what goes live within a few hours:
Creator fees: The creator earns a cut, but it's unlocked by holder count and token age, not by volume. That makes the dev's best move growing the coin instead of dumping it, and it's the exact opposite of Pump's "farm fees and leave" model.
Reputation launch and score: Creators have to tie their X account to their RayPad account, meaning teams can't remain anonymous and will face backlash for bad launches. So each creator will have a reputation score, which they grow by having solid launches on Raypad.fun.
After these goes live, we have a huge surprise planned for the trenches.
Seee 🧲 retweeted
exposing all pump and fomo paid kols in next tweet and exact amount they get paid to lure their followers to get rugged
imma be the first to say this
if pump used the $8M they paid Kimchi to pump a community coin, let's say they bought 8M worth of neet. That would pump neet from 20M mcap to approximately 450-560M market cap.
now imagine the normies that are invested in neet tellin their family and friends "pump bought $8M of a coin and I made 5 figures of it in an hour". I can put my life on the line that would onboard more normies than giving Kimchi $8M to make a pf acc. anyone else agree??
exposing all pump and fomo paid kols in next tweet and exact amount they get paid to lure their followers to get rugged
imma be the first to say this
if pump used the $8M they paid Kimchi to pump a community coin, let's say they bought 8M worth of neet. That would pump neet from 20M mcap to approximately 450-560M market cap.
now imagine the normies that are invested in neet tellin their family and friends "pump bought $8M of a coin and I made 5 figures of it in an hour". I can put my life on the line that would onboard more normies than giving Kimchi $8M to make a pf acc. anyone else agree??
Seee 🧲 retweeted
imma be the first to say this
if pump used the $8M they paid Kimchi to pump a community coin, let's say they bought 8M worth of neet. That would pump neet from 20M mcap to approximately 450-560M market cap.
now imagine the normies that are invested in neet tellin their family and friends "pump bought $8M of a coin and I made 5 figures of it in an hour". I can put my life on the line that would onboard more normies than giving Kimchi $8M to make a pf acc. anyone else agree??
imma be the first to say this
if pump used the $8M they paid Kimchi to pump a community coin, let's say they bought 8M worth of neet. That would pump neet from 20M mcap to approximately 450-560M market cap.
now imagine the normies that are invested in neet tellin their family and friends "pump bought $8M of a coin and I made 5 figures of it in an hour". I can put my life on the line that would onboard more normies than giving Kimchi $8M to make a pf acc. anyone else agree??
