selectiveecho (@selectiveecho) header
selectiveecho (@selectiveecho) profile picture

Writer, Editor (Selective Echo TBA), Critic, Arts/Culture Journalist. Contributor (The Utah Review), Immigration Reform Advocate. #BlackLivesMatter #BearsEars

Salt Lake City
Joined May 2008
Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)Photo by selectiveecho (@selectiveecho)
selectiveecho retweeted
This is a really good unpacking of the reality with the new preference signal launched upon the rest of the web by Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft. And an especially good point on the search monopolist. techpolicy.press/what-the-ne…
8
10
916
selectiveecho retweeted
FLIPPED SEATS: Despite overnight results, these are the Republican incumbents in Utah poised to lose their seats if current results hold, breaking the GOP supermajority in the Utah legislature. Kirk Cullimore (Senate majority leader) Jill Koford (Senate) Jason Thompson Tiara Auxier Jason Kyle Jake Sawyer Melissa Garff Ballard Matt Macpherson Anthony Loubet Jim Dunnigan Chris McConnehey Ken Ivory Clint Okerlund Steve Eliason Jordan Teuscher Jake Hunsaker Luke Searle Norm Thurston Two other House seats appear to have flipped as well but there weren’t incumbents running. @abc4utah
23
27
12
227
18,130
STOP LEGISLATING LIKE ASSHOLES. It’s not that hard.
Utah’s election results tonight are scary. U.S. Congressional elections are too close, and CD-01 was too big of a loss. State house elections saw more democrats elected and even a DSA-aligned representative elected too. We can’t just sit around anymore. We need to be proactive in the fight to save Utah’s soul.
6
157
3,854
selectiveecho retweeted
Where the Utah State House stands right now The Utah GOP will lose their supermajority in the State House when the results finish. The threshold to break the supermajority is 25 seats.
9
65
4
841
16,116
selectiveecho retweeted
We should just legally prohibit such NDAs.
Exclusive: Workers inside Google’s AI division are pushing executives to waive their non-disparagement agreements, arguing they must be free to inform the public about the risks of the technology they are working to advance, according to sources. wapo.st/48wGIeg
25
140
4,680
selectiveecho retweeted
📝STATEMENT: It’s clear that Google underestimated the rising parent backlash against AI and EdTech, and now it’s scrambling in the face of a PR nightmare. But this ‘clarification’ doesn’t appear to change the fact that students won’t be able to use Google Search without being subjected to Google’s AI. The company is clearly banking on Search’s popularity to lure schools into consenting to use Google’s AI. Schools shouldn’t be fooled by this bait and switch. The good news is that it appears that Gemini, Gemini Notebook, and Search will now be off by default. Schools should leave them off, because Google’s AI tools aren’t safe for kids and undermine learning and critical thinking. fairplayforkids.org/statemen…
We want to clarify what we announced today about our education services. Today’s announcements give schools more choice, not less. Here’s what we announced: - Gemini, Gemini Notebook, and Search will be OFF 🔴 by default. This is based on K-12 schools asking for more control over student use of AI services. - Schools are in control: They can choose to turn ON 🟢 one, two, or all of these services individually. - We are also updating Search for schools to make it better for learning. Specifically, AI Mode and AI Overviews will offer step-by-step guided learning through problems, so that students don’t get quick answers to schoolwork. We know there’s concern about students using AI to shortcut schoolwork, and schools have told us they want control. That’s exactly why we are making these changes today to address the feedback we’ve heard from educators in recent months. And we’ll continue to engage deeply with educators to ensure we are giving schools more choice, more controls, and improved Search for learning.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Google's post claims schools can turn on Search independently from AI services like Gemini for more choice. Google executives stated Search and AI are deeply integrated, so schools enabling Search must accept AI features with no separate opt-out. blog.google/products-and-p… nytimes.com/2026/11/03/us/… theverge.com/tech/1025411/g… arstechnica.com/ai/2026/11/goo… techcrunch.com/2026/11/03/goo… androidauthority.com/google-to-turn…
5
147
5
590
14,498
selectiveecho retweeted
That is, of course Jeffries knew about "Lawyer up" and so forth. But you don't get to float above it, either.
As for Jeffries and so forth, the line should be the following: "We are here first and foremost to make sure every American is fed and keeps the lights on. But along with that we have to look at the people and processes that got us into this mess, and put them where they belong."
2
4
43
4,196
selectiveecho retweeted
Montana voters approved a ballot measure to ban corporations, nonprofits and labor unions from doing business in the state if they made political contributions. State's rights v. Citizens United. Will be fun to see SCOTUS deal with that one. Bravo Montana!!!
77
1,755
113
14,872
241,352
selectiveecho retweeted
Iran won a consolation prize tonight. Iran’s theory of victory was that squeezing the US with the Hormuz weapon would threaten to wreck the GOP in the midterms, and this threat would coerce the Administration into making concessions; above all, on the Hormuz question. That theory failed. The costs imposed were real. They caused a global cost of living crisis. They turned US voters decisively against the president and cost his party the midterms. But they failed to persuade the US to capitulate. The key mistake was the failure to adjust Iranian strategy after Iran lost the battle of Hormuz and oil flows returned to prewar levels. This persuaded the Administration that the worst could be contained and defeat avoided; that it could even hope to prevail in a protracted war of the sieges. Iran did secure a key secondary objective tonight: it has dealt such a gut punch that any future president will think twice before attacking Iran again. However, this was a one-time cost. The pain has been inflicted and absorbed. It still faces a stubborn Administration that it not now going to capitulate. The cornered rat might lash out or not. But it is hard to see him capitulate any time soon. Tehran is celebrating a major political victory and its newfound international status. But the strategic task has not been accomplished. It is playing for an audience of one. Iran has to find a way to persuade the Administration that it can make the costs prohibitive. How can it do that? I have argued at length that Tehran has indeed discovered the correct channel for pain delivery. But it has refused to follow through on it. My fundamental assessment is that they will be eventually forced to actually implement the new response function, whether bc a US escalation discredits the diplomatists and removes their veto, or bc the Iranians start suffocating from the anaconda’s grip around their neck. Things must get a lot worse for them to get better. A temporary ceasefire may be needed for R&R but ultimately it is just kicking the can down the road.
27
32
3
316
31,401
selectiveecho retweeted
We now have a lot more evidence about the election. Although a few key races remaining outstanding, it's now clear it's a Democratic wave. A few thoughts: 1. The Dems won the House as expected. But by more than polls/models predicted. It will be about 245-250 seats, rather than 235-40. Among other things, this means the DSA contingent will NOT be essential marginal votes, and thus probably can't hold soon-to-be House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries hostage. 2. In the Senate, the Dems now have 53 seats, and will likely end up with 55-56, once we get results from Michigan, Nebraska, Mississippi, and Alaska. They won in places like South Carolina, Kansas, and Iowa, which - until recently -few thought were even possible. And they won some big races (e.g. Texas) by bigger than expected margins. The fact that Mississippi is on the list of close races (with a Black Democrat within a point of the Republican incumbent) is incredible. 3. Survey data shows tariffs and to a lesser extent immigration played important roles in the result. I hope this means policy shifts on those enormously important issues, and that Dems will work to reverse what Trump has done and pare back executive power here. 4. Trump said the election should be about him, and he got his way! His unpopularity and that of many of his policies (especially tariffs and the War in Iran) was decisive. He made the Democratic Party Great Again, and he alone could do it. 5. The results on this are not fully in. But it looks like some of the GOP gerrymanders (e.g. - Texas and North Carolina) may turn into "dummymanders." In a wave election, gerrymanders can work to the disadvantage of the party that did them, because they thin out that party's margins in some previously safe seats in order to transfer those voters to seats held by the opposite party. 6. It is notable that Trump - so far - said he was going to accept the results, rather than try to challenge them, or do things like declare an emergency, send troops to seize ballots, and the like. But I won't feel fully secure on this for some time yet. 7. I hope this means MAGA will go into terminal decline and lose its grip on the GOP. But it is far too early to predict that. To be clear, we don't just need a repudiation of Trump. We need a repudiation of his deeply evil agenda on immigration, trade, civil liberties, and undermining the Western alliance, among other things. Not clear to what extent Republicans will be willing to do that. 8. While I think it's good Dems won (at least at the federal level), I still have a long list of reservations about that party and its agenda. They are less bad than Trump. But that's a low standard of comparison. And I still worry about the potential further growth of the DSA socialist wing. Even most more moderate Democrats support way too much regulation and spending, and are indifferent to the looming fiscal crisis facing the nation (on that latter point, they are much like Republicans). Tonight was a good night compared to the alternative. But we still face huge challenges, and still have two badly flawed major parties. And we are still beset by a number of structural flaws of democracy, such as widespread voter ignorance.
141
212
13
3,310
1,101,582
selectiveecho retweeted
As for Jeffries and so forth, the line should be the following: "We are here first and foremost to make sure every American is fed and keeps the lights on. But along with that we have to look at the people and processes that got us into this mess, and put them where they belong."
1
30
3
217
8,826
selectiveecho retweeted
Democrats are being handed a mandate to actually do shit. Stop Trump. Impeach him and all who followed his illegal actions. Pass a NEW New Deal that would improve our lives if not for Trump vetoes. Enforce laws. Prosecute all the corruption and constitutional violations. GET BUSY IMPROVING LIVES
20
68
4
242
3,218
selectiveecho retweeted
Last night, Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) told me something I keep thinking about: While Democrats may want to celebrate, they need to remember that this isn't a sporting event. This is Americans sending the strongest signal possible that they are in pain, and hurting, and want help. Now Congress needs to answer that call. It was powerful stuff, and if the party is smart they'll follow his instincts.
88
1,965
82
10,026
162,164
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more. Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go. Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all. So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man. Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure. On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular! What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it. Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population. The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world. Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline. Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side. That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
655
3,411
501
30,825
4,096,290
selectiveecho retweeted
Reminder that Kirk Cullimore supported SB258, a law giving the power of the Government to large Republican donors. I also remember the time when he snuck in language to a bill that allowed Hideout in Wasatch County to annex land in Summit County, thereby disenfranchising us from our local government when it came to planning such land. We're still dealing with that mess right now. To my fellow Republicans, this shock therapy is not a bad thing. It shows that we will hold them accountable for their corruption, and I hope that those who want a political future are paying attention. Pass some laws for the voters, and stop looting the treasury or you're next.
Things are not looking good for Kirk Cullimore. I am worried that seat is going to flip blue.
3
4
1
36
1,027
selectiveecho retweeted
🚨SUPER MAJORITY AT RISK: Republicans in Utah’s legislature are at risk of losing as many as 18 seats - which if current numbers hold, the House goes from: 61 GOP 14 DEM to 43 GOP 32 DEM House Republicans need 50 to be at super majority status. Also, Senator Kirk Cullimore - who’s a contender for Senate President is one of those at risk.
18
60
24
553
38,247
Fucccckkkkkkk Utah republicans.
Holy Smokes. Amendment B looks to be going down in 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
5
16
624
41,076
Oh my god is the slumlord going to get evicted?
These could be two major upsets in the Utah Senate.
3
3
54
1,875
selectiveecho retweeted
RESULT: Sherrod Brown is returning to the Senate. And this is a special election—so he will replace Husted soon, bringing the GOP majority down by a seat for some of the lame-duck session.
1
77
3
878
20,987
selectiveecho retweeted
lol, you’ve been community noted, Google Comms.
Google and Meta have the same PR spin. It’s getting tiring. I read the below as hiding the ball. Like with training on publishers’ intellectual property, Google appears to be bundling AI Overviews and AI Mode with its adjudicated illegal search monopoly.
2
21
64
2,142