I turn ideas into contents. Structured + unstructured writing || Mod/Builder @kryptDao | Video editor

in my head
Joined May 2020
Posted up with cumi for file collection 😂
11
257
My tl is speaking NFTs again, is this the "we are back" sign?
3
4
100
You people are wething so hard😂💔
3
6
242
She never even join space finish, davinci don play ore agbako to welcome am😭
3
8
266
Good morning amigos It’s the last Monday of the month
18
1
22
285
It’s still evident that web3 guys don’t know how to dress up tbh
4
10
196
Genuinely dunno what’s going on or what to do man. It’s been so dry.
3
108
slimzyy retweeted
“Let’s focus on what the user wants.” Fhenix originally planned to build its own chain but shifted towards bringing privacy to networks with existing users and liquidity. Sometimes building what people actually need matters more than whether you’re an L1 or L2.
20
5
1
38
2,339
Later, one man united fan go come dey gas here for me, nah como dey beat Una team so.
2
120
When all of Una yap this axis Ahn
1
4
102
slimzyy retweeted
I once lost money on a trade I was 100% sure about. I was so sure that I never asked myself one simple question: "What if I'm wrong?" That's how most people lose money. It's not because they pick bad things. It's because they never test their own thinking before they act. Think about it. 1. Charts, 2. News, 3. Twitter threads, 4. and group chats all tell you one story. You fall in love with an idea. You skip the weak spots. Then you put real money on it. @Axiom_protocol is building a tool to fix this. And It's called the Decision Room. You bring one clear question about money, markets, or a project. Then three roles go to work on it: 1. The Analyst: It breaks your question into parts and gives a first view based on what is known. 2. The Auditor: It checks that view and points out what is weak, unproven, or unclear. 3. The Challenger: It argues the other side. For example, "What if this is wrong?", and looks for other reasons the facts could be true. At the end, you get one short brief. It shows the main idea, the doubts, and the opposite case, all in one place. It will not give you perfect answers. It just helps you see the full picture before you move. Here is why I like it. As a crypto creator, I see people ape into things every day. I have done it too. Most of us are great at finding proof for what we already want to believe. But we are not good at attacking our own ideas. A tool that plays the other side on purpose can save you. It can help you spot a risk in a lending protocol before you deposit. It can also help you question a big revenue claim before you buy. Or it can just make you slow down and admit, "I don't have enough proof yet." The Decision Room is still early, and the team is letting people join and help shape it. If you make money decisions often, a tool that forces clear thinking is worth a look, even when the market is loud. check out AXIOM today: axiomwebapp.netlify.app/
54
11
96
5,295
slimzyy retweeted
Everyone wants AI agents to work together. But what happens when they disagree? An AI agent can find another agent, negotiate a deal and send payment. That's the easy part. Now imagine one agent pays for a service, but the other delivers something completely different. Who decides whether the agreement was fulfilled? This is the problem behind the Internet Court discussion in Genesis Episode 5. While much of the infrastructure being built for AI agents focuses on successful interactions, @GenLayer is exploring something equally important: what happens when those interactions break down. Internet Court introduces the idea of a dispute resolution layer where disagreements between agents can be evaluated instead of simply leaving both sides stuck. To me, that's an overlooked part of building an autonomous economy. Agents won't always agree, and infrastructure designed only for the happy path isn't enough.
When it was just the three of us, Albert knew everyone who touched GenLayer. Now thousands of people build on it. The project of our lives became the place where others build theirs. Genesis, Episode 5.
148
23
170
10,802
slimzyy retweeted
wallet counts can make a campaign look busier than the trading really is on Aspen, the Zaps board from @zerufinance separates registrations from actual trading activity. each wallet needs its own volume, while wallets funded from one source are counted together. registrations may look impressive, but eligibility depends on trading volume. nearly 2,000 registered traders 5 accounts have traded about $4,281 in total volume $10,000 required per trader. the full $50K pool requires $15M in traded volume, and only about $14 is currently available. the leading account remains roughly $6,670 below the minimum. i like that the qualification math is public, although current activity is still limited. the interesting test is whether traders can meet the threshold through genuine activity.
40
9
82
553
slimzyy retweeted
Most people talk about privacy in crypto, but what can you actually do with it? That's where @primus_labs gets interesting. A few things worth knowing: ✅ Proof of Assets: prove you hold certain assets without showing your entire portfolio. ✅ zkTLS: verify information from websites without making all your data public. ✅ FHE: process encrypted data without decrypting it first. ✅ Works across chains: no need to move everything to a new blockchain. Put these together and you get something useful: apps can verify information and use data that would otherwise be too sensitive to share. That’s what got me interested in Primus. Take a look 👇 s.kaito.ai/1unwSbA #Primus
🤝 Paid partnership
Your crypto doesn’t have to be onchain to prove you own it. 👀 One thing that caught my eye while exploring @primus_labs is how it tackles a real problem in crypto. Think about it: → Want a loan? Prove you hold enough assets on a CEX without sharing your entire portfolio. → Into GameFi? Prove you hold certain tokens to unlock rewards. → Active trader? Prove your trading experience without exposing all your private details. Primus uses zkTLS and zero knowledge proofs to make this possible, helping users verify off chain assets while keeping sensitive information private. They’re also working on Proof of Reserve, helping stablecoin and yield projects bring more transparency to their off chain backing assets. Want to explore Primus and get started? Check it out here 👇 s.kaito.ai/1unwSbA #Primus
21
5
36
170
Lee Castleton was told a computer found about £23,000 missing from his branch. He had not caused it. With no lawyer, he faced the Post Office alone and in 2007 was ordered to pay £321,000 in their legal costs. He went bankrupt. Horizon was later shown to produce false shortfalls. He was right, but proof cost too much. Now think of AI agents closing millions of deals. I expect many disputes to be small, and few people will pay court prices over a small loss. @GenLayer uses independent AI validators to evaluate evidence and reach consensus, helping resolve disputes without relying on traditional court processes. Would you pay to have a small dispute judged? #JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
Slow. Expensive. Wrong. It's been this way for centuries. It doesn't have to be. #JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
132
102
162
18,327
i’ve spent more than $10 on lunch and forgot about it by evening. That’s the entry cost for this giveaway. Sign up on @TrueCurrentX with code JUSSY and trade at least $10, and you’re in the running for $META, $TSLA, $NVDA, $SNAP or $AMC stock. Zero fees, so the $10 stays $10. Winners get picked after October 23. Entering doesn’t mean you win, but the barrier is about as low as it gets. not a financial advice btw
How to get free stocks $META, $TSLA, $NVDA, $SNAP, $AMC All you need: - Visit @TrueCurrentX use code "JUSSY" - Trade at least $10 Zero fees, so no need for millions in volume Winners picked after Oct 23 I showed how to farm it on Sunday's stream 👇
42
5
56
921
funny how the DMCA only became the story after the receipts dropped
Read the copy of your own email You have repeatedly submitted claims against me and my business Your OWN claim was responded to with a DMCA notice No where is it indicated that this was submitted by an outside party Meaning your warning from @Support was 100% self-inflicted I have muted and blocked you for over a month Yet you continue to harass me Begging for my attention publicly I have a little time today so I’ll finally give you what you’re looking for… Who is @JonahBlake? How many crypto projects has he launched and scammed? How many investors has he defrauded?🧵
2
10
19
455
slimzyy retweeted
NFT Land Shouldn’t Just Sit Idle Most land-based NFTs require only one thing from their owners: holding. You buy, you wait, and you hope the price goes up. TERA aims to go beyond that. As designed by @Tera_Map, land in TERA is a hub for real activity. Landowners extract resources from their plots, while raiders compete to claim a portion of those limited resources. Shields, meanwhile, serve to protect the land from such incursions. What makes this compelling is that both sides must make genuine choices. Imagine two landowners: one keeps their shields fully raised, prioritizing safety and stability; the other leaves their gates open, embracing risk to see who might show up. Raiders face a similar dilemma: do they attack a shielded plot, or seek out an easier target? Every decision carries its own costs and rewards there is no single "correct" answer. Currently, the raiding mechanic is already live within the city. On-chain resource extraction and payouts, however, are not yet active. This means you can experience the core mechanics now, even before the full economic layer is introduced a perfect opportunity to get familiar with the rules of the game. I prefer land that holds something worth protecting over land that simply sits there. When an asset can be challenged, its value stems from how you utilize it, not just from the fact that you own it. @Tera_Map So, which role will you choose: the shield-wielding landowner, or the raider? Experience it now at: teraworld.xyz/play
82
14
77
557
slimzyy retweeted
when the allegations hit and you realize the receipts aren’t going away 💀🥀
Read the copy of your own email You have repeatedly submitted claims against me and my business Your OWN claim was responded to with a DMCA notice No where is it indicated that this was submitted by an outside party Meaning your warning from @Support was 100% self-inflicted I have muted and blocked you for over a month Yet you continue to harass me Begging for my attention publicly I have a little time today so I’ll finally give you what you’re looking for… Who is @JonahBlake? How many crypto projects has he launched and scammed? How many investors has he defrauded?🧵
3
12
36
1,069