⋆˚࿔ riya 𝜗𝜚˚⋆

i can't believe you are making me post this, but i'm gonna make it most explained as i possibly can. CASE 1: fuckass guy who (in his very words) peeked at little kids in school through a wall hole as a teenager + said something really odd about women with big-sized breasts = NEVER went to court for this, NEVER faced charges, was NEVER allegedly kicked out of the company for his history *CONCLUSION → bizarre behavior as a teenager and bizarre mindset about women as an adult, was never held accountable for sharing this as a funny story/joke but SHOULD. however, he is a rich kid from a very influent family + from my perception, this issue never really came to bother or reached thai audience for some reason. probably and unfortunately, will never face the consequences for his weird behavior, perhaps not even if there's public pressure, like in J's case) **ADDITIONAL INFO → what you personally think ("to me, this only shows that people tend to follow those they are close to or have some kind of relationship with") does not correspond to reality. gmm artists follow almost everyone as basic procedure in joining the company. most of the artists there followed him YEARS ago when he or they first joined (depending on who's there first or joined after), but most don't maintain a SINGLE contact with him. ❗unfollowing someone really isn't something gmm artists normally do when one's involved in polemics, simply leave or even both. there's a LOT of examples for this.*** CASE 2 (the current accused): allegedly took photos of an actress changing in starlympics bathroom = SHE/OTHERS ALLEGEDLY CALLED THE >COPS< ON HIM = THE VICTIM ALLEGEDLY TOOK IT TO >COURT< IN AN OFFICIAL LEGAL CASE = HE WAS ALLEGEDLY >KICKED OUT< OF UPCOMING PROJECTS AND DISMISSED FROM THE COMPANY FOR IT *CONCLUSION → ALLEGED AND DIRECT SEXUAL HARASSMENT (CRIME)/COURT BATTLE AGAINST AN ACTRESS THAT IS A COWORKER OF THE ARTISTS WHO ARE UNFOLLOWING HIM. **even an artist who is NO LONGER a gmm artist for TWO (2) whole years unfollowed him. ***makes the mass unfollowing even more serious and suspicious. now, can you understand the difference? besides the striking contrast between these two situations, to say that the artists' social media activity shouldn't be perceived as a reaction in response to this situation is to be ignorant, considering that they may very well be doing this to support/back up a potential VICTIM of, again, >SEXUAL HARASSMENT< who is a friend of them without publicly compromising themselves and being affected by slapp (strategic lawsuits against public participation)/thai defamation laws. stop being dense.