Pinned Tweet
Out today: a year ago in @techpolicypress , @rscarlets + I argued that the US TikTok ban would create what it ostensibly aimed to prevent: risks don’t disappear, they get displaced, oversight fragments, and transparency declines. the next year ran a live experiment.
What’s striking isn’t just that the ban failed on its own terms. It’s how the fix reproduced the same tensions under a more complex structure: algorithm IP licensed, not transferred; data hosted domestically; influence questions deferred rather than resolved.
New in @pandsociety: Why do TikTok and Instagram—platforms with nearly identical features—produce such different creative cultures? I offer a framework comparing how each constructs authenticity, creativity, community, and discovery through governance, rhetoric, and design.
Technical convergence doesn't produce cultural convergence.
Open Access:
doi.org/10.1177/297686242513…
New article out with @wishcrys in @policyinternet
We analyze what happens when young people become internet-famous on TikTok—and neither legal protections nor platform policies are enough to address the risks they face.
The gaps are filled, unevenly, by the TikTok public.
We call this patchwork governance—a layered, improvised mix of law, platform policy, and community intervention.
Gossip, speculation, and call-outs may seem like noise, but they often do the work of protection.
📄 Open access here: doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70003
Would love to see REM latency and heart rate recovery on @WHOOP - any chance that’s on the roadmap cc @willahmed
REM latency question inspired by this post
Stop what you're doing right now and check the sleep data from your wearable to assess your brain’s potential amyloid plaque burden.
This is from a new paper that was just published.
Instructions:
1. identify the time you fell asleep.
2. mark when you had your first REM sleep cycle.
3. calculate the time it took from falling asleep to your first REM cycle.
4. If <90 min, that's good.
5. If >180 min, that's bad.
For example:
Asleep by 10 pm.
First REM cycle 11:30 pm.
That's 90 min.
My average this week is: 70 min.
REM Latency REML: is the time elapsed from falling asleep and the beginning of the first REM stage. The study found that compared to lowest 25 percentiles of REML (<98.2 min) participants in the top 25 percentiles of REML (>192.7 min) had significantly higher amyloid plaque burden in their brains
Study identifies a novel sleep parameter as potential marker for Alzheimer disease.
Rem Latency (REML); the delay in REM sleep (dreaming phase) initiation predicts increased amyloid plaque burden in the brain, an increase in dementia marker p-Tau181 and a drop in the brain health marker BNDF in the blood.
This parameter has a great potential as a novel risk marker for Alzheimer and dementia since as it can be easily calculated from every wearable.
In more detail:
Published this week, the study involved 128 participants (64 with Alzheimer's disease, 41 with mild cognitive impairment, and 23 with normal cognition), mean age 70.8, 56.9% female.
Participants’ sleep was tracked using polysomnography (gold-standard for sleep monitoring), brain amyloid burden was determined using PET scans, and blood markers p-Tau181 (early prognostic marker for Alzheimer disease), BNDF (Brain health, function, and regeneration marker, drops in Alzheimer disease patients)
REM Latency REML: is the time elapsed from falling asleep and the beginning of the first REM stage. The study found that compared to lowest 25 percentiles of REML (<98.2 min) participants in the top 25 percentiles of REML (>192.7 min) had significantly higher amyloid plaque burden in their brains, increased p-Tau181 and diminished BNDF levels, all signifying existing undiagnosed, or future risk of Alzheimer disease.
This is a very practical marker that yields itself very useful to self-monitoring using wearable devices, as well as further studying and validation in large remote population studies since it can be calculated using sleep data reported by almost any of the wearables available on market and already used by 100s millions of individuals around the world.
My sleep this week shows an average RAML of 70 min which puts me at the ideal spot for this marker.
You hear this so much, but it's dead wrong.
The "algorithm" isn't a standalone thing at all - it's interwoven with the platform's design, constraints, & vibrant user community. Trying to separate it from that context misses how TikTok really works. The power is the system.
I think that this point right here is so, so central to what *socio*technical research can offer in this moment.
The backend “algorithm” is (sort of) an unknowable black box, but the stuff we can see is far more interesting and relevant.
Talked with a Bytedance engineer in Shenzhen. He thinks the internal consensus is that algorithm of TikTok/Douyin is not even the best in China, Kuaishou’s is better (in getting people engaged). The core asset is the chaotic ecosystem of creators/users/business/platform/management formed around TikTok and between TT and Bytedance that offer quick and great monetary reward to good content. It means Bytedance itself may not be able to recreate it if a ban upsets this ecosystem. It also means even if the algorithm is sold, the TikTok US may not be as successful without decisionmaking informed by Bytedance’s global business and knowhows.
Read this a few days ago and it’s both interesting and useful - I think this is a great framing for how differently *discovery* works on TikTok.
New research by @paologerbaudo argues that TikTok has transformed social media from 'networked' to 'clustered' publics, where algorithmic interest-based grouping replaces friend-based connections fundamentally changing how we experience and interact online doi.org/10.1177/146144482413…
Sharing @rscarlets and I’s piece again given what’s going on today - such a moment of uncertainty given Trump’s explicit push for the Court to delay vs. their seeming openness to uphold the law today.
techpolicy.press/the-tiktok-…
Alex Turvy retweeted
My brill friends @rscarlets & @soc_of_internet remind us that bans "aim to reduce risks but instead fragment oversight, drive users to less regulated spaces, and reduce transparency while claiming to increase security" 🔥👇
New piece with @rscarlets: The TikTok ban won't work—it'll create exactly what it claims to prevent. Bans don't eliminate platforms, they transform them into less governable forms. Our analysis of the paradox at the heart of platform restrictions is out in @techpolicypress now:
New piece with @rscarlets: The TikTok ban won't work—it'll create exactly what it claims to prevent. Bans don't eliminate platforms, they transform them into less governable forms. Our analysis of the paradox at the heart of platform restrictions is out in @techpolicypress now:
Thanks to @blakeplease for your help thinking through this piece!















