Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric) profile picture

Field Sales Representative w/BW-Fusion. Helping growers get the most out of their input decisions. .All thoughts & comments are my own.

Elm Creek, NE
Joined March 2015
Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)Photo by Eric Steiner CCA (@steiner_eric)
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
The fertility is already in your soil. Getting it to cycle is the work. A soil that functions gives your crop more to work with. So don’t just add more fertility. Make more available. #agronomy #soilhealth #farmtok #cropcast #biocastmax
1
6
255
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
This soil doesn’t exist. Grid sampling blends every zone into one bucket — an average that matches none of them. Start every decision from what’s really in your ground. Not a guess. That’s BaselineRx. #Agriculture #SoilHealth #PrecisionAg #Agronomy #BaselineRx
6
1
19
1,500
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Dumping more on there isn’t a strategy. Understand the soil, work with Mother Nature, and stop paying for what you don’t need. #BWFusion #BaselineRx #soilhealth #agronomy
5
12
622
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Left: four zones, four soils. Right: what you get when you blend them. That pile doesn’t exist anywhere in your field.
1
2
6
795
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Grid sampling can hand you a number for a soil that doesn’t exist. Sample the zones that actually do. #BaselineRx #PrecisionAg
6
12
621
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Fertilizer isn't getting cheaper, and buying more isn't the answer. Sean Nettleton and Blake Hadley are teaming up for a Crop Cast Live webinar on how to get more from your soil and make every pound count. Oct. 23 · 10 AM ET / 9 AM CT Register now>> us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi…
4
6
437
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
BaselineRx gives growers actionable soil data to put every fertility dollar where it works. Brad Bornemeier, founder of @AgNext, is getting more out of his acres with it. #BWFusion #BaselineRx #Ag365 #SoilFertility #CropNutrition
5
1
8
602
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Your plant has a sensor for ethylene, the hormone that drives ripening and stress response. Researchers found that sensor doesn't work without a copper atom sitting in it. And that's just one of copper's jobs. It helps move energy through photosynthesis, it helps build the lignin that keeps stems standing, and it keeps pollen fertile so you actually set grain. When copper runs short you see pale plants, twisted dead leaf tips in wheat, and in bad cases heads that don't fill. Copper doesn't move much in the plant, so new growth shows it first. Where do we see it? Organic soils hold copper tighter than any other micro, so high-OM ground, sands and high-pH spots are the ones to watch. Here's the catch: this is a nutrient I have seen nearly 0 responses to by applying it on its own. Have you had luck? One exception for me is on wheat. Next up: molybdenum. #NextLevelAg #Agronomy365 #The5Percent #copper #agronomy
2
8
33
2,073
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Building soil P is expensive. The math and the field don’t agree. Just jumped in the combine helping the family farm . Bean yields around here have been pretty good. Can’t speak for everybody, but overall solid. Quality’s a little off. I was listening to a video saying phosphorus needs to be 50 ppm, preferably 100. We just finished a field that made over 60. Around here most APHs are 43 to 45. Mother Nature gets the credit. She did the work. That field tested 3 to 10 ppm phosphorus. Do you really believe another 10, 12, 15 bushel was sitting there just because the soil test number was higher? I ran the math with Grok on building this ground to 50. 11-52-0 at $1,152 a ton is $1.11 a pound of P₂O₅. University data (Iowa State, Minnesota, SDSU, Tri-State) says it takes about 16 to 20 pounds of P₂O₅ to move a Mehlich-3 test 1 ppm. From 5 ppm to 50, that’s roughly $900 an acre on paper. At pH 7.2, calcium ties a lot of that up. Figure 40 percent fixation and you’re closer to $1,500 an acre before you even count crop removal working against you every year. Then ask how many bushels that takes to break even. Chasing that ppm, I’d go broke — or I’d be better off buying more land. We foliar fed this field several times. No check strip, so I can’t prove it paid. I believe it did. Exudation drives phosphorus uptake, stimulation and plant health drives exudation. The more you stimulate the crop, the more phosphorus gets in the plant. - both are important soil P and Uptake. Can’t spend it all just to get it applied to the soil. I’m not anti-phosphorus. I want P in the field. I’m anti-losing money chasing a magical ppm. South Dakota cash beans are about $12.40 tonight. At that price, $1,200 an acre is 97 bushels. $2,000 is 161 bushels. Spread over five years, you need an extra 19 to 32 bushel every single year just to get your money back. Not once. Every year.
20
10
4
103
17,274
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
We are now going into year 6 of aggressively cutting back Nitrogen fertilizer on several hundred thousands of acres annually through our recommendations. Happy to see more people waking up to the opportunities. Concern- don’t do it blindly and then have a disaster. Measure and monitor and let your fields give you the answers. Success from Nitrogen cutbacks comes from efficiency which is driven by a plan not by accident. #Baseline RX #agronomy365#nextlevelag
2
7
1
39
3,999
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Same field. Five different soils. Why would one average tell you the truth about any of them? Stop averaging your soil. That's guesswork. #Agronomy #BaselineRx #SoilHealth #BWFusion
3
8
532
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
By the late reproductive stages, a lot of your phosphorus is fixed again. Here's why 👇 Every night a healthy plant kicks out 30–50% of its exudates to keep the microbes happy, and the microbes feed the plant. Under stress it saves those sugars for the grain and forgets about the root. #phosphorus #agronomy #rhizosphere #soilmicrobes #corn #plantHealth
3
4
40
3,911
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
We apply $100 worth of phosphorus. Why can't we get that $100 back into the plant? 🤔 Most growers get between $10 and $30 of it back that year. We think that could be $70–$80, just by maintaining better microbial levels, and allowing the plant to ask for it. #phosphorus #soilhealth #agronomy #farming #soilbiology #fertilizer
13
39
3,602
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
53,000 seeds per bushel. Grain analysis samples are rolling into the lab, and the spread is eye-opening. One field we just ran came in at 53,000 seeds/bu in one zone and 59,000 in the other. For reference, last year's largest seed we saw was about 57,900. Other samples are coming in around 90,000. Same 56 pounds of corn creates that bushel. At 53,000, each kernel carries about 70% more weight than a kernel at 90,000. So what does that tell us? It tells us how well the back half of the season was managed, did we get rain to finish. Kernel numbers get set early, but kernel weight gets built during grain fill. That comes down to keeping leaves green, holding plant health and nutrition through late summer, and keeping the plant filling until black layer. That's a lot of yield potential sitting on the backside of the season. A Grain analysis test shows you where you landed. Send in two ears and get plant nutrition and grain size back. Pair it with a soil test and you can see what to manage differently next year. #GrainAnalysis #Corn #Agronomy #GrainFill #NextLevelAg
8
6
1
79
13,491
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Residue either works for you. Or it costs you. Sean Nettleton and Devin Baker break it down live on Crop Cast tomorrow, Sept 25. Register now to join the conversation>> us06web.zoom.us/webinar/regi… #Agronomy #CropNutrition #BWFusion
3
10
475
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Fertilizer's too expensive to guess. Measure what the soil needs. Supplement the gap. #agronomy #BWFusion #BaselineRx #Zones #fertilizer
5
15
913
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Just Get pH Right? Does getting soil pH “right” lead to more nutrient availability? Yes, but also no. Life in the soil is not one dimensional. When considering pH, we should also be considering Eh (soil redox potential). There are management decisions that can influence both pH and Eh, and these two metrics should be thought of together. Redox Potential (Reduction and Oxidation) Reduction= gain of electrons (H+) Oxidation= loss of electrons or gain of Oxygen To make it easier to understand, I think about a plant oxidizing the atmosphere (adding oxygen) and the roots reducing (adding H+) to the soil. Reference the Pourbaix diagram I’ve attached to see how pH and Eh relate. There are more of these charts you can find to see where different nutrients may become available to the crop. You can find this by looking for Olivier Husson’s work. It makes sense why pH is considered and Eh is not. pH can actually be measured on a soil test. But even pH is not static even though we treat it like it is. Either way, there are management choices that will impact both. Here are some examples of an overly oxidized, reduced, and a more balanced system. Overly Oxidized: -frequent tillage -dry soil conditions, low residue cover -low OM/low WEOC -nitrate based fertility -low biological activity All results in high Eh and slightly alkaline conditions plus nutrient tie-ups Overly Reduced: -heavy clay w/ poor drainage -high OM and/ or manure inputs -compacted, anaerobic subsoil -waterlogged for extended periods of time All results in low Eh and more acidic conditions plus anaerobic microbial activity. Blueish gray looking soil that might smell rotten. A more balanced system: -living roots as much as possible -minimal tillage -mixed nitrogen sources -good biological activity -ground cover -aggregated soil All results in moderate Eh and slightly acidic to neutral pH. Leads to nutrient cycling and resilience.
Most overlooked aspect of soil tests in NE IA.... IMHO it is soil pH. I see way too many acres that have grid sampling done & no action taken on correcting soil pH. Technical definition: -log (H+). Which means the more hydrogen ions you have the lower your pH goes. Generally for soils in NE IA if more than 10% of your CEC is occupied by H+ you likely need to take corrective measures to adjust pH. pH drives soil biological activity and thus nutrient availability. When I see pH levels in the mid 5's and even in the 4's we know there is significant yield loss. Our studies show soil pH should be 6.3 to 6.7 in row crops to optimize yield. Two columns on most soil test results. Soil pH and buffer pH. Soil pH tells you yes or no you need to correct. Buffer pH indicates amount of product like lime you need. Once corrected & soil is in balance you can often times go a lengthy period without additional applications. Be sure to be checking out your soil tests during this rain delay!! Contact your local Pioneer sales rep with questions.
1
6
29
3,561
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Most fertility arguments start in the wrong place. They argue about the rate. They rarely challenge the question of what produced the rate. If your soil report mostly answers extractable stock — OM · pH · P · K · grid averages — that is useful inventory. It is not proof that roots can access what the crop needs, that biology is cycling fuel, or that organic N is anything more than a snapshot of mineral N today. Outside-the-box agronomy asks different questions: • What is plant-available — not just extractable? • Is biological activity actually running? • Is there usable carbon fuel, or only a full warehouse of OM%? • Is labile organic N context — or are we banking a fake pound credit? • Are we managing zones with soil + tissue in season — or one PDF and a hope? - how many cycles will this soil give us in a growing season? Measurement without a decision system still leaves you guessing the rate. Challenge the report. Then challenge the recommendation method behind it. #SoilHealth #PlantHealth #NutrientEfficiency #Agronomy #PrecisionAg #BaselineRx #IndicatorComplete #NextLevelAg
1
7
1
36
4,849
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Your homecoming royalty for 2026! King: Kole Steiner Queen: Chelsea Kottich Congrats!
1
3
368
Eric Steiner CCA retweeted
Stop overspending on commercial fertilizer. Your soil's already loaded. BiocastMAX breaks the nutrients loose so your crop uses what's already there. Do more with what you've already got. #BiocastMAX #BWFusion #CropNutrition
6
8
459