Joined February 2009
Stephen Pollard retweeted
Haviv Rettig Gur, whatever you think of him and his views, hosted me twice on his podcast to speak about Palestinian perspective and views, no matter how divergent and different mine are. He did not condition his hosting upon me appearing next to other Palestinians who disagree with me or agreed with him, or even other Israelis; he did not set this up as a debate, but as a conversation and a discussion that was elastic and allowed for mutual learning and engagement, not "gotchu" moments, even though we strongly disagreed on a variety of subjects. On the other hand, Mr. Mehdi Hasan would not entertain talking to me after he blocked me for two years on social media unless I debated another Palestinian who disagreed with me on his platform, "Zeteo News," with him as the moderator of said debate. He was not interested in a one-on-one conversation with me as he has done with several other guests of his. You make of that what you will but it is absolutely the case that Zionists can often be exponentially easier to engage and speak with than anti-Zionists and the oracles of the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex, particularly when it comes to embracing new and diverse Palestinian perspectives outside of the militantly-enforced orthodoxies, for the anti-Israel crowd is almost always interested in making a point, never actually making a difference.
Mehdi once wrote a book about how to win an argument even when you know you’re wrong. The trick is to be manipulative and dishonest. Mehdi has never to my knowledge talked seriously about the Israeli historical experience as he demands of me for Palestinians. And Mehdi is accusing me of ignoring Palestinians in an interview that, though it was meant to be focused on the Israeli experience, talked a lot about Palestinians. I’m starting to think Mehdi isn’t an entirely trustworthy guy.
46
337
17
2,370
50,065
Stephen Pollard retweeted
She is something else.
Kamala Harris just spoke in Las Vegas and it seems she's testing out a new oratory style. It's worse than you can imagine.
300
270
23
3,043
94,100
Stephen Pollard retweeted
"I am shocked, shocked to find, after three years of weekly hate marches, and my colleague and mentor, Ed Miliband, helping legitimise the government of Iran (prior to a terrorist attack) and delegitimise Israel, that Jews don't feel as safe in the UK." bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq39…
4
17
73
1,181
Stephen Pollard retweeted
This is a dreadful call. The Rooney case is far removed from the Ayatollah Khomeini suborning the murder of a British novelist. And NS should take care: under the editorship of the paedophile Peter Wilby it published a notorious antisemitic cover suggesting a ‘kosher conspiracy’.
If you ever sought out the novels of Sally Rooney in bookshops – when that was still possible – you’d know they sit in the fiction stacks adjacent to the novels of another SR whose books have been withdrawn in dastardly political circumstances. Until last week, “Rooney” and “Rushdie” had little in common beyond being shelfmates; now they have more than just a physical proximity. @tanjil_rashid_: This is censorship by other means newstatesman.com/comment/202…
4
36
241
7,991
Stephen Pollard retweeted
Israelism - the belief that everything must revolve around the Israel, to only take interest if Israel is involved, to always blame Israel and to see the hand of Isreal in everything that happens to the point where you can't see anything else.
Israel’s actions in the Middle East historically are one of the main reasons terrorists hate the US. Israel’s actions in the Middle East right now are one of the main reasons oil prices are so high.
1
2
17
751
Stephen Pollard retweeted
Here's my @Spectator column, 'What’s really causing anti-Semitism in British schools' spectator.com/article/whats-… Sir David Bell’s report into anti-Semitism in schools (which will be published this afternoon but has been widely trailed) is an important document with a series of worthwhile recommendations. He finds that three in five Jewish students have experienced anti-Semitism – a statistic that should be profoundly shocking but is now entirely unsurprising – and that fewer than half think that there is any point reporting it, given that schools have consistently refused to take serious action when it is reported. In that context, Sir David’s recommendation that schools and colleges should be forced to recognise anti-Semitism as a specific category of harm – as opposed to the general requirement to tackle racism – and to take explicit action to tackle it is eminently sensible. But for all Sir David’s good intentions, his report suffers from the same fundamental flaw as almost all such official analyses of anti-Semitism: his terms of reference did not allow him to examine the causes of the Jew hate he found, only its extent. Which begs so many questions. None of those questions will even be asked by Lucy Powell, the Education Secretary, in her response to the report in the Commons this afternoon, let alone answered. She will doubtless make a big deal of the fact that Labour commissioned the report and will – as all politicians always do – tell MPs that anti-Semitism has no place in schools. It’s the line we always hear whenever there is a major incident – demonstrating in reality that the opposite is true and that there is a very large place for anti-Semitism in Britain today. Any analysis of the growth of anti-Semitism in the years since Israel began its military operation in Gaza in response to the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023 would have to include the words and actions of Labour ministers who have deliberately turned on Israel, in an attempt to appease the sectarian Muslim voters who started to desert Labour in the last general election. Ministers’ rhetoric – such as Ed Miliband speaking last month of Israeli war crimes and ethnic cleansing – has the effect of licensing Jew hate. The government cannot even bring itself to condemn the regular hate marches – sending the message that Jew hate on the streets is entirely legitimate. Add to that the obsession of so many Labour backbenchers with Israel and you have a recipe for the spread of anti-Semitism. Then there is the elephant in the room which few are willing to identify: that much of the problem in schools lies with Muslim children (see this report from Parents Against Anti-Semitism). All too often, this is swept under carpet in fear of accusations of Islamophobia.A typical incident was reported earlier this year, in which two Muslim girls approached a child and stated: ‘We will send our family to behead yours like Jews deserve.’ The incident was reported to the Metropolitan Police but their response was that the girls involved were considered exemplary students and no substantive action would be taken, except talking to them via Police Community Support Officers. Islamophobia and right-wing extremism are often seen as a more significant concern than anti-Semitism. When it comes to having a clear-sighted approach to the issues around anti-Semitism it is difficult to think of a worse possible education secretary than Lucy Powell. Infamously, she claimed that the Manchester Arena suicide bombing which killed 22 people had nothing to do with Islam. Asked on the BBC after the murders, ‘How serious is the problem of Islamist radicalisation in Manchester?’ she replied: ‘I’m not sure that this is the right moment to totally go into that, because I don’t even want to ascribe what has happened to the Islam faith.’ Powell also denied the evidence of links between the bomber, Islamist radicalism and certain mosques, telling the Manchester Evening News: ‘I’m particularly worried about that kind of narrative that somehow there’s areas or hotspots of Manchester that are hotbeds of radicalisation.’ She also, of course, described concern over the rape scandal as a right-wing ‘dog-whistle’. Sir David is to be commended for his report. It is not his fault that it was limited to the extent of school anti-Semitism rather than the causes. But we already know what will happen now, because it always happens. Instead of dealing with the facts of Jew hatred in Britain in 2016, the report’s findings will be attacked with reference to the Gaza war – as if Jewish children at school in Britain are soldiers in the IDF, which itself demonstrates the problem of anti-Semitism.
30
39
8
97
7,201
Stephen Pollard retweeted
Wonder if it's a newbie journalist who's never read the outlet before, or a long-term staffer with a traumatic brain injury that's damaged their memory. Seems the only explanation for the Irish Independent acknowledging the existence of Israeli Arabs and their equal voting rights
1
4
36
1,672
The same old names, so no surprise here. Rooney has decided to support a proscribed terrorist group. What is so difficult to understand here? I’m a writer, but if I publicly announced that I was going to use my (mediocre) royalties to support, say, the IRGC I would rightly expect opprobrium from all right thinking folk.
8
10
174
3,206
I wonder if this chap would be OK with teachers wearing an 'abortion is murder' or a 'Restore' badge. Actually I don't wonder at all.
It's tiring to even say at this point but: Wearing a Palestine badge is not antisemitic
14
9
1
146
2,351
Stephen Pollard retweeted
Rushdie was threatened with murder and nearly stabbed to death for the content of his writing. Rooney has had a source of income cut off because of her declared intent to fund terrorists. These things are very, very unlike each other.
2
41
2
346
6,052
👇
The specific case of Sally Rooney isn't an act of censorship. I am a free speech absolutist. If she wanted to write book called "Why I support Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the IRA" then I'd support her right to do so. Britain should have a First Amendment approach to speech. However, if she wants to give the proceeds of that book to those organisations, then it is right for her publisher to prevent her (and it would probably be criminally liable too.) The open letter is cowardly. They should have the courage to state clearly their view: it should be legal to directly fund organisations that unapologetically break into military base. BTW, I note that none of the signatories of this letter signed the Harper's letter in favour of free speech. Some however attacked it.
1
1
16
1,496
Here's my @Spectator column, 'What’s really causing anti-Semitism in British schools' spectator.com/article/whats-… Sir David Bell’s report into anti-Semitism in schools (which will be published this afternoon but has been widely trailed) is an important document with a series of worthwhile recommendations. He finds that three in five Jewish students have experienced anti-Semitism – a statistic that should be profoundly shocking but is now entirely unsurprising – and that fewer than half think that there is any point reporting it, given that schools have consistently refused to take serious action when it is reported. In that context, Sir David’s recommendation that schools and colleges should be forced to recognise anti-Semitism as a specific category of harm – as opposed to the general requirement to tackle racism – and to take explicit action to tackle it is eminently sensible. But for all Sir David’s good intentions, his report suffers from the same fundamental flaw as almost all such official analyses of anti-Semitism: his terms of reference did not allow him to examine the causes of the Jew hate he found, only its extent. Which begs so many questions. None of those questions will even be asked by Lucy Powell, the Education Secretary, in her response to the report in the Commons this afternoon, let alone answered. She will doubtless make a big deal of the fact that Labour commissioned the report and will – as all politicians always do – tell MPs that anti-Semitism has no place in schools. It’s the line we always hear whenever there is a major incident – demonstrating in reality that the opposite is true and that there is a very large place for anti-Semitism in Britain today. Any analysis of the growth of anti-Semitism in the years since Israel began its military operation in Gaza in response to the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023 would have to include the words and actions of Labour ministers who have deliberately turned on Israel, in an attempt to appease the sectarian Muslim voters who started to desert Labour in the last general election. Ministers’ rhetoric – such as Ed Miliband speaking last month of Israeli war crimes and ethnic cleansing – has the effect of licensing Jew hate. The government cannot even bring itself to condemn the regular hate marches – sending the message that Jew hate on the streets is entirely legitimate. Add to that the obsession of so many Labour backbenchers with Israel and you have a recipe for the spread of anti-Semitism. Then there is the elephant in the room which few are willing to identify: that much of the problem in schools lies with Muslim children (see this report from Parents Against Anti-Semitism). All too often, this is swept under carpet in fear of accusations of Islamophobia.A typical incident was reported earlier this year, in which two Muslim girls approached a child and stated: ‘We will send our family to behead yours like Jews deserve.’ The incident was reported to the Metropolitan Police but their response was that the girls involved were considered exemplary students and no substantive action would be taken, except talking to them via Police Community Support Officers. Islamophobia and right-wing extremism are often seen as a more significant concern than anti-Semitism. When it comes to having a clear-sighted approach to the issues around anti-Semitism it is difficult to think of a worse possible education secretary than Lucy Powell. Infamously, she claimed that the Manchester Arena suicide bombing which killed 22 people had nothing to do with Islam. Asked on the BBC after the murders, ‘How serious is the problem of Islamist radicalisation in Manchester?’ she replied: ‘I’m not sure that this is the right moment to totally go into that, because I don’t even want to ascribe what has happened to the Islam faith.’ Powell also denied the evidence of links between the bomber, Islamist radicalism and certain mosques, telling the Manchester Evening News: ‘I’m particularly worried about that kind of narrative that somehow there’s areas or hotspots of Manchester that are hotbeds of radicalisation.’ She also, of course, described concern over the rape scandal as a right-wing ‘dog-whistle’. Sir David is to be commended for his report. It is not his fault that it was limited to the extent of school anti-Semitism rather than the causes. But we already know what will happen now, because it always happens. Instead of dealing with the facts of Jew hatred in Britain in 2016, the report’s findings will be attacked with reference to the Gaza war – as if Jewish children at school in Britain are soldiers in the IDF, which itself demonstrates the problem of anti-Semitism.
30
39
8
97
7,201
Facts and history = "tropes"
Pulling out all the old tropes now Jake
9
27
177
3,196
Stephen Pollard retweeted
The full exhange from my interview with Abdul El-Sayed on whether Israel is a U.S. ally, how Netanyahu's ouster would change his views and his message to Jewish Democrats on the fence about his candidacy in Michigan's Senate race. @MSNOWNews
NEW: Abdul El-Sayed signaled in an interview he'd question Israel's status as a US ally no matter who wins this month's elections. I asked if his objections are to Netanyahu or the state of Israel. "I think we’ve got to get serious." w/ @peggyhelman01 ms.now/news/abdul-el-sayed-m…
239
207
48
980
313,038
Stephen Pollard retweeted
He said “radical Shia clerics,” not “if Iran didn’t exist.” I know because I watched the clip Mehdi shared. Is he stupid or does he just think everyone else is?
“If Iran didn’t exist” Notice how easy the pro-Israel people, who scream about anyone questioning Israel’s ‘right’ to exist, happily and casually talk about disappearing entire countries - Rubio here on Israel, Trump the other day on Somalia.
56
52
2
705
26,445
Stephen Pollard retweeted
NEW Students are being given instructions on how to exclude Zionists from university societies by describing Zionism as racism in their constitutions Inspired by the Green Party, a pro-Palestine student group at Glasgow Uni gave freshers leaflets which said:
28
34
13
165
16,631
Stephen Pollard retweeted
The chutzpah of the woman married to our Security Advisor Jonathan Powell is jaw-dropping. While her terrorist-supporting tweets are raked over in the national press, she doubles down, presently celebrating the idea of the ‘Palestine poppy’. That is, celebrating a movement which actively attacks UK war memorials now appropriating the Poppy which symbolises the men and women who gave their lives to fight for our freedoms. The same freedoms the people she adores would take from us.
76
244
18
904
47,809
😂🍿😂🍿😂🍿
At this stage, it would be easier to just come clean about pissing away £1.6mn and burning down your own company. Instead, we're getting increasingly fantastic tales to obscure the truth.
2
7
40
2,766
Stephen Pollard retweeted
If you want to understand just how vile they Green Party is, the person who wrote a report whitewashing Labour’s antisemitism under Corbyn (and received a peerage from him to say thanks) reckons they’re antisemitic shithouses.
46
141
5
880
109,279
This you?
I am saddened and shocked by Alice Edward's article published today in the @Telegraph and the extent to which it misrepresents my work and that of the special procedures system she was part of until July 2026. telegraph.co.uk/gift/be34cb6… Collectively, we have been unequivocal: Any sexual harassment and violence committed against women and girls on and since 7 October 2023, including hostages in captivity, are grave crimes. Survivors deserve to be heard, and perpetrators must be held accountable. I have said so before, and the full record of my engagement is here:   ohchr.org/en/press-releases/… ; ohchr.org/en/press-releases/… & ohchr.org/sites/default/file… Ms. Edwards claims that I have never condemned the reports of violence, including sexual violence against women and girls on the 7th of October, and that I have hidden behind Israel’s refusal to grant me entry. Both these claims are incorrect. My statement outlining my engagement on and since the 7th October 2023 makes it clear that I have made several démarches to gain access to primary information, survivors,  witnesses, and first responders. As I told the General Assembly on 8 October 2026, the first time a former hostage approached me was in June 2026 at the Human Rights Council. I have since met her and am handling her case under the established procedure open to every victim; where each step is subject to her full and informed consent. Ms. Edwards also leaves out the fact that when she invited me to join her allegation letter relating to the events of 7th of October 2023, I reviewed it in good faith and made written suggestions on 3rd December 2023. In my feedback, I also asked to see the primary information and testimonies Ms. Edwards had received - a normal request between mandate holders. She declined without explanation, which was the first and only time  I have been denied such a request during my mandate. Contrary to me, she did not invite me to any further engagement on Palestine and Israel after that, nor share any information on any related action she may have taken. Statements such as these only serve the wider efforts to discredit rapporteurs, including rapporteurs that criticize Israel for its serious human rights violations. They serve to dismiss every UN finding of Israeli violations of human rights and international law as being biased against the State of Israel. Ms. Edwards should understand this better than most. Since 2024, she herself was publicly accused of bias against Palestinian victims, and even endured calls for her dismissal. Ms. Edwards knows all too well how stressful it is to have your impartiality questioned. Every one of us is doing our best for victims, whoever they are, and wherever they live. The current President of the Human Rights Council was emphatically clear that mandate holders must be able "to carry out their responsibilities free from personal attacks, intimidation or undue pressure." That included Ms. Edwards when she was a rapporteur but is also expected of her today in her current engagement with rapporteurs (since her resignation as a rapporteur).
63
454
27
6,237
172,975