Classic of https://xitter.cf/t.co/7NpZz35QOd, digital strategist and whatnot.

Ljubljana, Slovenia
Joined April 2007
Announcing our critical philosophy of AI seminars for 2026-2027: ‘Yet Another Machine For Producing Gods’ cpct.uk/2026-2027/ Each week pits a philosophical text and a technical document against each other to interrogate presuppositions and provoke radical reflections.
4
2
13
733
Nuclear weapons, the financial derivatives which caused the 2008 crash, social media, now A.I. Since most legislators struggle to comprehend them, we need to design democratically meaningful forms of oversight. Don’t close those humanities departments just yet. app.prospectmagazine.co.uk/s…
2
28
3
57
7,046
💙 websites websites websites! 💙 @bennavkim and i wrote about putting together www!, the net art exhibition we co-curated with @sofiagarcia_io for @rhizome’s 30th anniversary in nyc. twenty artists, three decades of browser-based art, and about a year spent figuring out how to bring it all into a gallery. we wanted to share some of those conversations: how we chose the works, why we put certain websites on crts and others on ipads, what changed along the way, and how the online and physical shows came together. really grateful to all the artists for being part of this, to @michael_connor for trusting us with it, to @fellowshiptrust for handling the sale, to @artxcode_io ofc, and to everyone who helped us get the show up and running. there were many people involved, and so much work that you couldn't necessarily see in the exhibition itself. thank you ❤️ read here 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 lanpartycuratorial.substack.…
5
20
1
53
1,596
→ History for the Blind (2026) by @supperman 🔗 ljudmila.org/~vuk/Historyfor… A revisit of the timeless classic History of Art for the Blind, updated to new and current preoccupations. The website is making the visible invisible and then audible, hoping to address the blindness of the viewer. Best viewed in a browser on a desktop computer, sorry the unwritten Web Dogma 95 at work.
3
1
6
253
Coxon is being described as a "whistleblower" who left Anthropic. In the very same sense, I'm a "whistleblower" who defected from the TESCREAL movement that *gave rise to the whole ASI race in the first place*. And I'm here to tell you all the secrets: realtimetechpocalypse.com/p/…
13
50
11
186
37,647
vuk cosic retweeted
Since everyone is talking about digital art in Basel, here's my interview series for SLEEK with artists exhibiting at Zero 10 and Kevin McCoy reflecting on what happened to digital art post-NFTs 💭 1️⃣ 0xDEAFBEEF »There Isn’t a Single Canon« 🌐 UBERMORGEN »What’s the Difference Between a Conceptual Hack and Rage Bait?« 💾 Vuk Ćosić »The Internet After Failed Utopias«
🔗 Kevin McCoy »What Happened to NFTs, Kevin McCoy?«
2
14
4
83
3,353
vuk cosic retweeted
Expressed through seven curated chapters, the survey traces the evolution of digital art from early experiments with electronic signals and algorithmic graphics to contemporary AI and blockchain-based practices. View the Catalog: masterpieces.artmeta.org/ Artists include: Ben F. Laposky, Desmond Paul Henry, @HerbertWFranke, Mary Ellen Bute + Ted Nemeth, Aaron Marcus, Alfred Graßl, @CharlesCsuri, Frieder Nake, Gottfried Honegger, Gottfried Jäger, Hein Gravenhorst, Hiroshi Kawano, Joan Truckenbrod, Kenneth C. Knowlton, Leon Harmon, Manfred Mohr, Michael Noll, Otto Beckmann, Robert Mallary, Vera Molnar, Vladimir Bonačić, Waldemar Cordeiro, Analivia Cordeiro, Barbara Nessim, Chiara Boeri, David Em, Larry Cuba, Mark Wilson, Rebecca Allen, William Latham, Yoichiro Kawaguchi, Constant Dullaart, Cornelia Sollfrank, Eduardo Kac, etoy, Jan Robert Leegte, Jodi, Miltos Manetas, @newrafael, @UBERMORGEN_COM, @supperman, Casey @REAS + Ceasuras, @harmvddorpel, Jared S. Tarbell, John Maeda, @kimasendorf, Larva Labs, Manoloide, @TaborRobak, Anna Ridler, @BottoDAO, David Young, @elmanmansimov, @genekogan, George Legrady, Harold Cohen, Hervé Graumann, @hollyherndon , Katie Hofstadter, @quasimondo, @matdryhurst, @memoakten, @nancybursonart, @sashastiles, Tom White, Trevor Paglen, Alejandro Hurtado, @PowerDada/@dadacreeps, @Hackatao, @kennyschac, Martin Lukas Ostachowski, Mitchell F. Chan, @rheaplex , Sarah Friend, terra0, @XCOPYART
1
6
1
41
5,966
RT @postanika: right click news: @alexestorick invited me to share a few words about »inferior« image by shl0ms »what interests me is that…
3
62
vuk cosic retweeted
Vuk Ćosić: "Political satire, hoaxes, pranks, and all kinds of provocations were... the overture for us to implicitly realize that critical media art is what we were striving for. And that is the difference between... early net.art and later digital art..." Digital Masterpieces: From Code to Canon, debuting at @ArtBasel's Zero 10, Basel (June 16 – 21, 2026). Above quote from Anika Meier, in conversation with Vuk Ćosić for SLEEK, May 21 2026.
In conversation with Vuk Ćosić (@supperman) for SLEEK The Internet After Failed Utopias AM What are your thoughts when you hear a new generation of artists saying, »We’re going to democratize the art world. We don’t need gatekeepers. We don’t need institutions«? VC It’s a little sad because I literally recognize sentences from our manifestos or posts written in the middle of the night, and I see them again today, as if we were speaking about the same utopian possibilities. I don’t buy it. That rhetoric was abused by network speculation, especially by NFT people. The rhetoric of liberation, zero gatekeepers, or disintermediation was captured by the crypto crowd because they have a use for an active, participating audience of creators. NFT artists are slightly trapped by that rhetoric. It’s not their text. It’s the text of the Bitcoin people, or blockchain people in general. But if there are kids out there who believe in it, and they generate work while believing in it and trying to make it happen, then it may be good. Maybe it’s like a useful psychosis.
1
7
33
1,745
vuk cosic retweeted
Vuk Ćosić is credited with having coined the term net.art. Well, apparently that was a hoax, Vuk Ćosić claimed when we spoke. »We happened to like practical humor, pranks, and hoaxes, so in a sense, it rhymed with our attitude. That was a hoax piece by Alexei Shulgin on our mailing list, nettime, and he invented a story that I had received an email that was totally garbled, and in it, I saw some stuff that looked useful. Pit Schultz suggested this name, and we loved it because it made dot art like dot doc, you know, like a file extension, like a Word file. And we said, ›Oh, this is cute,‹ and we liked it, and we accepted it, let’s say, as the label.« – Vuk Ćosić (@supperman)
In conversation with Vuk Ćosić (@supperman) for SLEEK The Internet After Failed Utopias AM What are your thoughts when you hear a new generation of artists saying, »We’re going to democratize the art world. We don’t need gatekeepers. We don’t need institutions«? VC It’s a little sad because I literally recognize sentences from our manifestos or posts written in the middle of the night, and I see them again today, as if we were speaking about the same utopian possibilities. I don’t buy it. That rhetoric was abused by network speculation, especially by NFT people. The rhetoric of liberation, zero gatekeepers, or disintermediation was captured by the crypto crowd because they have a use for an active, participating audience of creators. NFT artists are slightly trapped by that rhetoric. It’s not their text. It’s the text of the Bitcoin people, or blockchain people in general. But if there are kids out there who believe in it, and they generate work while believing in it and trying to make it happen, then it may be good. Maybe it’s like a useful psychosis.
2
6
1
26
3,242
vuk cosic retweeted
Platforming Vuk Ćosić (@supperman) next after @SHL0MS. Vuk was the inevitable next person in that lineage. (He’ll be part of Zero 10 by Art Basel through the Digital Masterpieces booth.) AM: Your utopia as artists was that you did not need to rely on institutions and curators.
 VC: This is by now part of the vernacular. We knew we didn’t need to talk to people like you. Educated people, terrible. We all had pre-net.art histories in confrontational art practices. When you are this hyped-up person with a Molotov in one hand and a spray can in the other, writing graffiti, you are completely self-sufficient.
3
7
1
56
3,074
vuk cosic retweeted
1/ Alexander Karp wrote his PhD under Habermas on how philosophical jargon becomes a weapon: elevated language that creates insiders, scapegoats outsiders, and rebrands domination as “authenticity.” Habermas rejected it. He had already read the manual. 2/ Karp and Kaczynski share the exact same diagnosis: tech society breeds alienation, therapeutic softness, fake elites, and crowning achievements that are also cages. Kaczynski’s answer: burn it down. Karp’s answer: arm it - and invoice the Pentagon monthly. This isn’t a rebuttal of the Unabomber. It’s the Unabomber with a government SLA and a $100 billion valuation. 3/ Silicon Valley “owes America a moral debt”? The internet was built by DARPA, public universities, and collective labor - then enclosed and sold back as rent. Palantir was seeded by the CIA, sustained by Pentagon contracts, and incorporated in Delaware to dodge taxes. The debt runs the other way. What Karp calls “patriotism” is feudal tribute dressed in Critical Theory drag. 4/ “Hard power in this century will be built on software.” Horkheimer and Adorno - Karp’s own tradition - called this instrumental reason: morality stripped out, rationality reduced to pure efficiency. They wrote it as a warning. Karp read it as a roadmap. He didn’t abandon Critical Theory. He completed it in the worst possible direction. 5/ “The question is not whether AI weapons will be built - it’s who builds them.” Oldest trick in the book: declare inevitability, kill debate, demand applause for your version. Kaczynski used the same logic to justify bombs. Arendt called this the precondition for totalitarianism. Karp calls it strategy. 6/ “America has delivered an extraordinarily long peace.” True - if you only count great-power corpses. The rest of the planet got Korea, Vietnam, Guatemala, Chile, Iraq, Libya, Yemen. Conflicts where the exact surveillance Palantir now sells decided who lived. Karp’s peace isn’t peace. It’s empire with better accounting. 7/ “No country advanced progressive values more than America.” The same country that did the Marshall Plan did Guantánamo. Landed on the moon and redlined its cities. Wrote the Universal Declaration and ran COINTELPRO - now serviced by Palantir. These aren’t contradictions. They’re the actual content. Karp turns monuments into blank checks. 8/ Decadence. Softness. Weak elites. The urgent need for hardness and sovereign decision. This isn’t Frankfurt School. This is Carl Schmitt wearing Habermasian drag: permanent exception, executive will over deliberation, violence as restoration of order. His committee noticed. Karp took notes and switched sides. 9/ Karp now decries the “psychologization of politics.” Meanwhile Palantir’s entire product is the psychologization of populations at industrial scale: risk scores, behavioral predictions, pre-crime social graphs sold to governments. He demands “grace for public figures.” Their complexity deserves forbearance. The rest of us get location data, zero due process, and an algorithm that never forgives. Mercy for the masters. Metadata for the masses. 10/ This is the real product. Not a betrayal of Critical Theory - its simulation. Karp kept the form (ideology critique, language as violence, demand for authenticity) while flipping every conclusion. Emancipation becomes domination. Critique becomes product. Reflection becomes targeting solution. The culture industry doesn’t suppress radical thought. It packages it and sells it back as proof the machine is self-aware. 11/ The company is named after Tolkien’s seeing-stones. They showed truth - but Sauron controlled the network, and those who looked too long saw only what he chose. "The Technological Republic" already exists. It’s the company that published the manifesto. And what it shows us is a world with no alternative to looking - and no one left to ask if the stone corrupts.
Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com
1
14
2
40
5,794
MEDIA UNDER DYSTOPIA 6.0 — Looking at Models Presented by: MUD Foundation Exhibition Dates: December 2–6, 2025 Opening Event: December 2 at 6 PM (Miami local time) Curated by: Charlotte Kent @Lucy2Scribbles Work on view: Algorhythm of Narcissus Exhibition Details: verse.mud.foundation/xr-crea… Alongside with incredible artists: @BorisEldagsen @carlagannis @fabiolalariosm @jamesbridle @mayaonthenet @MichaelMandiberg @supperman This hybrid exhibition examines the evolving relationship between bodies, models, and technological systems. The program blends media art, XR, and digital interfaces, and my video work Algorhythm of Narcissus will be included as part of the presentation.
1
3
6
724
We are excited to announce our acquisition of the historic net-art piece, Deep ASCII by Vuk Ćosić (@supperman). Let’s explore the history of the piece and the artist behind it. A 🧵...
13
35
8
182
22,226
5 Decades of digital art history on @YouTube 📺 📺: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL… 🎙️ Joan Truckenbrod | @hansdehlinger | @postanika | Mark Wilson⁠ | @coppergiloth | ⁠Dan Sandin⁠ | ⁠@davidemartist | ⁠@WilliamLatham1 | ⁠Stephen Todd⁠ | @DarcyGerbarg | @microartsgroup | @auriea | @JoshuaDavis | @liasomething | @supperman | @scott_draves | @REAS | @ChristianePaul2 | @golan | Christa Sommerer | @tylerxhobbs | @rheaplex | @NeuralBricolage | @genekogan
3
14
2
37
4,010
I've waited decades for net art to get the recognition it warrants—so it's only fitting it came for the artists who refused to show a canned website in the 2000 Whitney Biennial. Here's to NYT Critic's Pick @auriea + helpers @ReginaHarsanyi @despens. Somewhere Mirapaul is smiling
2
8
51
2,724
"Pioneering Digital Expression in the '90s" 🌐🎬 Firsthand art history with the net, early-AI and Flash artists who made it 🔊🆙 🎙️ @auriea | @JoshuaDavis | @scott_draves | @liasomething | @supperman ➕ @monkantony_tez | @DlSPUTED | @thefunnyguysNFT
3
13
7
61
15,297
"The memoir of a net.art memoir!" by @supperman with @monkantony_tez "...There was art that needed to be done in order to deal with the internet." -Vuk Ćosić 🌐👇 lerandom.art/editorial/the-m…
1
2
5
731
Next week 🎧🕰️📅 We discuss the impactful '90s with the artists who were there 🔻 🔲 @auriea Harvey 🔲 @JoshuaDavis 🔲 @scott_draves 🔲 Vuk Ćosić @supperman 🔲 @liasomething
1
3
11
1,438