
Immigration Lawyer #BetterCallKMan ⚖️ Pokemon & Crypto Investor 📈
Joined February 2012
- Tweets9.4K
- Following4.1K
- Followers3.1K
- Likes20.8K
Check out what I'm selling on Fanatics Collect! fanaticscollect.com/vault-ma…
Thanks for wasting everyone’s time & money!
I’m selling my PFP
Shame on you @AbstractChain @LucaNetz @0xCygaar
K Man retweeted
Jack Butcher Balance Token Explanation 🏦
Got some new folks trickling in confused on how the eco works on the epic @jackbutcher news so sharing a simplified guide here:
1. Every Credit NFT has a credit score(how rare it is). Can check below by entering wallet address.
opensea.io/collection/credit…
jack.art/credits/rating
2. You can combine 80 credit NFTs to form a statement-which combines all credit scores into one total score.
opensea.io/collection/statem…
jack.art/credits/assemble
Ex. if 250 each credit, becomes 20k total credit score for that statement
3. You can convert your statement's total credit score into the balance tokens.
You also receive a non-transferrable NFT that displays how much balance tokens you have in that wallet.
Ex. redeem 20k total credit score statement ->20k balance tokens + non-transferrable NFT in that wallet
Let me know if any other questions!
credits is an artwork about belief
each credit was created from a private payment - an $8 transaction on x money
each transaction id, originally visible only to sender and recipient, was converted to a sha-256 hash to create an artwork made of four 8x8 printing plates in cmyk (cyan, magenta, yellow and black)
the transaction id and settlement timestamp became public source data for the onchain artwork
the x money transaction settlement time (in seconds) determined which plates print - there are 15 different possible combinations of cmyk, so this process repeats 4 x per minute
if the original transaction id contained an 8, the resulting artwork metadata keeps track of each
the rarity calculation considers the color combination, the number of active pixels, the space they occupy after the plates shift, the number of 8s in the transaction id, and the registration of the plates
these qualities are measured against the completed collection and translated into a credit rating between 80 and 800
the rating measures those traits - it cannot account for every reason someone might value an image
the rating is fixed - the price is whatever someone is willing to pay
80 credits can be burned to create a statement
the collector chooses which credits to use and how to arrange them - their individual ratings are added together, and their colors become the material of the new artwork
a statement can take different visual forms without changing its rating
statements can also be overprinted - one is burned into another, combining their ink, ratings and histories
balance is the proposed next form
under this design, a statement can be permanently surrendered for its rating in divisible erc-20 tokens - one point becomes one balance
the statement is locked rather than destroyed - its artwork and history remain, but it can no longer be transferred
its quantity and color composition can move independently
each receiving wallet gets one non-transferable erc-721 artwork
the artwork stays with the wallet and reads its current balance of the transferable erc-20 token
the tokens move - the artwork updates
if the wallet holds nothing, the artwork remains and displays zero
when balances meet, their colors mix in proportion to the amounts received - when they split, each part carries a share of that mixture
the colors preserve an aggregate ancestry, not a traceable list of individual credits or statements
exchange custody can mix them further - a buyer may receive the exchange’s mixture rather than the particular colors a seller deposited
someone who never owned a credit or a statement can inherit their colors
credits, statements and balances can exist at the same time
some people keep the individual marks, some compose them into pages, and some surrender the page for something they can divide and exchange
others may simply prefer the balance artwork
composition reduces the number of surviving credits, overprinting reduces the number of surviving statements, and surrender moves statements out of circulation while releasing their accumulated rating as balance
the appetite for liquidity becomes one of the forces shaping all three collections
but making something divisible does not mean someone will want to buy it - actual liquidity still requires buyers and funded markets
balance offers divisibility, not a promise of demand
the market becomes a medium - its activity changes the distribution of the work, and when trading stops, that distribution remains
the price can disappear, the artwork cannot
genuinely baffling to see $STONK at these prices
making 3x the revenue of Pons which is 2x higher mcap, not to mention the amount of protocols ranging between 400m-1b doing less than 50k in revenue being 5x the market cap of stonk
this is either highly misspriced and it sends higher or im retarded
fyi: i like pons and think this is also a good long term play like i’ve said many many times when it was barely at 20m mcap, that being said numbers on stonk are better and should make stonk somewhat similar valuation to pons or higher
we will see
Just created my first Statement (#108)!
I arranged the Credits into an X, since this all started with @XMoney
Thank you @jackbutcher for this cool concept, I had a lot of fun designing it!
K Man retweeted
StonkFun Revenue
(September 30th)
Revenue: $980,097
Buybacks: $587,209
Burned: 2.3M $STONK
stonkfun.xyz/revenue
K Man retweeted
17% of the total solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx supply has now been burned.
solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx is still in its first inning & has an incredible runway this cycle
September 6th was the first time Stonk crossed $1M in daily revenue.
Which was literally 2 weeks ago...
Since then, the numbers have only gotten more consistent and majority of mindshare has been captured by Stonk pairings.
- 16.78% supply burnt forever, ~$50M at current mcap ($250m)
- $18M+ in total revenue
- $10.75M in total buybacks
- $2.67B in total trading volume
Stonk has already flipped Pons in daily protocol revenue and has even flipped Pump on individual revenue days.
What makes this even more interesting is how value flows back into the ecosystem (this is where Stonk completely outshines Pumpfun).
Pump had over 2 years to build its liquidity, distribution and dominance on Solana, while holders spent years waiting on airdrops and incentives that never materialized into anything for their holders.
Stonk's model is much simpler.
The value is already flowing back onchain.
Revenue buys solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx. Stonk gets burned. Supply gets permanently reduced.
And IMO the bigger unlock is that this value accrual isn't limited to Stonk itself.
Any token can pair with solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx, allowing ecosystem tokens to tap into the same flywheel while creating more demand for Stonk.
More pairs create more volume, more revenue and ultimately more buybacks.
@LaunchOnSF will continue to capture more mindshare and will be the leading launchpad on Solana.
K Man retweeted
StonkFun Revenue
(Sept 19th)
Revenue: $1,247,924
Buybacks: $749,636
Burned: 2.93M solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx
stonkfun.xyz/revenue
K Man retweeted
StonkFun Revenue
(Sept 11th)
Revenue: $2,205,092
Buybacks: $1,269,778
Burned: 5.27M
stonkfun.xyz/revenue






















