ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow) profile picture
Joined May 2025
Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)Photo by ColdestCrow (@thecoldestcrow)
Not buying it. Shapiro is winning this race by a MINIMUM of 12 points.
PENNSYLVANIA POLL - Governor 🟦 Josh Shapiro (inc): 50% 🟥 Stacy Garrity: 43% @NatPubAffairs | 7/26-30 | 600 LV backend.natpublicaffairs.com…
1
120
Kamala is only at the botton because of 2024 when in reality, ALL of these candidates would have lost in 2024. Ossoff and Shapiro are the most electable, Kamala and Pete in the middle, Newsom and AOC toward the bottom.
New - Electability Index - Democratic Primary Odds of winning general election, if they win primary: 🔵 Jon Ossoff: 75% 🔵 Gavin Newsom: 65% 🔵 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 59% 🔵 Pete Buttigieg: 54% 🔵 Josh Shapiro: 53% 🔵 Kamala Harris: 47% ElectabilityIndex.com
1
80
New - Electability Index - Democratic Primary Odds of winning general election, if they win primary: 🔵 Jon Ossoff: 75% 🔵 Gavin Newsom: 65% 🔵 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 59% 🔵 Pete Buttigieg: 54% 🔵 Josh Shapiro: 53% 🔵 Kamala Harris: 47% ElectabilityIndex.com
268
256
146
2,896
2,254,068
"They never do this for insiders." Yes, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are famous for never being criticized by media outlets.
This is what I know for sure about Platner - every legacy media outlet is trying their hardest to make sure he loses. They are investigating every minute and every facet of his life. They never do this for insiders. They despise outsiders who challenge power. The minute a candidate says he's not going to listen to the donors, especially AIPAC, he is set upon 24/7 by people posing as reporters. They are the attack dogs of the wealthy and powerful people who run this country - and they hate it when their orders are not follwoed. So, no, I don't believe any mainstream media story. I think they are agents of propganda and not real news. And to my knowledge, they haven't investigated a single component of Susan Collins very long and very corrupt life. Because that's precisely the type of corruption that national media loves and wants you to think is normal.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The sexual assault allegation against Platner is corroborated by messages between the accuser and her therapist and friends years before Platner's run for office. The Nazi tattoo was done in 2007, almost 2 decades before running for office. politico.com/news/2026/07/0… zeteo.com/p/graham-platn… fortune.com/2025/10/23/gra…
66
These are the same people screeching at the Democratic party to "earn their votes" btw.
I criticized Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei a thousand times. He was oppressing his own people and preventing democracy. But there’s one thing you can’t take away from him, he died on his own two feet, instead of kneeling to Israel. That took courage. He didn’t bow.
76
This. The more time you spend talking about things like affordability, the economy, or healthcare, the less the trans stuff works. Look at Virginia's gubernatorial race in 2025.
This isn’t how I would’ve said it, but he’s got a point: Americans are sick of discourse about trans people. But right now, the people talking about us the most are Republicans. Dems can win voters by just not talking about us. They don’t need to throw us under the bus.
1
181
The K-Hive on here is starting to become JUST as insufferable as the Bernie or bust leftists. Absolute crybabies.
1
37
ColdestCrow retweeted
There is nothing wrong with trying to move Democrats in a different direction on policy. It’s a problem when that goal takes priority over beating republicans. “I’ll only vote Democrat if it’s my preferred candidate” is not the rhetoric of somebody who understands this fight.
60
160
9
1,393
29,375
There are so many people on this app who are either arguing in bad faith about James Talarico or do not understand what it takes for Democrats to win in Texas.
50
I’m so sick of this. This is the world’s richest man and one of the most famous people on the world The post he’s complaining about has zero likes and zero retweets. How did a right-wing influencer even find it before anyone else? Now the Elon tweet has 13 million views. Musk is a cancer on the public discourse. It’s difficult to imagine a person with more reckless disregard for the truth. How can anyone calm things down with this movement? 100% of Democrats condemn the Kirk killing. Still, they’ll find a post with zero likes and zero retweets, which a right winger maybe posted for all we know, declare war on half the country, and get tens of millions of views for it. There’s no hope of anything better with Elon poisoning public discourse along with the right-wing influencer space he’s plugged into.
316
725
64
7,003
354,520
I hate Mike Lee
I swear you can just tweet “I hate Mike Lee” and get 1,000 likes instantly
1
43
Politics 101: If you're explaining, you're losing.
Look, I'm seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue: First, POTUS has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Over the last few months, he encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians to accomplish this goal. The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways--the easy way or the "other" way. Second, I've seen a lot of confusion over the issue of "civilian nuclear power" and "uranium enrichment." These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that. Meanwhile, they've enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They've been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization. It's one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It's another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it's still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium. I have yet to see a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use. I've yet to see a single good argument for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations. I've yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA's findings. Meanwhile, the president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens. He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.
47