Your paper sucks

Joined October 2015
This paper is more appropriate for a speciality journal. Like, one that specializes in terrible papers.
8
202
23
785
i've been saying this for a while now
that was not a good paper
8
2,027
Reviewer Number 3 retweeted
body dysmorphia but for the body of my paper
1
27
2
221
8,797
it’s not impostor syndrome your work is actually bad
1
1
1
34
3,011
submitting your paper to nature, only to have it desk rejected immediately xitter.cf/JebraFaushay/status/18…
1
2
15
4,203
the personal insults i hurled at you in my review were actually “official actions” taken as a reviewer and so you are not allowed to complain about them, sorry i don’t make the rules here
1
4
21
4,389
also your paper was terrible
1
1,512
each @hubermanlab paper has only a 20% chance of being accepted by me, but he submits them 6 times so I have no choice by the end
12
3,946
Does tweeting increase citations? We conducted an experiment with 110 tweeted papers and 440 controls, waited 3 years for citations to accumulate... and found no significant increase in citations journals.plos.org/plosone/ar…
1
3
39
7,317
your paper after incorporating my feedback
3
17
1
88
15,993
the review process
The door to academic success
5
45
11,629
when you realize it’s me reviewing your paper xitter.cf/HumansNoContext/status…
1
2
19
5,796
When the editor does nothing as I trash your paper
1
34
6,853
when Reviewer 1’s comments are just as fierce as mine
3
1
33
11,585
using this in my next review
Replying to @mealreplacer
you are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out
1
9
67
14,132
your paper after the revisions I requested
10
236
47
2,016
289,572
turning the review process into a discussion of my completely irrelevant work (world cup edition)
3
34
8,201