Tim Lang (@tlang_BC) profile picture

Lucky Husband, Proud Dad, and serial propagator of bad puns and dad jokes! Opinions are my own.

Vancouver, BC
Joined February 2009
Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)Photo by Tim Lang (@tlang_BC)
Tim Lang retweeted
I can't even signal my 4 month old printer that's literally beside me.
BREAKING: 49 year old Voyager 1 signals Earth again after a 2-day outage
30
241
8
6,536
79,316
Buckingham Palace Honours Sir Patrick Stewart (1940–2026) with Star Trek Theme Tune 🕊️ The Band of the Grenadier Guards performs the iconic Star Trek theme at Buckingham Palace in honour of Sir Patrick Stewart, following the sad news of his passing. Queen Elizabeth II knighted Sir Patrick Stewart in 2010, recognising his outstanding contribution to drama and the arts 🇬🇧 🎥 @KingsGuardTours 📆 30 October 2026 📍 Buckingham Palace #SirPatrickStewart #StarTrek #GrenadierGuards #BuckinghamPalace #BritishArmyMusic
510
5,579
540
25,259
983,524
RIP
100
1,372
43
10,902
130,247
SIR PATRICK STEWART (1940-2026) Before everything else, Patrick was defined by being born and bred in Yorkshire, the proud county in the north of England which he loved to the end. You could hear it in his accented voice and in the stern honesty with which he told you what he thought and felt. Yorkshiremen have no truck with half-truths or avoidance of big issues. He wore his heart on his sleeve, which made him a man to rely on, to admire and in my case, love. We first met as ambitious young actors with the Royal Shakespeare Company half a century ago but we weren’t in the same productions. My first strong memory was a few years later, meeting him in the street in central London when he told me about an offer to take over a leading part in 'Star Trek'. “But Patrick think of your stage career in the UK. Do you really want to risk—getting lost in Hollywood for years and years?”. Well, he took the risk and thank goodness for us all that he did for not just his devoted Trekkies but film and theatre audiences, who marvelled at his using international celebrity to star in a string of cinema successes ('X-Men' of course) and in great classical plays by Shakespeare, Ibsen, Arthur Miller, Peter Shaffer, Pinter and Beckett at Stratford-upon-Avon, in London’s West End and on Broadway. America was his adopted home, where he met his adored Sunny who has cared for him through sickness and health, through thick and thin. But he never forsook his origins: and the proudest achievement of the most respected and beloved actor of his generation on either side of the Atlantic, was his appointment as Chancellor of Huddersfield University in Yorkshire. His farewell performance in 'Avengers: Doomsday' is yet to be seen. Ian McKellen 29 October 2026 Photo: University of Huddersfield
3,367
91,999
4,324
474,807
6,840,214
Tim Lang retweeted
BREAKING: Patrick Stewart, the beloved actor best known for his iconic roles as Jean-Luc Picard in ‘Star Trek’ and Professor X in ‘X-Men’, dies at 86. nbcnews.to/4swhqWR
183
989
324
4,003
299,986
Tim Lang retweeted
Patrick Stewart, an actor known for his roles in "Star Trek" and the "X-Men" film franchise, has died at the age of 86, his family announced Thursday. abcnews.visitlink.me/QeN9ea
357
1,967
545
8,065
488,667
#RIP, Captain.
4
17
393
Go f*cking vote today, BC. 🗳️
1
8
32
883
🎯🎯🎯
Thoughts From The Campaign Trail! As we look at election results from across the province, there is no doubt that voters have sent a message. I know there will be plenty of commentators offering their interpretations of what that message is. I wanted to share a few thoughts about what I believe voters are trying to tell us. People are looking for competence from their government, not ideology. Politics can sometimes attract people who are more motivated by a desire to reshape society in their own image than by the practical responsibilities of governing. But I don’t believe that’s where most voters are. First and foremost, people want government to do its job. They want it to deliver the basic services we all depend on, and to deliver them well. At the municipal level, that means good recreation centres, clean parks, potholes filled, snow removed, safe neighbourhoods and responsible management of property taxes. Getting the basics right has been my mantra since the day I walked into City Hall. And I believe the people of Port Coquitlam have responded to that approach. Second, people want results they can actually see and feel. That means being upfront, honest and realistic about what we can accomplish. Increasingly, I see politicians making grandiose promises designed to capture attention and win votes, even when those promises are completely detached from reality. And when those promises inevitably go unfulfilled, the damage goes well beyond the politician who made them. It erodes people’s trust and confidence in government itself. That’s one of the reasons I place so much importance on delivering core public services exceptionally well. It doesn’t mean government shouldn’t be ambitious. Quite the opposite. We should have big aspirations for our communities and our province. We should want to tackle difficult problems and make life better for people. But we also have to be honest about what is possible, realistic about what it takes, and accountable for what we promise. When government consistently gets the small things right, it earns the trust and confidence necessary to take on the bigger challenges. Finally, I think people are looking for a return to some normalcy in our politics. I think people are exhausted by politics built around division, hostility and the demonization of anyone who happens to see the world differently. I can’t think of many other parts of our lives where we would consider that acceptable behaviour. When I’m at the rink or the field watching my two boys, I talk with other parents who have all kinds of different opinions and perspectives. We don’t necessarily agree about politics or everything happening in the world. But I can tell you one thing we do agree on. We all want our kids to be happy, healthy and have the best possible shot at a good life. And I think that says something important about who we really are. I don’t believe the public is nearly as divided as some politicians would have us believe. I don’t believe we’re locked in some do-or-die struggle where one side has all the answers and everyone on the other side is beyond redemption. That’s not how we behave in our families. It’s not how we behave at work. It’s not how we behave on teams. And it’s not how we should behave in our politics. We can disagree without being enemies. We can have different beliefs without questioning one another’s character. And we can recognize that, despite our differences, most of us want many of the same things for ourselves, our families and our communities. I believe there’s far more that brings us together than pulls us apart. And I believe government works best when it focuses on those things we have in common, earns the public’s trust through actions and results (usually smaller, incremental ones), and stays firmly planted where the vast majority of normal people are.
1
100
B.C.’s premier, @Dave_eby wants British Columbians to believe his proposed income tax increases are about making millionaires pay more. There’s just one rather significant problem: the increases start at approximately $190,000, not $1 million. That’s the subject of my weekly @financialpost column, published today, in which I examine Eby’s proposed tax increases, the economic consequences and why I believe this is exactly the wrong direction for British Columbia and Canada. Under the B.C. NDP’s plan, the combined federal/provincial marginal income tax rate would rise to 55.5% on income above approximately $266,000 and reach an astonishing 57.5% on income over $1 million. His rationale was familiar: it's right to ask people who earn a little more to "pitch in” - such a tired and vacuous speaking point. If implemented, B.C. would have the highest top marginal income tax rate in Canada and a rate higher than every European country except Denmark. And Denmark is considering eliminating the surtax that puts it ahead of B.C. Growing up in Fort McMurray, I realized early the value of hard work. I delivered newspapers, shovelled sidewalks during brutally cold winters and sold Regal Christmas cards door to door to earn spending money. Imagine if my parents had told me that once I earned a certain amount, they would take 57.5% of every additional dollar I earned. It was a new “family tax,” explaining that during these tough times, they needed me to “pitch in” a little more. Would I have worked harder? Of course not. And that's precisely the problem with punitive marginal income tax rates. In 1966, Canada’s Royal Commission on Taxation recognized this basic reality and recommended that the highest marginal income tax rate should not exceed 50%, noting the psychological barrier created when governments take more than half of the rewards from additional effort, saving and investment. Almost 60 years later, that wisdom seems lost on B.C.’s premier and the plan’s cheerleaders. And let’s not pretend this is simply about wealthy people being asked to contribute “a little more”. These increases affect professionals, entrepreneurs and business owners who take risks, create jobs and have choices about where to live and invest. Meanwhile, B.C.’s spending has more than doubled from $48.7 billion in 2016-17 to approximately $100 billion this year, with a projected $13.8-billion deficit. British Columbians aren’t undertaxed. Their government overspends. Eby’s answer? Raise taxes even further on the very people the province should be working hard to attract and retain. In my column, I also examine the lessons from previous tax increases and why higher marginal rates don't necessarily translate into higher government revenues. The Laffer Curve is instructive here: at some point, increasing tax rates can actually reduce the revenue governments collect. Incentives don't stop at the Rockies. A frostbitten kid with a paper route in Fort McMurray, AB could tell him what he'll actually get: a lot less. financialpost.com/personal-f…
7
58
4
153
3,694
Nanaimo’s most prolific offender is back on the street. Released Thursday on time served. 274 convictions, 81 of them violent. This is the same person who threw a brick at a pregnant woman downtown in 2022. I have two daughters. I know what parents in Nanaimo are thinking this week. And I hear stories like this all across our province. Repeat violent offenders released again and again, only to create more victims. Williams Lake, Kamloops, Prince George, Surrey. Same story, different town. The court heard this person told a probation officer about wanting to go back to jail the day before the latest incident. Someone that unwell asks to go back inside, and the answer is a probation order and a list of streets to stay off. Right now in BC it’s a jail cell or the sidewalk and nothing in between. David Eby and the NDP came to Nanaimo in 2023 and announced a special program for repeat violent offenders. This offender was in it. Last December David Eby and the NDP said it was working. A Conservative government will amend the Mental Health Act so police can get people like this into mandatory treatment, build the psychiatric and treatment beds so there is somewhere for them to go, hire 250 more police and 500 more RCMP officers for rural and regional communities, add 50 Crown prosecutors and work with Ottawa to fund 20 more judges, and publish the numbers on repeat offenders every year so you can see for yourself whether it’s working. Nanaimo has waited long enough. So has the rest of BC. Strong leadership for serious times. cheknews.ca/nanaimos-most-pr…
125
339
38
1,498
55,876
Tim Lang retweeted
NEW - @LDoerkson promises to scrap PST on capital equipment for businesses like machinery, appoint a new Minister for Red Tape Reduction (this has existed before) to cut red tape back to 2017 levels with law that eliminates 2 regulations for every new one introduced.
28
51
12
394
14,346
Spoke to an old friend in Vancouver who is an internal medicine physician. He said if the NDP planned tax increase goes ahead, he's leaving. He's already been in touch with a clinic in Washington State which would love to have him. Even just the threat of higher taxes is forcing BC doctors to rethink their place in BC. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
BC has 2 Pediatric cardiac surgeons for the entire province. "They work their asses off. You loose 1 or can’t replace one at retirement and we are in a lot of hurt. Getting votes by demonizing hard working people has lost any remaining support I held for some of the NDP policies." - Dr. Kevin Mcleod, Internal Medicine Specialist for the North Shore of Vancouver and Whitehorse.
79
123
14
668
29,218
BC has 2 Pediatric cardiac surgeons for the entire province. "They work their asses off. You loose 1 or can’t replace one at retirement and we are in a lot of hurt. Getting votes by demonizing hard working people has lost any remaining support I held for some of the NDP policies." - Dr. Kevin Mcleod, Internal Medicine Specialist for the North Shore of Vancouver and Whitehorse.
BC NDP proposed provincial income tax increases are NOT a so called millionaires tax. The 2% increase starts at $190,405 to $265,545 - upping the rate from 16.8% to 18.8%. On Income from $265,545 to $1 million the rate increases from 20.5% to 22.5%. Income above $1 million: A new top tax bracket would be introduced at 24.5% - Pushing the top marginal provincial/federal rate to 57.5% on income over $1 million - the highest in North America.
34
170
10
818
46,212
I get the $1m+ but the $190-$265k that's your GP, your lawyer, those are not millionaire salaries, that's what you need to buy an house in #vancouver. ffs #bcpoli
NEW - @Dave_Eby proposes to raise income taxes on top two brackets by 2 percentage points, to generate $1b in extra revenue for BC. • $190,405-$265,545 will go from 16.8% to 18.8% • $265,545-$1m will go from 20.5% to 22.5% • New $1m+ tax at 24.5%
41
12
4
147
12,635
This will have such a negative impact on being able to recruit entrepreneurs and top talent to BC. You can’t recruit sub specialist physicians with a 57.5% income tax rate without then turning around and paying them more tax dollars. This is such a nutso plan.
NEW - @Dave_Eby proposes to raise income taxes on top two brackets by 2 percentage points, to generate $1b in extra revenue for BC. • $190,405-$265,545 will go from 16.8% to 18.8% • $265,545-$1m will go from 20.5% to 22.5% • New $1m+ tax at 24.5%
66
80
14
480
33,828
Context: This would raise BC to the highest income tax rate since 1981, and make the province (by a decent margin) the highest tax rate jurisdiction in Canada. The gap with Alberta would be back at 1990s levels. Data: financesofthenation.ca/statu…
NEW - @Dave_Eby proposes to raise income taxes on top two brackets by 2 percentage points, to generate $1b in extra revenue for BC. • $190,405-$265,545 will go from 16.8% to 18.8% • $265,545-$1m will go from 20.5% to 22.5% • New $1m+ tax at 24.5%
59
161
48
478
76,514
If this is brought in, it will mean someone earning $300,000 would pay $10,000 less in taxes in Alberta. Yeah, a lot of people are going to start looking east and bringing their capital with them.
NEW - @Dave_Eby proposes to raise income taxes on top two brackets by 2 percentage points, to generate $1b in extra revenue for BC. • $190,405-$265,545 will go from 16.8% to 18.8% • $265,545-$1m will go from 20.5% to 22.5% • New $1m+ tax at 24.5%
20
3
3
94
14,534
Tim Lang retweeted
David Eby is not only an opportunist but he's also fundamentally dishonest. Calling a tax on everyone making over $190k a year a "millionaires" tax is a flat out marketing lie. It is more honest to call Ebys latest tax increase should be called a "doctors tax" because that is who will pay it. Desperate. Opportunistic. Chaotic. They need to go.
13
43
2
226
4,218