
Neonatologist @UVANICU and Father of 4! Interested in baseball, quality improvement, and neonatal gut disease...tweets my own; RT is not endorsement
Virginia
Joined August 2009
- Tweets1.5K
- Following1.4K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes3.7K
Pinned Tweet
Can I put this up all over the @UVaNICU?
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Opinion paper from Thomas Hegyi @RutgersU @RWJUH. Arguing for a fetoneonatology fellowship. A specialty to bridge the gap between MFM and neonatology, caring for the same patient - the baby - just at different times. My thoughts🧵@EBNEO @nicupodcast nature.com/articles/s41372-0…
Should med school cost as much as it does? Probably not. Would I have been able to attend without these loans? Not a chance. Who blinks first? #MedTwitter
House GOP floats steep cuts to medical student loans: 5 notes beckershospitalreview.com/qu…
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Stunning. With rollout of the RSV vaccine and treatment for babies <8 months old, RSV hospitalizations fell >50%.
By comparison, for toddlers and kids <5 years who were not covered by these advances, RSV hospitalizations did not fall.
New RSV vaccine, treatment linked to dramatic fall in baby hospitalizations arstechnica.com/health/2025/…
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
"I like to share my story with other people. Like with other parents who have their kids in the NICU, to let them know how far I’ve come." 29news.com/2025/03/27/uva-na…
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Join us for the 2025 UVA NICU Reunion!
Saturday, October 4th, 2025
1:00pm - 4:00pm
Darden Towe Park, Charlottesville, VA
Please join the UVA NICU staff for an afternoon of celebration!
Snacks, activities and hugs provided!
RSVP/Register:
virginia.az1.qualtrics.com/j…
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
All of this is so important!
Should journals require trials to report how they have disclosed results to patients enrolled in trials, and should that be required prior to publication? #neotwitter
A must read...
Many thoughts about this…
1) Parents of enrollees as of today haven’t even been notified of the results of the trial, including interim analysis at PAS 2023 that was all over social media, and the full study published yesterday. That’s unethical. Optics are not good.
2) If it causes harm for preemies, you’re going to have a lot more medicolegal issues on your hands if you cool them. Published data of increased death = a lawyer’s dream. Risk already discourages providers from naming the specific diagnosis of HIE. Can’t imagine they will be thrilled to cool babies with data showing significant increase of death.
3) Slipping on the shoes of the loss parents from the cooling group, a tough pill to swallow seeing more babies with statistical significance die in the cooling group will likely lead to a lot of “what if”-ing about participating in the trial. “Would my baby be alive if we didn’t do this trial?” Doesn’t matter that there’s a high mortality rate anyway. It’s higher in the cooling group.
4) The fact that communication and engagement was so poor with families enrolled in this trial is even more upsetting today after a good night’s sleep. This hurts research and neonatal trials. Perception of our healthcare system, birth, etc is at an all-time low. We need to work together to improve this.
5) The rest of the world has PPI/community stakeholder engagement mandates, FDA has them for industry. NIH (and we will continue to fight for the NIH and funding despite this!) is woefully behind when it comes to this.
5) We developed a framework of support that addresses these gaps based off of the thousands of families in our community who have been a part of clinical trials and research and their feedback. Their feedback is essential and they easily identify gaps that we have built solutions around.
6) Journals should have higher standards to ensure results being shared and published have an established communication and notification plan with those in the study prior to publishing and hold PIs/authors to it. This also happened with HEAL, as NEJM embargoed it, but we got a courtesy heads up to have resources in place and shared with our community the moment it went live.
Families invest a lot of time and TRUST into these studies, and in clinical care. There are already effective models out there in clinical care and research, neonatology in the US must advance to catch up and change the culture.
Always happy to discuss further. Feel free to reach out (anyone reading this, really). We have a strong bench of expertise on our staff — corporate, community and family communication in healthcare, health and educational literacy, social work, child life, and clinical research administration. We need to work together.
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Excited to share our tool Resub that automatically formats your manuscript for any journal.
We designed Resub for clinical researchers who:
1) Hate wasting time formatting papers
2) Want to save hours per manuscript
3) Are committed to productivity and impact
You can trial it for free at resub.app/
Appreciate the repost and you sharing with any researchers you know 🙏
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Sobering article by @neosatyan about how pediatric sub-specialists are underpaid especially compared to adult counterparts. Includes a link to the NASEM report that recommends changes. Also see my prior tweets about salaries in the NHS (UK docs are underpaid compared to US docs). #medtwitter #neotwitter
"The Salary Problem in Pediatric Subspecialties" from Op-Med. Read on @Doximity opmed.doximity.com/articles/…
And the tracheal aspirate had bacteria on the gram stain!
“They started antibiotics because the CRP was 5…”
Caption contest #neotwitter
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Excited to share that Kristen Heinen, one of our pediatric neurologists @UVANeurology and one of our NeuroNICU leaders, is one of 44 physicians now certified in Neonatal Neurocritical Care! Congrats Dr Heinen!! ucns.org/Online/Online/News/…
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
It would be interesting to do a study to compare the number of high-impact research studies in neonatology emerging from the US, the UK, Canada and Australia/New Zealand, etc, normalized in some fashion for size of country and research spending (e.g. by population, research funding, number of academics). Any takers? Has this been done already?
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Feeding a baby born by caesarean section milk containing a tiny bit of their mother’s poo introduces beneficial microbes to their gut go.nature.com/48oD7hK
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
I am editor in a journal. The last time a reviewer accepted my invitation to review was June 29. Currently, I have a ms with 22 invitations (I´ve had more), none accepted. Is it just me? Am I the only one reviewing ms for everyone else? (And yes, I came here to complain)
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Related? Video Review of #neonatal #resuscitation is acceptable: nature.com/articles/s41390-0…
Video review used to assess student performance: academic.oup.com/tropej/arti…
But would we in #NICU accept #AI video review of our performances? Pondering the possibilities...
@TCHQUEST @neo_twiter #MedTwitter @LindseyKnake #NRP #NeoResus @NeoResus
Jonathan Swanson retweeted
Amazing teamwork makes all the difference! Proud to be recognized as a Top 50 NICU continuously since 2014 and the #1 Children’s Hospital in Virginia once again!
Proud to share that @usnewshealth named #UVAHealth Children’s the No. 1 children’s hospital in VA for the 4th year! The 2024-25 “Best Children’s Hospitals” guide also ranks 8 of our specialties among the top 50 nationally. Learn more: bit.ly/4gYxlHa



























