Byte Stealer, locksport, i̵n̵f̵o̵s̵e̵c̵ hacking, phreaking, #Telephreak, @TelephreakBadge

Spencer, IA
Joined July 2008
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” - Mark Twain
3
943
The addition of "Admin UI Extensions" is one of the greatest features added to @Shopify in a long while. The fact that I can quickly develop a niche app for our stores needs, that I don't have to have 3rd party hosting for and can quickly develop is amazing. Yes, you're limited to what functionality it can do and it isn't perfect for every situation, but its a godsend for quick niche needs.
1
23
Do I know anyone who works for @X or do I know anyone who knows anyone who works for X? If so please DM me or have them DM me.
4
573
Same fucking hashtags are on @Meta @instagram!!!
11
So I wondered if AI cared if I added emphisis to words, or was I just wasting tokens, so I had this conversation with @ChatGPT and the results were interesting: You: Tell me how you interpret these two sentences differently: “It takes way too long” “It takes waaaaaaaay too long” ChatGPT: “It takes way too long” means it takes significantly longer than it should. It communicates dissatisfaction, but in a fairly ordinary, matter-of-fact way. “It takes waaaaaaaay too long” means the same thing literally, but the stretched “way” adds strong emphasis and frustration. I’d read it more like: “It takes an absurdly long time — much, much longer than is acceptable.” So the difference is mostly intensity: way too long → clearly too long waaaaaaaay too long → not even close to acceptable; dramatically too long In speech, the second one would sound like someone physically drawing out the word: “It takes waaaaaay too long.” You: So I was working on a project with you and I used the waaaaaaaaay too long version. How would that change your response to me compared to if I just used way too long? ChatGPT: It would mainly change how strongly I interpret your frustration and how aggressively I should adjust my behavior — not the underlying technical meaning of the request. If you say, “This is taking way too long,” I’d read that as: the process is inefficient, you want me to speed up, and I should cut unnecessary explanation, reduce back-and-forth, and get to the result faster. If you say, “This is taking waaaaaaaay too long,” I’d interpret that as a much stronger signal: you are already significantly frustrated with the pace, and my current approach is failing you. At that point I should immediately simplify the workflow, stop doing anything nonessential, avoid asking questions unless absolutely necessary, and prioritize producing a usable result as quickly as possible. It should also affect my tone. With the stretched version, I should be less conversational and more corrective, e.g. acknowledge the problem briefly and then act: “You’re right — I’m taking far too long on this. I’m cutting the extra steps and finishing the core task directly.” What it shouldn’t do is make me panic, skip important accuracy checks, or assume you’ve changed the actual requirements. It’s primarily an intensity signal: “this problem is not minor anymore; fix the process now.” So, roughly: “way too long” = speed this up. “waaaaaaaay too long” = the current process is unacceptable; change approach immediately.
2
82
All I see is a positive review for GLM – 5.3. Thanks for pointing this out to me and @AnthropicAI! I appreciate it.
so Anthropic files for IPO and then immediately drops a blog post calling one of their biggest open-weight competitors a danger to the world? classic! now seems like a good time to point out that I built and run OBLITERATUS, an abliteration framework with over 8k stars and 1.5k forks on GitHub, using Anthropic’s very own models! 🤗
76
Posting this for the handful of you who run UniFi gear. I've been building a browser extension for @Ubiquiti networks called Ubicon. It fixes one of the dumbest gaps in their management UI, which is that you can't upload your own icons or images for devices. If you manage large networks, being able to identify a device quickly is a big help. It's free and open source. I built it for myself and figured other people might want it too. If you've got a team, you can point it at a private GitHub repo and everyone stays in sync. It doesn't collect anything. No analytics, no tracking. The only outbound request it makes is to a CDN to pull the public icon database from GitHub. If you try it, tell me what breaks or what you'd want added. ubiconapp.com
1
2
6
256
If you’re at @toool lockfest today or tomorrow stop and say hi!
1
1
7
271
Any person who knows too much can no longer fit in anywhere.
4
85
Midnight is never the end of a day. It is the "instant" a new day begins. Its 00:00. So stop saying a date and using midnight to explain the end of that day.
1
84
Las Vegas hotels smell like the car of a smoker who remembers to change their air freshener weekly.
1
69
Hey @uwu_underground I’ll be genuinely disappointed if there isn’t one of the following by next defcon: 1) sticker to represent “hiding the knife in the glitter” 2) a t-shirt with same theme as above 3) a song called “Knives In the Glitter”
This was a great post, so we wanted to answer, its as close to our manifesto as we will get: What are we against? Exploitation dressed as opportunity. Surveillance sold as safety. Vendors hiding behind legal language, scam products, fake methodologies, and compliance theater. Security theater sold as transformation. Acronyms like ZTA packaged as salvation, then stapled onto broken environments because CISOs love a clean dashboard and vendors love a budget cycle. Cyber's version of big pharma: manage the symptoms, protect the revenue, never cure the damn disease. Bootcamps selling desperation to people trying to change their lives. Misinformers and scammers poisoning the well. Stalkers dressing obsession up as investigation. Clout parasites turning harm into content. Governments laundering harm through acronyms. Companies punishing researchers after those same researchers saved their customers from worse. Predators with budgets. Cowards with counsel. Institutions that break people, then invoice them for the privilege. That's the easy answer. What are we for??? that is a bit crazier and harder to explain... We are for the people who get chewed up by those systems and told it was their fault even when they tried to stand by them. For the student trying to get in without getting harvested, stuffed full of false hope, fattened on fake salary promises, and shoved into a dead-end career pipeline by bootcamp farmers with better landing pages than ethics. For the underpaid analyst burning out quietly while the vibe coded dashboard keeps blinking. For the researcher trying to help without getting punished. For treating APTs as more than animal names, spooky acronyms, and vendor-slide mythology. Behind every operation are humans: the people who built it, the people who suffered from it, the researchers who reconstructed it, and the defenders who had to clean up the wreckage. For the victims reduced to metrics, screenshots, and engagement bait by shitty accounts farming someone elses stolen data, stolen identity, lost livelihood, or death for a few dead-eyed impressions here on twitter dot com. For painting infosec as something more than dry reports, vendor PDFs, breach postmortems, and dead-eyed conference panels. There are victims, villains, ghosts, greed, obsession, betrayal, survival, and consequences in this world. There are also tales of extraordinary accomplishments, impossible missions, quiet interceptions, and breaches worth preserving. For the next generation, the current generation, and those who came before us: the hackers, artists, researchers, misfits, and feral little weirdos who deserve better than scams, silence, burn out, and corporate rot. And especially for the weirdos who found computers before they found a safe place to exist, and found friends in terminals, forums, group chats, Discord servers, and late-night DMs while the rest of the mammals never understood it and called it antisocial. For making cybersecurity feel human again. So we try to tell the story like it actually has blood in it. Harder answer... And yea unhinged af looking back at this What hard did we choose? We chose the ugly one. Tell the truth, make it catchy, give it aesthetics, hide the knives in the glitter, and let you mammals dance through the crime scene before you notice the chalk outlines.
3
9
1,177
Dear all #hacker conferences… this should be your CoC!
This was a great post, so we wanted to answer, its as close to our manifesto as we will get: What are we against? Exploitation dressed as opportunity. Surveillance sold as safety. Vendors hiding behind legal language, scam products, fake methodologies, and compliance theater. Security theater sold as transformation. Acronyms like ZTA packaged as salvation, then stapled onto broken environments because CISOs love a clean dashboard and vendors love a budget cycle. Cyber's version of big pharma: manage the symptoms, protect the revenue, never cure the damn disease. Bootcamps selling desperation to people trying to change their lives. Misinformers and scammers poisoning the well. Stalkers dressing obsession up as investigation. Clout parasites turning harm into content. Governments laundering harm through acronyms. Companies punishing researchers after those same researchers saved their customers from worse. Predators with budgets. Cowards with counsel. Institutions that break people, then invoice them for the privilege. That's the easy answer. What are we for??? that is a bit crazier and harder to explain... We are for the people who get chewed up by those systems and told it was their fault even when they tried to stand by them. For the student trying to get in without getting harvested, stuffed full of false hope, fattened on fake salary promises, and shoved into a dead-end career pipeline by bootcamp farmers with better landing pages than ethics. For the underpaid analyst burning out quietly while the vibe coded dashboard keeps blinking. For the researcher trying to help without getting punished. For treating APTs as more than animal names, spooky acronyms, and vendor-slide mythology. Behind every operation are humans: the people who built it, the people who suffered from it, the researchers who reconstructed it, and the defenders who had to clean up the wreckage. For the victims reduced to metrics, screenshots, and engagement bait by shitty accounts farming someone elses stolen data, stolen identity, lost livelihood, or death for a few dead-eyed impressions here on twitter dot com. For painting infosec as something more than dry reports, vendor PDFs, breach postmortems, and dead-eyed conference panels. There are victims, villains, ghosts, greed, obsession, betrayal, survival, and consequences in this world. There are also tales of extraordinary accomplishments, impossible missions, quiet interceptions, and breaches worth preserving. For the next generation, the current generation, and those who came before us: the hackers, artists, researchers, misfits, and feral little weirdos who deserve better than scams, silence, burn out, and corporate rot. And especially for the weirdos who found computers before they found a safe place to exist, and found friends in terminals, forums, group chats, Discord servers, and late-night DMs while the rest of the mammals never understood it and called it antisocial. For making cybersecurity feel human again. So we try to tell the story like it actually has blood in it. Harder answer... And yea unhinged af looking back at this What hard did we choose? We chose the ugly one. Tell the truth, make it catchy, give it aesthetics, hide the knives in the glitter, and let you mammals dance through the crime scene before you notice the chalk outlines.
4
318
If you want to still play this years @Telephreakparty challenge you can do it here: telephreak.party/19/challeng… This will stay up indefinitely, so take your time and have fun! @TelephreakBadge @realTelephreak
4
6
241
I'm going to start using @OmarchyLinux so I can say "I use Arch BTW!" for no other reason than to piss off the people who use default Arch. Life's short, troll hard.
1
7
421
Some of us just know the future! 64GB gang!
1
5
311