Writer, infant

Joined March 2013
My book What's Our Problem? is now available. The book introduces a new framework for thinking about our chaotic political environment. With 303 drawings, it's a toolbox for understanding our societies, our group dynamics, and our own minds. Get it here: waitbutwhy.com/whatsourprobl…
1,090
2,311
435
15,471
64,239,425
The advanced aliens observing us are like “wait that was actually really cool”
The Tesla Roadster is real and it can fly and it looks incredible in person
104
149
9
5,548
155,435
Purchased last year at Art of Play. The bird was too expensive.
24
13
2
584
64,960
Every day I sit down at my desk and stare into the same massive Word document to work on my book, this old Yiddish folk song ends up stuck in my head
22
1
174
35,915
We really need to sand it down
🚨: NASA just released this closest image of Moon ever taken by Artemis II . The clarity in insane in this view.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This image is not from NASA's Artemis II mission. Orion flew no closer than 4,067 miles to the Moon during the flyby. See the actual images NASA released: nasa.gov/blogs/missions… planetary.org/articles/the-b…
31
8
342
85,857
Apparently that is fake and this is the real image.
2
56
14,446
I wish this would never happen, but at least this one is an enhanced version of the actual image. I can't stand all the times when I get this huge dopamine hit from seeing an outrageous Jupiter shot only to learn it's entirely fake.
4
33
10,687
If you would like a taste of what my life is like right now, I wrote this in my book draft— "It’s weird to think about how different aliens may be from us. Maybe they’re 100 feet tall. Or 6 inches tall. Maybe they’re not tall at all because they have 100 legs and look like long strands of spaghetti. Maybe they have giant balloon heads, 40 arms, and 70 boobs." —and my fact-checker flagged the last sentence as a false claim, writing: "Highly unlikely on Earth-like biology. Mammary number correlates with litter size in several species, suggesting an evolutionary pattern, and is limited by the energetic cost of lactation."
54
8
3
674
81,396
I really can't even with quantum mechanics
125
30
8
1,430
218,278
Just the fucking nerve to be that counterintuitive
27
3
167
18,391
Great use of AI
Chief Design Officer @jgebbia officially unveils America.gov, the new online home for the United States of America
23
11
407
59,937
Gripping
Whoever gets 3 cones is the winner 👌🏾❤️
37
144
6
6,572
832,567
Yeah, and my take overall is that you can believe that the threat is potentially real AND have concerns about onerous regulations that create a monopoly or duopoly or otherwise restrict the right to say, for example, open source AI technology, AND while knowing full well we are in a potentially existential battle with China about who can dominate AI. Indeed, all of these things SHOULD be considered in the analysis. @adgo and I tried to explain a sensible First Amendment approach here, which both addresses the potential of catastrophic harm, which almost exclusively comes from when AI is given delegated authority, from helping keep the state’s grubby mitts off of what counts as knowledge. Also, it's a good reminder that if you place too much hope in the idea that code is speech and the First Amendment protects it, the law is decreasingly on your side. But there are other ways of protecting inquiry, information, knowledge, and truth. eternallyradicalidea.com/
I can't predict the AI future, and I'm very unsure about what the right strategy or policies should be moving forward. What I do know is that people who scoff at the idea that we may be in grave danger have not read enough about AI.
11
10
2
75
35,473
One prominent theory says that long before our fish ancestors left the water, they did a lot of this, briefly scooting from pond to pond. Slowly, some evolved to be so good at scooting around on land and breathing air that they became fully amphibious.
You are always one decision away from a different life
201
1,278
47
34,731
2,013,602
When a discussion becomes tribalized, the collective mind drops by 50 IQ points
main thing preventing us from having a productive AI safety conversation is identity. too many AI people want to be seen as intelligent by AI safety giants. too many skeptics want to be seen as critical of EA. you have to actually think. that is the only way we'll get there.
26
28
1
639
59,013
It is not like other technologies
Replying to @waitbutwhy
Or have lived through many other moral panics involving new technologies.
317
237
45
4,351
317,611
I can't predict the AI future, and I'm very unsure about what the right strategy or policies should be moving forward. What I do know is that people who scoff at the idea that we may be in grave danger have not read enough about AI.
361
274
69
3,768
217,242
Guys, sure, there are lots of "laws on the books" that apply to AI companies. But there is no such law preventing the creation of a model capable of rapid recursive self-improvement and if we get out-of-control superintelligence we can't just sue it after the fact!
122
48
34
708
149,162
Tim Urban retweeted
This @waitbutwhy cartoon hits the 🎯
1,449
2,288
368
24,756
5,575,829
There are currently zero things more important than "don't die to AI" becoming a bipartisan project rather than a Democrat-polarized issue. If you have any political capital you can spend on this, do it now, I beg of you. Life or death.
304
337
115
3,364
319,399
Capability vs. Safety resource allocation: Nuclear: 60/40 Aviation: 60/40 Medical devices: 20/80 AI: 99/1 Do I understand the situation correctly?
360
211
46
5,067
588,124