josh retweeted
Amigo empieza a obsesionarte de nuevo con tu propio crecimiento. Tu cuerpo. Tu dinero. Tus pasatiempos. Tu futuro.
josh retweeted
The nostalgia is real without this one.
Aneh ya, kadang yang paling tenang justru datang di waktu yang paling berantakan. Langitnya bagus, airnya tenang, seolah semuanya berjalan sesuai waktunya dan gak ada yang terburu-buru.
Padahal di sini masih banyak yang belum ke mana-mana, masih banyak yang muter di kepala dan belum nemu tempatnya.
Mungkin memang gak semua hal harus langsung dipahami atau langsung selesai. Kadang cukup dilihat aja sampai mata terbiasa sama cahayanya, sampai napasnya pelan sendiri, tanpa harus memaksa semuanya langsung rapi.
josh retweeted
it genuinely kills me every time i remember this gigantic cosmic entity’s name is literally a random venezuelan town in the middle of nowhere like stephen king i know what you are
anoche tuve una conversación que me hizo ser consciente de una realidad que había ignorado por mucho tiempo y de pronto todo tuvo sentido
josh retweeted
Chomsky was wrong.
Researchers found your brain doesn’t store language the way every textbook since 1957 claims.
For decades, the undisputed rule of linguistics, led by Noam Chomsky, was that human language is hierarchical.
We were told our brains process language using complex "grammar trees." That we secretly build deep, abstract, mathematical rules in our heads before we speak.
This new paper proves that is completely wrong.
Researchers at Cornell University analyzed how people actually process and produce language in real time.
They found sequences. Linear chunks.
When we speak, we aren't calculating deep syntactic rules. We are just predicting the next most logical sequence of words based on the context of the words right before it.
We string linear chunks together.
If this sounds familiar, it should.
This is exactly how Large Language Models like ChatGPT work.
For years, critics have dismissed AI as "just a next-token predictor." They said it isn't truly intelligent because it doesn't understand deep grammatical hierarchies like humans do.
But this paper suggests humans don't use those hierarchies either.
We are just predicting the next chunk.
Language isn't a rigid tree of mathematical rules. It's a linear stream of contextual predictions.
We thought we were building AI to mimic the complexity of the human brain.
It turns out, the human brain was just running a simpler algorithm all along.

































