Justice for John O’Keefe FLY EAGLES FLY
Joined August 2011
- Tweets7.9K
- Following1.4K
- Followers1.8K
- Likes17K
WOW! Talk about being “lost in the sauce”! Listen closely to these three clips. Now we know why @RealNurseKim still claims an arm couldn’t shatter a taillight and that John had no lower-extremity injuries, even though the medical examiner testified to a knee abrasion.
All this time, Kim believed the incriminating clips of Rescue Randy shown at trial, clips that supported the Commonwealth’s case and showed precisely what likely happened to John that evening, were videos Dr. Welcher had made. News flash, Kim: ARCCA put that evidence up for the world to see!
That’s right: the defense team’s “experts” showed us that when Karen reversed her Lexus, it shattered her taillight, caused a pirouette that prevented more severe injuries to the rest of the body, and turned John’s foot, causing his shoe to come off. That shoe was found by the curb, under several feet of snow.
@TeamFUKR and @TuesdayGazette absolutely obliterated Kim during Thursday’s Spaces, where she conveniently glossed over the timeline, John’s DNA, his hair and cocktail-glass fragments all found on the rear of Karen’s SUV. Kim even questioned how John’s phone could have had battery life over the course of the evening and called the data a “belief system” rather than actual data.
She went on to say, “I’m not prepared for my steps because I don’t recall this,” while discussing the fact that only one Apple Health record showed John taking steps after he arrived at 34 FV. Those final 36 steps were smack dab in the middle of a 30-second window in which Karen’s SUV slammed into reverse at 74.5% throttle, traveled 87 feet, and reached a top speed of 24 mph. ending with a sudden 4.5-degree steering-wheel shutter and John’s phone ceasing all movement until he was discovered the next morning.
Kim also created an entirely new insane conspiracy! During the wellness check, snow was caked on what we all know is a missing taillight housing on Karen’s passenger-side taillight. Kim’s crazy theory is because the driver-side taillight was closer to the house, it apparently, shielded it from the same elements by the wind. This ignores the fact that Karen told Gretchen Voss that at 5:07 a.m. her “taillight housing had already collapsed” and that she had “picked pieces out of it”. It also ignores the fact that BOTH of John’s Traverse taillights are also shown to be smooth and red during the wellness check. Details, Kim…….details…….
Now Kim wants a do-over. She wants to bring up a friend to help her. She wants to hold another discussion on her terms and on her platform. I truly hope Truth and Tuesday deny her that luxury. She’s been grifting off a tragedy for 4+ years and pointing the finger at innocent witnesses. She had her shot, failed spectacularly, and should be forced to swim in that pool for eternity.
“Lost in the sauce” is what Kim calls it. Let’s call it what it really is: being completely ignorant of the actual evidence in the case and unwilling to even consider changing your mind when the truth smacks you in the face!
Get lost in THAT sauce, Kim!
youtu.be/x7tNDHP2QG4?is=AaME…
If you can use your God-given critical thinking skills, watch this video, and still believe Karen Read is innocent, then I’m sorry, but you either have an agenda or are the family member people talk about behind your back.
This was the day before the verdicts. I was wrong about what outcome a compromised jury would deliver, even though one juror would say she still thinks Karen hit John with her SUV. But I wasn’t wrong about her freedom: she’ll never truly enjoy it.
Get your popcorn ready!
November 23rd! Reckoning day Karen and Aidan @DoctorTurtleboy Time to show the world how evil you both are!
💪💪💪💪💪
The very first piece of evidence shown to the jury in the Karen Read case would be enough to convict 99.9% of defendants on trial for vehicular manslaughter.
•John is seen on a surveillance video leaving the bar with the cocktail glass.
•On multiple occasions, the accused states that John was in possession of the cocktail glass when he exited her vehicle.
•Multiple forensics experts testified that fragments of the same cocktail glass found next to John’s body were also found on Karen’s bumper.
•The next morning, scratches and a dent were visible in the exact spot you would expect to see them if the glass had been in John’s hand when he was struck by the Lexus. Amazingly, the same damage to Karen’s vehicle was still visible when it was put up for public auction years later.
Have you ever noticed that since Day 1, you rarely if ever hear anybody on the FKR side give any explanation as to how/why the cocktail glass was found next to John immediately after he was discovered and taken to the hospital? Is there anybody out there that truly believes as Yannetti says here that the glass could have been planted by someone inside the house or that John simply dropped the glass that night so hard that it shattered but then just left it on the ground and “skipped up the driveway” as Karen so foolishly said he did that night? We all know how and why the cocktail ended up shattered and located next to his body. They just have never wanted to talk about it.
“In the early innings,” Karen thought, “could I be responsible” for killing John? She further stated, “I don’t know what the hell happened” and “I know I said I hit him.” Then how do you explain, “and then about 10 minutes went by, and I left”? Make it make sense, FKR!
For years, we’ve heard about this wild conspiracy between Canton police and the MSP to frame Karen Read, to plant evidence and conspire against her. In a criminal trial, the defense can get as dirty and brazen as it wants, making wild claims without evidence. It can conjure up cute taglines and talking points.
But a funny thing happens when the case shifts to civil court: you need tangible facts to support your claims. That “reasonable doubt” standard defendants use to get off suddenly disappears. Now Karen and her army of attorneys are forced to concede there was never any coordination between law enforcement agencies. No one directed a detective or SERT team member to tamper with or plant evidence.
So what are they left with when they can no longer claim conspiracy? They’re left accusing those same agencies of failing to provide proper supervision and training. HOW PATHETIC!
Alan Jackson, @WJQM_LLP: take your cute little “Look the other way” tagline and shove it up your a$$!
Awwwww….. did you get put in timeout, @Goatboyppp ?
“What are you doing?” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
In which the pee pee goat lies about getting blocked by @table327, talks paranoid nonsense, and then a dramatic ending to his spaces when his mommy comes in, as well as some quality Barry content - all accented with gifs. You are welcome.
At a May 2023 pretrial hearing, Alan Jackson claimed that the injuries on John O’Keefe’s arm were “deep scratch wounds and puncture wounds,” despite knowing the medical examiner had classified them as linear, superficial scratches, and that his kooky dog-lady expert wouldn’t corroborate those claims. This defense was built on a foundation of lies!
When you know you’re standing on the right side and the truth is with you, don’t let the haters wear you down. Keep showing up, especially when it’s hard, your support reminds them they’re not alone.
Zona Eagle retweeted
One of the most damning texts in Aidan Kearney's phone extraction in terms of his defense in the defamation case and David Yannetti's position as a non party witness in that case is below.
Kearney reaches out to Yannetti and asks ".....if Karen hit John on purpose, which I believe is required for murder, then why would she incriminate herself by leaving an angry voicemail."
The word "incriminate" is jaw dropping.
Kearney admitted to Read's own defense attorney that the voicemails, in his opinion, implied her guilt and yet he would spend the next 3 years brainwashing his audience and tricking the public into believing they didn't.
He would repeatedly, over and over as if he was teaching a class, tell his audience the exact opposite of what he discussed with Yannetti.
He would tell them if Read was guilty, she would've covered up that guilt by leaving John O'Keefe concerned messages asking where he was "like Jen McCabe" thereby distorting the admittedly inculpatory nature of Read's messages and distorting and twisting McCabe's messages.
And it gets worse.
Not only did Yannetti admit Read leaving voice messages in which she screamed "John I fucking hate you" not "make sense", by leaving the voicemails, Yannetti confesses "she supplies the police with motive."
Despite the fact that Yannetti privately admitted the voicemails showed motive, Yannetti, Read, and Jackson conducted a campaign of terror against the witnesses, claiming there was no evidence against Read and publicly declaring the witnesses murdered John O'Keefe and covered it up based on nothing more than rank speculation, gossip, and sensationalized innuendo.
They supplied a struggling internet personality desperate for fame and money with lies and cheered from the sidelines as he harassed and accused the witnesses both online and in real life.
This is so gross, Aidan!
Jen, that’s not even the worst of what @DoctorTurtleboy said about Sandra! Aidan said she was damaged goods and might have actually been into (grape) fantasies…This is disgusting!