s retweeted
Lock yourself in just for 15 minutes and go through this site.
I promise you'll know more about ai agents than 95% of people.
secondbrainos.dev
s retweeted
Security shouldn't end with an audit report or a green checkmark.
ByteGuard is building a world where code can be audited, releases verified, wallet risks exposed, and AI agents held accountable for their actions.
Powered by AI, cryptography and verifiable computation.
The future of security isn't just detecting threats. It's making trust independently verifiable.
$BYTEGUARD
s retweeted
Byteguard is now live
CA: EhQjoRsCsjnSk3uzyVjjNcHoBC5Bd1Awa89uzaPCpump
Heartbleed went unnoticed for years. Trusted releases have shipped compromised code.
The problem isn't just finding vulnerabilities. It's proving what actually ran.
ByteGuard is changing that with AI, cryptographic receipts and verifiable computation.
Security needs evidence. Not promises.
byteguard.io
s retweeted
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
s retweeted
🇮🇱🇰🇵 ZachXBT has publicly acknowledged investigative cooperation with Cyvers, an Israeli blockchain security company, on multiple cases.
CoinDCX: he credited Cyvers with flagging suspicious withdrawals, then said he independently identified the affected wallet.
SBI Crypto: he credited Cyvers with helping investigate approximately $21 million in suspicious outflows. His post noted similarities to North Korean attacks.
HashFlare: he credited Cyvers with first alerting him to movements of funds linked to the fraud case.
What do we know about Cyvers?
It’s an Israeli blockchain security company.
Its co-founder and CEO, Deddy Lavid, says he worked on Israel’s Iron Dome system in 2015.
He also says co-founder Meir Dolev served as a sergeant reporting to him when Lavid was an infantry company commander in the military reserves.
Elron Ventures disclosed approximately 26% ownership of Cyvers as of June 2026, excluding additional convertible investments.
Elron also has the right to appoint a Cyvers board member.
And Elron has a longstanding partnership with Rafael Advanced Defense Systems through Rafael Development Corporation, RDC.
Elron owns 50.1% of RDC.
Rafael owns 49.9%.
RDC has rights to commercialise Rafael’s military technologies for civilian markets.
The distinction matters: Elron holds its Cyvers stake directly. These disclosures do not establish Rafael ownership of Cyvers.
Lavid has also described working with EY and holding discussions with Israeli banks, including CBDC-related discussions.
So the documented connections include military service, Iron Dome experience, financial-sector CBDC relationships and an investor with a Rafael joint venture.
It’s important to understand the incentives behind the information that’s being fed through.
Because they almost always say it’s North Korea.
s retweeted
as someone who works in the software industry in britain, i can't believe there are contracts and estimates like this.
it seems getting these government contracts is incredibly lucrative in the uk, because the amounts are absolutely insane. £1.7bn to £4.4bn for hmrc's customer system? pre ai that's a crazy number. post ai it's still crazy.
for a fraction of the cost you could hire britain's top 50 engineers and pay them £300k a year. over 15 years that's £225m. it would cost less and be way better than what will come out of this.
put the rest into an ai lab and you'd have one of the best funded in europe. but no, it's an hmrc crm system lol.
s retweeted
Study crypto venture in 2021
s retweeted
They're so close. They're so so close to their full circle moment.
Just. A. Little. Further.
Matthew McConaughey says his most controversial opinion is that including tips in the bill leads to worse service because servers know their tip is guaranteed:
“If the tip is included, doesn’t the service suffer? I believe if the tip is included, like extra credit is included like, when did they start giving out 4.2 GPAs? I thought 4.0 was as high as you could get. If you give too much extra credit, doesn’t that mean you’re not giving enough credit to what the original baseline was?
“If you got a 22% tip included in your service, I mean, aren’t you gonna be like, ‘I’ll take my time and do whatever I want. My tip is included, man’?”
This media is unavailable
s retweeted
My first job out of college, sitting there in a presentation by some girlboss, old guy next to me leans over and whispers “she bends over and takes it just like any other”




































